Radiotherapy of extraosseous nasopharyngeal chordoma: A case report and literature review

Sacral Chordoma Presenting as Back Pain in the Chiropractic Clinic: A Case Report

Cases of lumbar and gluteal pain are commonly encountered in chiropractic clinics, with a broad differential diagnosis primarily centered on musculoskeletal conditions. This report presents the second documented case of sacral chordoma diagnosed at a chiropractic clinic and emphasizes the importance of considering alternative diagnoses and interdisciplinary collaboration in patient care. A 42-year-old man presented to a chiropractic clinic with complaints of lumbar and gluteal pain. The initial conservative management based on a presumptive musculoskeletal diagnosis was ineffective. Suspicion of an alternative etiology prompted a referral for imaging, which revealed a sacral chordoma. An interdisciplinary collaboration involving orthopedic surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, and other healthcare professionals was initiated to optimize the treatment outcomes of this rare and aggressive tumor. This case report underscores the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion in cases of musculoskeletal presentations in chiropractic clinics and the critical role of advanced imaging in establishing a definitive diagnosis. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for managing complex conditions such as sacral chordomas, ensuring the delivery of the highest quality of care, and optimizing patient outcomes. Chiropractors play a crucial role in identifying, referring, and contributing to the management of patients with complex presentations as part of a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment plan.

Competing risk nomogram for predicting prognosis of patients with spinal and pelvic chordoma: A SEER-based retrospective study

PURPOSE

Recently, competing risk nomograms were widely applied to predict prognosis in numerous tumors other than chordoma. Here, we aimed to construct and validate a competing-risk-based prognostic nomogram to predict 3- and 5-year cancer-specific death (CSD) in patients with spinal and pelvic chordoma.

METHODS

All chordoma patient data were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) resource, and a total of 485 chordoma patients were eventually included in this study. Multivariate competing risk model and multivariate Cox model were used to determine independent prognostic factors, respectively, and the results of the two models were compared. Nomogram was employed to visualize the competing risk model. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of this model were evaluated by Harrell concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Ten-fold cross-validation was further utilized to validate the prognostic nomogram.

RESULTS

Significant prognostic factors affecting CSD were age (P = 0.016), localized involvement (P < 0.0001), and radical resection (P < 0.001) in the multivariate competing risk model. C-indexes were 0.799 and 0.76, and AUC were 0.812 and 0.778 for 3- and 5-year CSD. Calibration plots demonstrated the nomogram was well-fitted, and DCA indicated good clinical utility. The nomogram showed good performance in the 10-fold cross-validation.

CONCLUSION

We successfully built the first competing-risk-based nomogram to predict clinical outcomes in patients with spinal and pelvic chordoma. This well-established nomogram hopes to help clinicians with precise prognostic assessment and thus improve clinical outcomes.