Bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs)-on-Beads™ as a diagnostic platform for the rapid aneuploidy screening of products of conception

Combined use of bacterial artificial chromosomes-on-beads with karyotype detection improves prenatal diagnosis

Background

This study evaluated the individual and combined diagnostic performance of the bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs)-on-Beads (BoBs™) assay and conventional karyotyping for the prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities in pregnant women who were 35 or more years-old.

Method

The primary outcome was concordance of any numerical, structural, or submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities between BoBs™ and conventional karyotyping of amniotic fluid specimens from pregnant women at 17 to 22 weeks gestation.

Results

We examined samples from 4852 pregnant women. BoBs™ indicated that 4708 samples were normal (97.03%), and 144 were abnormal (2.97%); conventional karyotyping indicated that 4656 (95.96%) samples were normal and 196 (4.04%) were abnormal. The combined use of both methods indicated that 4633 of 4852 samples were normal (95.49%) and 219 of 4852 samples (4.51%) were abnormal. The kappa coefficient of the combined test was 0.70, indicating substantial consistency between BoBs™ and conventional karyotyping (95% CI = 0.65–0.76, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the combined use of BoBs™ and conventional karyotyping detected more fetal abnormalities than either test alone.

Utility and performance of bacterial artificial chromosomes-on-beads assays in chromosome analysis of clinical prenatal samples, products of conception and blood samples

AIM

Chromosome analysis of prenatal samples and products of conception (POC) has conventionally been done by karyotyping (KT). Shortcomings of KT like high turnaround time and culture failure led to technology innovations, such as the bacterial artificial chromosomes (BAC)s-on-Beads (BoBs)-based tests, Prenatal BoBs (prenatal samples) and KaryoLite BoBs (POC samples). In the present study, we validated and evaluated the utility of each test on prenatal, POC and blood samples.

METHODS

Study A (n = 305; 259 prenatal + 46 blood/POC) and Study B (n = 176; 146 POC/chorionic vill + 30 blood/amniotic fluid) samples were analyzed using Prenatal and KaryoLite BoBs kits, respectively. KT, array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (arrayCGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used for comparison of results. Ability of KaryoLite BoBs to identify ring chromosomes was tested.

RESULTS

Prenatal BoBs had zero test failure rate and results of all samples were concordant with KT results. Totally four microdeletions were identified by Prenatal BoBs but not by KT. In Study B, all but two POC samples (one triploid and one tetraploid) were concordant with KT and arrayCGH. Partial chromosomal imbalance detection rate was ~64% and KaryoLite BoBs indicated the presence of a ring chromosome in all four cases. The failure rate of KaryoLite BoBs was 3%.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that Prenatal BoBs (common aneuploidies and nine microdeletions) together with KT constitutes more comprehensive prenatal testing compared to FISH and KT. KaryoLite BoBs for aneuploidies of all chromosomes is highly successful in POC analysis and the ability to indicate presence of ring chromosomes improves its clinical sensitivity. Both tests are robust and could also be used for different specimens.

Application of the BACs-on-Beads™ assay for rapid prenatal detection application of BoBs™ for PND of aneuploidies and microdeletions

Prenatal diagnosis focuses on the detection of anatomic and physiologic problems with a foetus before birth. Karyotyping is currently considered the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities, but this method can be time consuming. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the BACs-on-Beads^TM (BoBs™) assay for the rapid diagnosis of aneuploidies and microdeletions. A total of 625 samples from pregnant women in Fujian province, in southeastern China-including three chorionic villus biopsies, 523 amniotic fluid samples, and 99 umbilical-cord centesis samples-were assessed for chromosomal abnormalities by karyotyping and by the BoBs™ assay. A diagnosis was successfully achieved by karyotyping for 98.8% (618/625) and by the BoBs™ assay for 100% (625/625) of the samples. Both assays were concordant for trisomy 21 (2.72%, 17/625), trisomy 18 (1.12%, 7/625), trisomy 13 (0.48%, 3/625), and sex chromosome aneuploidies (0.8%, 5/625). Unlike karyotyping, the BoBs™ assay detected 22q11.2 microdeletion (0.64%, 4/625), 22q11.2 microduplication (0.16%, 1/625), Smith-Magenis syndrome microdeletion (0.16%, 1/625), and Miller-Dieker syndrome microdeletion (0.16%, 1/625). Thus, the BoBs™ assay is a reliable and rapid test for detecting common aneuploidies and microdeletions for prenatal diagnosis, and could be used instead of karyotyping for detection of common aneuploidies as well as to provide additional information regarding microdeletions.

The Diagnosis of Choriocarcinoma in Molar Pregnancies: A Revised Approach in Clinical Testing

Background

Hydatidiform moles occur in approximately 1 in 1,500 pregnancies; however, early miscarriages or spontaneous abortions may not be correctly identified as molar pregnancies due to poor differentiation of chorionic villi.

Methods

The current clinical testing algorithm used for the detection of hydatidiform moles uses a combination of morphological analysis and p57 immunostaining followed by ploidy testing to establish a diagnosis of either a complete or partial molar pregnancy. We review here 198 referrals for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) ploidy testing, where the initial diagnosis based on morphology is compared to the final diagnosis based on a combination of morphology, FISH and p57 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining.

Results

Approximately 40% of cases were determined to be genetically abnormal, but only 28.8% of cases were diagnosed as molar pregnancies. The underestimation of complete molar pregnancies and those with androgenetic inheritance was also found to be likely using conventional diagnostic methods, as atypical p57 staining was observed in approximately 10% of cases.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that a revised approach to testing products of conception is necessary, with cases screened according to their clinical history in order to distinguish molar pregnancy referrals from hydropic pregnancies.

BACs-on-beads: a new robust and rapid detection method for prenatal diagnosis

Karyotyping, the gold standard used for diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities, is being progressively replaced by rapid aneuploidy testing (RAT) techniques such as quantitative fluorescence-PCR, FISH and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for diagnosing the common aneuploidies or chromosomal microarray analysis for comprehensive genome-wide testing. However, due to technical limitations, current RATs are confined to the detection of common aneuploidies 13, 18, 21 and sex chromosomes. To overcome the limitations of RATs, a bacterial artificial chromosomes-on-beads (BoBs™) assay technology has been introduced for the detection of the common aneuploidies as well as specific microdeletion syndromes. The BoBs assay is a bead-based multiplex assay using polystyrene beads impregnated with two spectrally distinct infrared fluorochromes to create a liquid array of up to 100 unique spectral signatures that supports the analysis of that scale of simultaneous hybridization assays on a minute DNA sample. This review gives an overview on the collective experiences of BoBs applications in prenatal diagnosis.