LIM kinase 1 is required for insulin‑dependent cell growth of osteosarcoma cell lines

PDZ and LIM Domain-Encoding Genes: Their Role in Cancer Development

PDZ-LIM family proteins (PDLIMs) are a kind of scaffolding proteins that contain PDZ and LIM interaction domains. As protein-protein interacting molecules, PDZ and LIM domains function as scaffolds to bind to a variety of proteins. The PDLIMs are composed of evolutionarily conserved proteins found throughout different species. They can participate in cell signal transduction by mediating the interaction of signal molecules. They are involved in many important physiological processes, such as cell differentiation, proliferation, migration, and the maintenance of cellular structural integrity. Studies have shown that dysregulation of the PDLIMs leads to tumor formation and development. In this paper, we review and integrate the current knowledge on PDLIMs. The structure and function of the PDZ and LIM structural domains and the role of the PDLIMs in tumor development are described.

LIM Kinases, LIMK1 and LIMK2, Are Crucial Node Actors of the Cell Fate: Molecular to Pathological Features

LIM kinase 1 (LIMK1) and LIM kinase 2 (LIMK2) are serine/threonine and tyrosine kinases and the only two members of the LIM kinase family. They play a crucial role in the regulation of cytoskeleton dynamics by controlling actin filaments and microtubule turnover, especially through the phosphorylation of cofilin, an actin depolymerising factor. Thus, they are involved in many biological processes, such as cell cycle, cell migration, and neuronal differentiation. Consequently, they are also part of numerous pathological mechanisms, especially in cancer, where their involvement has been reported for a few years and has led to the development of a wide range of inhibitors. LIMK1 and LIMK2 are known to be part of the Rho family GTPase signal transduction pathways, but many more partners have been discovered over the decades, and both LIMKs are suspected to be part of an extended and various range of regulation pathways. In this review, we propose to consider the different molecular mechanisms involving LIM kinases and their associated signalling pathways, and to offer a better understanding of their variety of actions within the physiology and physiopathology of the cell.

LIM Kinases in Osteosarcoma Development

Tumorigenesis is a long-term and multistage process that often leads to the formation of metastases. During this pathological course, two major events appear to be crucial: primary tumour growth and metastatic expansion. In this context, despite research and clinical advances during the past decades, bone cancers remain a leading cause of death worldwide among paediatric cancer patients. Osteosarcomas are the most common malignant bone tumours in children and adolescents. Notwithstanding advances in therapeutic treatments, many patients succumb to these diseases. In particular, less than 30% of patients who demonstrate metastases at diagnosis or are poor responders to chemotherapy survive 5 years after initial diagnosis. LIM kinases (LIMKs), comprising LIMK1 and LIMK2, are common downstream effectors of several signalization pathways, and function as a signalling node that controls cytoskeleton dynamics through the phosphorylation of the cofilin family proteins. In recent decades, several reports have indicated that the functions of LIMKs are mainly implicated in the regulation of actin microfilament and the control of microtubule dynamics. Previous studies have thus identified LIMKs as cancer-promoting regulators in multiple organ cancers, such as breast cancer or prostate cancer. This review updates the current understanding of LIMK involvement in osteosarcoma progression.

Cofilin-1, LIMK1 and SSH1 are differentially expressed in locally advanced colorectal cancer and according to consensus molecular subtypes

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the deadliest cancers, wherein early dissemination of tumor cells, and consequently, metastasis formation, are the main causes of mortality and poor prognosis. Cofilin-1 (CFL-1) and its modulators, LIMK1/SSH1, play key roles in mediating the invasiveness by driving actin cytoskeleton reorganization in various cancer types. However, their clinical significance and prognostic value in CRC has not been fully explored. Here, we evaluated the clinical contribution of these actin regulators according to TNM and consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) classification.

Methods

CFL-1, LIMK1 and SSH1 mRNA/protein levels were assessed by real-time PCR and immunohistochemical analyses using normal adjacent and tumor tissues obtained from a clinical cohort of CRC patients. The expression levels of these proteins were associated with clinicopathological features by using the chi square test. In addition, using RNA-Seq data of CRC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, we determine how these actin regulators are expressed and distributed according to TNM and CMSs classification. Based on gene expression profiling, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to evaluated overall survival.

Results

Bioinformatic analysis revealed that LIMK1 expression was upregulated in all tumor stages. Patients with high levels of LIMK1 demonstrated significantly lower overall survival rates and exhibited greater lymph node metastatic potential in a clinical cohort. In contrast, CFL-1 and SSH1 have expression downregulated in all tumor stages. However, immunohistochemical analyses showed that patients with high protein levels of CFL-1 and SSH1 exhibited greater lymph node metastatic potential and greater depth of local invasion. In addition, using the CMSs classification to evaluate different biological phenotypes of CRC, we observed that LIMK1 and SSH1 genes are upregulated in immune (CMS1) and mesenchymal (CMS4) subtypes. However, patients with high levels of LIMK1 also demonstrated significantly lower overall survival rates in canonical (CMS2), and metabolic (CMS3) subtypes.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that CFL-1 and its modulators, LIMK1/SSH1, are differentially expressed and associated with lymph node metastasis in CRC. Finally, this expression profile may be useful to predict patients with aggressive signatures, particularly, the immune and mesenchymal subtypes of CRC.

Cytoskeletal Remodeling in Cancer

Simple Summary

Cell migration is an essential process from embryogenesis to cell death. This is tightly regulated by numerous proteins that help in proper functioning of the cell. In diseases like cancer, this process is deregulated and helps in the dissemination of tumor cells from the primary site to secondary sites initiating the process of metastasis. For metastasis to be efficient, cytoskeletal components like actin, myosin, and intermediate filaments and their associated proteins should co-ordinate in an orderly fashion leading to the formation of many cellular protrusions-like lamellipodia and filopodia and invadopodia. Knowledge of this process is the key to control metastasis of cancer cells that leads to death in 90% of the patients. The focus of this review is giving an overall understanding of these process, concentrating on the changes in protein association and regulation and how the tumor cells use it to their advantage. Since the expression of cytoskeletal proteins can be directly related to the degree of malignancy, knowledge about these proteins will provide powerful tools to improve both cancer prognosis and treatment.

Abstract

Successful metastasis depends on cell invasion, migration, host immune escape, extravasation, and angiogenesis. The process of cell invasion and migration relies on the dynamic changes taking place in the cytoskeletal components; actin, tubulin and intermediate filaments. This is possible due to the plasticity of the cytoskeleton and coordinated action of all the three, is crucial for the process of metastasis from the primary site. Changes in cellular architecture by internal clues will affect the cell functions leading to the formation of different protrusions like lamellipodia, filopodia, and invadopodia that help in cell migration eventually leading to metastasis, which is life threatening than the formation of neoplasms. Understanding the signaling mechanisms involved, will give a better insight of the changes during metastasis, which will eventually help targeting proteins for treatment resulting in reduced mortality and longer survival.

Hsa_circ_0008934 promotes the proliferation and migration of osteosarcoma cells by targeting miR-145-5p to enhance E2F3 expression

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of hsa_circ_0008934 in osteosarcoma and the molecular mechanism involved in the regulation of the occurrence and development of osteosarcoma METHODS: Differentially expressed circRNAs in the osteosarcoma cell lines SaOS2 and MG63 and in the normal human osteoblast cell line hFOB1.19 were identified via next-generation RNA sequencing. The expression and circular morphology of hsa_circ_0008934 were analyzed via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and RT-PCR analysis, respectively. Proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle progression, migration, and invasion of SaOS2 and MG63 cells with hsa_circ_0008934 silencing or overexpression were assessed using the MTS method, colony formation assay, flow cytometry, and the transwell system, respectively. The subcellular distribution of hsa_circ_0008934 was revealed via fluorescence in situ hybridization. The binding of hsa_circ_0008934 with microRNAs was confirmed using the dual-luciferase reporter assay. The oncogenic roles of hsa_circ_0008934 in osteosarcoma were determined using an in vivo tumorigenesis assay with nude mice. qRT-PCR, western blotting, TUNEL assay, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were used to detect the tumorigenicity of hsa_circ_0008934 in osteosarcoma cells.

RESULTS

Many circRNAs were differentially expressed in SaOS2 and MG63 cells than in hFOB1.19 cells. Hsa_circ_0008934 expression was significantly elevated in SaOS2 and MG63 cells. Hsa_circ_0008934 silencing significantly reduced proliferation, enhanced apoptosis, blocked cell cycle progression, and impaired migration and invasion capacities of SaOS2 cells. Opposite cellular alterations were achieved by overexpressing hsa_circ_0008934 in MG63 cells. Hsa_circ_0008934 was mainly distributed in the cytosol and positively regulated E2F3 expression in osteosarcoma cells. In addition, it directly bound with miR-145-5p to repress E2F3 expression and enhanced the tumorigenesis of MG63 cells in nude mice. qRT-PCR revealed that the intracellular injection of hsa_circ_0008934 lentivirus resulted in hsa_circ_0008934 overexpression and miR-145-5p downregulation. Western blotting confirmed that E2F3 was upregulated. Moreover, the TUNEL assay showed that hsa_circ_0008934 overexpression inhibited the apoptosis of tumor cells. IHC detection revealed that the hsa_circ_0008934 overexpression could promote the expression of Ki67 and PCNA.

CONCLUSION

Elevated hsa_circ_0008934 expression promotes the proliferation and migration of osteosarcoma cells by sponging miR-145-5p to enhance E2F3 expression.

Effects of PAK4/LIMK1/Cofilin-1 signaling pathway on proliferation, invasion, and migration of human osteosarcoma cells

Purpose

To explore the effects of PAK4/LIMK1/Cofilin‐1 signaling pathway on the proliferation, invasion, and migration of human osteosarcoma cells.

Methods

The expression of PAK4/LIMK1/Cofilin‐1 was detected by immunohistochemistry in osteosarcoma tissues. The osteosarcoma cell line MG63 was transfected and divided into Mock, Control siRNA, si‐PAK4, LIMK1, and si‐PAK4+LIMK1 groups. Then, the cellular biological features of MG63 cells were detected by CCK‐8, wound‐healing, Transwell, and flow cytometry methods. The relationship of PAK4 and LIMK1 was performed by co‐immunoprecipitation test, and the protein expression of PAK4/LIMK1/Cofilin‐1 was determined by Western blotting. Finally, the effect of PAK4 on the growth of osteosarcoma was verified by subcutaneous transplantation model of osteosarcoma in nude mice.

Results

The expression of PAK4/LIMK1/Cofilin‐1 in both osteosarcoma tissues and cells was up‐regulated. Positive PAK4, LIMK1, and Cofilin‐1 expressions in osteosarcoma were associated with the clinical stage, distant metastasis, and tumor grade. The MG63 cell viability, migration, and invasion, as well as the expression of PAK4, p‐LIMK/LIMK, and p‐Cofilin‐1/Cofilin‐1, were restrained by the knock down of PAK4 while it promoted apoptosis. PAK4 silencing also suppressed the growth of subcutaneous transplanted tumor in nude mice. Co‐immunocoprecipitation showed that LIMK and PAK4 protein can form complex in osteosarcoma cells. Besides, LIMK1 overexpression reversed the inhibition effect of PAK4 siRNA on the growth of osteosarcoma cells.

Conclusion

The expression of PAK4/LIMK1/Cofilin‐1 pathway in osteosarcoma tissues was up‐regulated. Thus, PAK4 inhibition may restrict the osteosarcoma cell proliferation, invasion, and migration but promote its apoptosis via decreasing the activity of LIMK1/Cofilin‐1 pathway.

LIM kinase 1 serves an important role in the multidrug resistance of osteosarcoma cells

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major challenge for the management of the majority of cancers. The precise molecular mechanisms of MDR remain elusive. In a previous study, a multidrug resistant osteosarcoma model [MG63/vincristine (VCR)] was established by intermittent exposure of MG63 cells to gradually increasing concentrations of VCR. These cells exhibited cross-resistance to multiple structurally and mechanistically unrelated chemotherapeutic agents. The development of MDR was associated with increased expression of LIM kinase 1 (LIMK1). Compared with that in normal human fetal osteoblasts (hFOB) 1.19, the messenger RNA and protein expression of LIMK1 was significantly elevated both in MG63 and U2OS osteosarcoma cells. To observe the expression pattern of LIMK1 in osteosarcoma, immunohistochemical analyses were performed on specimens derived from 6 patients. The results indicated that LIMK1 was expressed to a greater extent in the tumor parenchyma than in the mesenchyme. The role of LIMK1 in MDR was confirmed by transfecting plasmids coding LIMK1-small interfering RNA (siRNA), wild-type-LIMK1 or empty vector into MG63/VCR cells, and measuring the expression of LIMK1 and multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1), also known as P-gycoprotein (P-gp). The results demonstrated that the level of MDR1/P-gp was positively correlated with the level of LIMK1. This correlation was also shown with the doxorubicin efflux assay and by measuring apoptosis. Specifically, after 6 h of incubation with VCR, 25.6% of the cells transfected with the LIMK1-siRNA plasmid were apoptotic compared with 6.2% in the empty vector group and 1.3% in the group of cells transfected with the wild-type-LIMK1 plasmid. Thus, it was concluded that LIMK1 serves a key role in the MDR of osteosarcoma and functions through MDR1.

Cofilin-1 and Other ADF/Cofilin Superfamily Members in Human Malignant Cells

Identification of actin-depolymerizing factor homology (ADF-H) domains in the structures of several related proteins led first to the formation of the ADF/cofilin family, which then expanded to the ADF/cofilin superfamily. This superfamily includes the well-studied cofilin-1 (Cfl-1) and about a dozen different human proteins that interact directly or indirectly with the actin cytoskeleton, provide its remodeling, and alter cell motility. According to some data, Cfl-1 is contained in various human malignant cells (HMCs) and is involved in the formation of malignant properties, including invasiveness, metastatic potential, and resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. The presence of other ADF/cofilin superfamily proteins in HMCs and their involvement in the regulation of cell motility were discovered with the use of various OMICS technologies. In our review, we discuss the results of the study of Cfl-1 and other ADF/cofilin superfamily proteins, which may be of interest for solving different problems of molecular oncology, as well as for the prospects of further investigations of these proteins in HMCs.

Upregulation of Limk1 caused by microRNA-138 loss aggravates the metastasis of ovarian cancer by activation of Limk1/cofilin signaling

LIM kinase 1 (Limk1) is associated with cell prolife-ration and metastasis and its dysregulated expression has been observed in many types of cancer. The present study aimed to examine the role of Limk1 in the development of ovarian cancer, as well as the underlying molecular mechanism involved. The results showed that increased Limk1 and decreased miR-138 expression co-existed in ovarian cancer. Furthermore, knockout of Limk1 or the overexpression of miR-138 resulted in reduced cell invasion and migration, while silencing of miR-138 led to enhancement of the invasion and migration of ovarian cancer cells. Cell growth was inhibited by the overexpression of miR-138, although not by the knockout of Limk1. miR-138 directly targeted Limk1 and inhibited ovarian cancer cell growth by PCNA and Bcl-2. Moreover, Limk1/cofilin/p-cofilin is likely a critical signaling pathway involving in miR-138 modulation of ovarian cancer cell metastasis. The results provide evidence supporting miR-138/Limk1 as a novel diagnostic or therapeutic target for ovarian cancer.