Identification of KRAS and PIK3CA but not BRAF mutations in patients with gastric cancer

Mutation patterns and prognostic analysis of BRAF/KRAS/PIK3CA in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Aberrant gene expression and abnormal signaling pathways often occur in patients with colorectal cancer, in which mutations in B-Raf Proto-Oncogene (BRAF), KRAS Proto-Oncogene (KRAS), and Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PIK3CA) are quite common. In this study, the relationship between BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA mutations and clinicopathologic features and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients was investigated.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty patients with colorectal cancer admitted to Affiliated people's Hospital (Fujian Provincial People's Hospital), Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were collected and grouped according to the mutation patterns of BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA. The association between BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA mutations and pathological factors (age, sex, etc.) was analyzed using the Chi-square test. Subsequently, survival analysis was performed to screen the impact factors of overall survival time by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve, and Cox regression model was established for the selected factors.

RESULTS

BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA mutations were not associated with age, sex, and alcoholism. K-M curve and log-rank test results demonstrated that among the factors included in this study, overall survival rate of colorectal cancer patients was only associated with mutation factors. The prognosis of KRAS+/PIK3CA-/BRAF-mutant and KRAS-/PIK3CA-/BRAF+mutant patients was better than that of KRAS+/PIK3CA+/BRAF-mutant patients.

CONCLUSION

The mutant patterns of BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA were not related to the general and clinicopathological features of patients. The mutant pattern could be used as an independent prognostic factor for colorectal cancer.

Mutations of key driver genes in gastric cancer metastasis risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Associations between gene mutations and metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) remain contradictory, resulting in the inaccurate estimation of the magnitude of the risk associated with specific genotypes.Methods: In this study, we first screened out four key driver genes (TP53, PIK3CA, APC and ARID1A) by jointly analyzing the mutation levels and searching the literature for genes associated with GC metastasis. We then performed a meta-analysis to demonstrate the relationship between these key driver gene mutations and GC metastasis, including lymphatic and distance metastasis.Results: We found out four key driver genes (TP53, PIK3CA, APC and ARID1A), associated with risk of GC metastasis. The results showed that TP53 (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12-1.72) and APC mutations (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.89) were associated with lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis in GC. And TP53 mutations (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.25-2.18) were significantly related to GC metastasis in the Asian population. APC mutations (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29-1.00) were also related to GC metastasis in the European and American populations. There was no significant association with GC metastasis in PIK3CA or ARID1A mutations.Expert opinion:Mutations of TP53 and APC play important roles in lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis of GC and may be potential important biomarkers of progression and therapeutic targets. These observations should be further prospectively verified.

Associations of PIK3CA mutations with clinical features and prognosis in gastric cancer

Aim: The clinical implications of PIK3CA mutations in gastric cancer (GC) are not conclusive. Materials & methods: A systematic searching of the previous publications and related studies in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were performed to investigate the clinical implications of PIK3CA mutations in GC.  Results: Twenty-six independent cohort studies including six studies with original data were identified. Meta-analysis suggested PIK3CA mutations were associated with high T stage, poor differentiation and microsatellite instability, but not with prognosis in overall. However, PIK3CA mutation was found to be associated with favorable overall survival in subgroup of patients with low PIK3CA mutation prevalence. Conclusion: PIK3CA mutations might be involved in GC development and might be used as favorable prognostic factor in GC population with low PIK3CA mutations prevalence.

KRAS G12V Mutation is an Adverse Prognostic Factor of Chinese Gastric Cancer Patients

This study aims to investigate the molecular characteristics of Chinese gastric cancer patients. In our study, the KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation status of 485 GC patients were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to plot survival curves according to different genotypes. The results show that the frequency of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were 4.1%, 1.2% and 3.5%, respectively. BRAF mutations were significantly concentrated in stage III and IV gastric cancer (P=0.009). KRAS G12V mutation carriers have much shorter OS than other mutation carriers and wild-type group patients (P=0.013). In conclusion, only the KRAS G12V mutation has an adverse effect on patient survival.

Mutation Status and Immunohistochemical Correlation of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF in 260 Chinese Colorectal and Gastric Cancers

KRAS, NRAS and BRAF are kinases involved in the RAS-RAF-MAPK signaling pathway and also potential tumor-driven genes. Patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations are resistant to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the mutation status and distribution of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF in Chinese colorectal and gastric cancers, and to explore the histopathological changes and related immunohistochemical marker changes caused by these mutations. The mutation status of KRAS (exons 2, codon 12/13), NRAS (exons 2/3/4, codon 12/13/59/61/117/146) and BRAF (exons 15, codon 600) were detected by amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) in 86 colon cancer, 140 rectal cancer and 34 gastric cancer tissues. Then, the frequencies and distribution of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations were described in detail. Furthermore, the relationship between KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations and the features of histopathological and related immunohistochemical markers were analyzed. The results showed that KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation rates in colon cancer were 44.2, 1.2, and 3.5%; in rectal cancer were 37.1, 4.3, and 0.7%; in gastric cancer were none, none and 2.9%. The mutation rate of KRAS in female (48.8%) is significantly higher than that of male (27.8%), and the mutation rate increased with the higher degree of differentiation. Additionally, the mutation rate of BRAF detected by ARMS-PCR (1.77%) was significantly lower than that by immunohistochemistry (4.11%). It also showed that the KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation status had a certain relationship with the expression of some immunohistochemical markers. This study provides more data support for clinical research on KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation in CRCs or gastric cancers.