Role of downregulated ADARB1 in lung squamous cell carcinoma

Integration of TE Induces Cancer Specific Alternative Splicing Events

Alternative splicing of messenger RNA (mRNA) precursors contributes to genetic diversity by generating structurally and functionally distinct transcripts. In a disease state, alternative splicing promotes incidence and development of several cancer types through regulation of cancer-related biological processes. Transposable elements (TEs), having the genetic ability to jump to other regions of the genome, can bring about alternative splicing events in cancer. TEs can integrate into the genome, mostly in the intronic regions, and induce cancer-specific alternative splicing by adjusting various mechanisms, such as exonization, providing splicing donor/acceptor sites, alternative regulatory sequences or stop codons, and driving exon disruption or epigenetic regulation. Moreover, TEs can produce microRNAs (miRNAs) that control the proportion of transcripts by repressing translation or stimulating the degradation of transcripts at the post-transcriptional level. Notably, TE insertion creates a cancer-friendly environment by controlling the overall process of gene expression before and after transcription in cancer cells. This review emphasizes the correlative interaction between alternative splicing by TE integration and cancer-associated biological processes, suggesting a macroscopic mechanism controlling alternative splicing by TE insertion in cancer.

Downregulated ADARB1 Facilitates Cell Proliferation, Invasion and has Effect on the Immune Regulation in Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage and poses a significant challenge to treatment and recovery. Rencently, Adenosine deaminase RNA-specific B1 (ADARB1), an adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA-editing enzyme, has been found to play an essential role in the development of cancer. However, the specific function of ADARB1 in ovarian cancer is still not fully understood. Here, we investigated the effects of ADARB1 on OC biology. By conducting bioinformatics analyses of several public databases, we found significantly decreased ADARB1 expression in OC cells and tissues. Moreover, RT-PCR and western blot showed lower ADARB1 expression in OVCAR3, HO8910pm and A2780 OC cells compared to human normal ovarian epithelial cell IOSE. Cell proliferation assay and clone formation assay showed that overexpression of ADARB1 (ADARB1-OE) inhibited the proliferation of tumor cells. Wound healing and transwell assay indicated that ADARB1-OE could suppress OC cell invasion and metastasis. Kaplan-Meier methods revealed that the patients with low level of ADARB1 displayed poor prognosis. TISIDB databases were further used to analyze the roles of ADARB1 in tumor-immune system interactions in OC patients. Furthermore, ADARB1-OE down-regulated the expression of phosphorylated AKT. Combination of ADARB1-OE and AKT inhibitor MK2206 exerted stronger cell growth inhibition. Thus, our investigation demonstrated that low levels of ADARB1 might be a potential target in the tumorigenesis and prognostic evaluation of OC patients.

Insights of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 aberrations in pan-cancer and their roles in potential clinical treatment

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alters frequently across various cancer types and is a common therapeutic target in bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) with FGFR3 variants. Although emerging evidence supports the role of FGFR3 in individual cancer types, no pan-cancer analysis is available. In this work, we used the open comprehensive datasets, covering a total of 10,953 patients with 10,967 samples across 32 TCGA cancer types, to identify the full alteration spectrum of FGFR3. FGFR3 abnormal expression, methylation patterns, alteration frequency, mutation location distribution, functional impact, and prognostic implications differed greatly from cancer to cancer. The overall alteration frequency of FGFR3 was relatively low in all cancers. Targetable mutations were mainly detected in BLCA, and S249C, Y373C, G370C, and R248C were hotspot mutations that could be targeted by an FDA approved erdafitinib. Genetic fusions were mainly observed in glioma, followed by BLCA. FGFR3-TACC3 was the most common fusion type which was proposed as novel therapeutic targets in glioma and was targetable with erdafitinib in BLCA. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) were two lung cancer subtypes, FGFR3 fusion and hotspot mutation like S249C were observed more commonly in LUSC but not in LUAD. DNA methylation was correlated with the expression of FGFR3 and its downstream genes in some tumors. FGFG3 abnormal expression and alterations exhibited clinical correlations with patient prognosis in several tumors. This work exhibited the full alteration spectrum of FGFR3 and indicated several new clues for their application as potential therapeutic targets and prognostic indicators.