Primary malignant melanoma of the trachea: A case report

Tracheostomy and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for difficult airway patient with carinal melanoma: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Anesthesia for tracheal tumor resection is challenging, particularly in patients with a difficult upper airway. We report a case of a difficult upper airway with a metastatic tracheal tumor causing near-total left bronchial obstruction and requiring emergency tracheostomy and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support for rigid bronchoscopy-assisted tumor resection.

CASE SUMMARY

A 41-year-old man with a history of right retromolar melanoma treated by tumor excision and myocutaneous flap reconstruction developed progressive dyspnea on exertion and syncope episodes. Chest computed tomography revealed a 3.0-cm tracheal mass at the carinal level, causing 90% tracheal lumen obstruction. Flexible bronchoscopy revealed a pigmented tracheal mass at the carinal level causing critical carinal obstruction. Because of aggravated symptoms, emergency rigid bronchoscopy for tumor resection and tracheal stenting were planned with standby VV-ECMO. Due to limited mouth opening, tracheostomy was necessary for rigid bronchoscopy access. While transferring the patient to the operating table, sudden desaturation occurred and awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation was performed for ventilation support. Femoral and internal jugular vein were catheterized to facilitate possible VV-ECMO deployment. During tracheostomy, progressive desaturation developed and VV-ECMO was instituted immediately. After tumor resection and tracheal stenting, VV-ECMO was weaned smoothly, and the patient was sent for intensive postoperative care. Two days later, he was transferred to the ward for palliative immunotherapy and subsequently discharged uneventfully.

CONCLUSION

In a difficult airway patient with severe airway obstruction, emergency tracheostomy for rigid bronchoscopy access and standby VV-ECMO can be life-saving, and ECMO can be weaned smoothly after tumor excision. During anesthesia for patients with tracheal tumors causing critical airway obstruction, spontaneous ventilation should be maintained at least initially, and ECMO deployment should be prepared for high-risk patients, such as those with obstructive symptoms, obstructed tracheal lumen > 50%, or distal trachea location.

Comparison of clinical features and stent placement outcomes between airway stenosis caused by primary pulmonary malignancies and that caused by primary non-pulmonary malignancies

Background:

Primary pulmonary malignancies (PPMs) and non-pulmonary malignancies (PNPMs) may result in airway stenosis requiring stenting. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the clinical features and stent placement outcomes of airway stenosis caused by PPMs and PNPMs.

Methods:

A total of 141 patients with malignant airway stenosis who underwent Micro-Tech stent placements between January 2004 and October 2017 at Department of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University were divided into PPM (n = 100) and PNPM groups (n = 41). Patients’ clinical features and stent placement outcomes were collected and analyzed. Chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables, while independent- or paired-sample t test was used to compare the continuous variables.

Results:

There were no significant differences in age, sex, treatment history, respiratory symptoms, and incidence of obstructive pneumonia between groups. Multiple airway involvement (63.0% vs. 31.7%; χ² = 11.459, P = 0.001) and atelectasis (17.0% vs. 2.4%; χ² = 5.536, P = 0.019) were more common in the PPM group, while extraluminal obstruction (24.4% vs. 6.0%; χ² = 8.033, P = 0.005) was more common in the PNPM group. Before stenting, the American Thoracic Society Dyspnea Index (ADI) and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores showed no significant differences between groups (all P > 0.05). After stenting, a satisfactory rate of symptom improvement was achieved in both groups (98.0% and 100.0% in the PPM and PNPM groups, respectively; χ² = 0.016, P = 0.898); ADI and KPS scores, which showed no significant differences between groups (all P > 0.05), were significantly improved in each group (all P < 0.001). Complications after stenting could be effectively managed using bronchoscopic procedures.

Conclusions:

Among cases of malignant airway stenosis requiring stenting, those caused by PPM are more likely to involve multiple airways and are associated with atelectasis, while those caused by PNPM are more likely to cause extraluminal obstruction. Micro-Tech stent placement has the same immediate effect in terms of improvement in respiratory symptoms and performance status for both malignant airway stenosis caused by PPM and that caused by PNPM.