Short-term effect analysis of radiofrequency ablation combined chemotherapy on middle and late period non-small cell lung cancer

Survival after radiofrequency ablation and/or chemotherapy for lung cancer and pulmonary metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and chemotherapy are used to treat lung cancer or pulmonary metastases, but no direct comparison of overall survival (OS) has been published. The present study aimed to assess the OS of RFA and/or chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer or pulmonary metastases who were not candidates for surgical resection.

Methods

To identify relevant studies, the following databases were electronically searched from their inception to 31 March 2023: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid, ScienceDirect, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, Wanfang Database, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Chictr.org. Manual retrieval was also conducted. We used published hazard ratios (HRs) if available or estimates from other survival data.

Results

A total of 1,387 participants from 14 trials were included in the final analysis. Patients treated with RFA combined with chemotherapy significantly improved OS compared with those treated with chemotherapy alone [HR 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.61; p < 0.00001], with an absolute difference at 12 months of 29.6% (95% CI 23.7-35.5), at 24 months of 19.2% (95% CI 10.1-28.2), and at 36 months of 22.9% (95% CI 12.0-33.7). No statistically significant difference was observed in the subgroups of case type, cancer type, chemotherapy drugs, and tumor size. The HR for OS with RFA plus chemotherapy vs. RFA alone was 0.53 (95% CI 0.41-0.70; p < 0.00001), corresponding to a 27.1% (95% CI 18.3-35.8), 31.0% (95% CI 19.9-41.9), and 24.9% (95% CI 15.0-34.7) absolute difference in survival at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis by geographic region and TNM stage showed that RFA combined with chemotherapy still significantly improved OS compared to RFA. The HR of RFA vs. chemotherapy was 0.98 (95% CI 0.60-1.60; p = 0.94), with an absolute difference at 12 months of 1.4% (95% CI -19.2 to 22.1), at 24 months of 7.8% (95% CI -11.3 to 26.8), and at 36 months of 0.3% (95% CI -13.2 to 13.8). The overall indirect comparison of OS for RFA vs. chemotherapy was 0.95 (95% CI 0.72-1.26; p = 0.74). Data on progression-free survival were not sufficiently reported.

Conclusion

RFA combined with chemotherapy might be a better treatment option for patients with lung cancer or pulmonary metastases than chemotherapy alone or RFA alone. The comparison between RFA and/or chemotherapy remains to be specifically tested.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=335032, identifier CRD42022335032.

The efficacy and safety of thermal ablation for patients with lung malignancy: a meta-analysis of 12 studies in China

BACKGROUND

Thermal ablation has been increasingly used in the treatment of lung cancer in recent years. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of thermal ablation plus chemotherapy as compared with chemotherapy alone in treating patients with lung malignancy in China based on current evidence.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for clinical reports. Additional literature search was also performed by searching the reference list of included studies and latest reviews. Raw data including objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and the incidence of major complication were extracted and pooled.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies in China including 1282 patients with lung malignancy were included in this meta-analysis. The number of studies that reported data of objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and major complication was 8, 7, 7, 6 and 7, respectively. The combination therapy of thermal ablation plus chemotherapy showed a significantly better efficacy in improving objective response rate (odds ratio = 2.73; P < 0.001) and disease control rate (odds ratio = 2.43; P < 0.001) as compared with chemotherapy alone. Thermal ablation was also a significant protective factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.43; P < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.49; P < 0.001). Besides, thermal ablation did not increase the risk of major complication (odds ratio = 0.75; P = 0.252).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis based on these studies in China suggested that thermal ablation is a promising technique to provide better disease response and survival outcomes for patients with lung malignancy. Thermal ablation is worth further promotion in treating lung malignancy and application in clinical practice.

Image-guided percutaneous ablation for lung malignancies

Image-guided percutaneous lung ablation has proven to be an alternative and effective strategy in the treatment of lung cancer and other lung malignancies. Radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation are widely used ablation modalities in clinical practice that can be performed along or combined with other treatment modalities. In this context, this article will review the application of different ablation strategies in lung malignancies.

Survival benefit of thermal ablation combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the survival benefit of thermal ablation (TA) plus chemotherapy for Stage-IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, data of Stage-IV NSCLC patients receiving different treatment modalities (TA plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy) from 2004 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed using propensity-score matching (PSM) for covariates. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test for intergroup comparison of overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and subgroup analyses in the PSM cohort evaluated possible survival benefits. Cox proportional risk models evaluated independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Among 52,574 patients, 152 received TA plus chemotherapy. After PSM, the TA plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups included 150 and 445 patients, respectively. Compared to the chemotherapy group, the TA plus chemotherapy group had better OS (p = 0.042) and LCSS (p = 0.031), especially in patients aged 70 and older in age-stratified subgroup analysis; no statistically significant beneficial trend was noted for patients younger than 70 years. Subgroup analysis by tumor size showed superior OS and LCSS with TA plus chemotherapy than chemotherapy for tumors ≤3.0 cm; however, no significant difference was found in subgroups with larger tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that TA plus chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for OS and LCSS (hazard ratio 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.59-0.84] and 0.70 [0.58-0.84], respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TA plus chemotherapy is a potential treatment option for Stage-IV NSCLC, especially for patients aged 70 or older with tumor size ≤3 cm.

Combination therapy involving radiofrequency ablation and targeted chemotherapy with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and cisplatin in a rabbit VX2 lung tumor model

Objective

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is less effective for large tumors > 3 cm in diameter. Various studies of combination therapy using RFA and other treatments have been conducted to improve the results of RFA treatment of lung tumors, survival was extended in a tumor model when RFA was followed by concomitant use of systemic chemotherapy. Bevacizumab (BCM) is a one of molecular target drugs. Numerous clinical trials and reports have shown BCM’s effect when used in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in lung tumor. Our objective is to evaluate the survival of concurrent, combined use of radiofrequency ablation and BCM, and platinum-doublet chemotherapy [CDDP/paclitaxel (PTX)] in a rabbit VX2 lung tumor.

Results

Survival times of the RFA alone, CDDP/PTX, CDDP/PTX/BCM, RFA/CDDP/PTX, and RFA/CDDP/PTX/BCM groups were significantly prolonged compared to that of the control group (P = 0.0055, P = 0.0055, P = 0.0004, P = 0.0002, P = 0.0019, respectively). Survival of the RFA/CDDP/PTX/BCM group was not significantly prolonged compared to the RFA alone (P = 0.53) and CDDP/PTX/BCM group (P = 0.68), while showing a significantly shorter survival time than that of the RFA/CDDP/PTX group (P = 0.017). The addition to BCM with combination RFA and systemic therapy with CDDP/PTX did not have a positive effect on survival.

Small cell lung cancer treated by radiofrequency ablation: A case report

RATIONALE

The morbidity and mortality of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), an uncommon malignancy of the lung, remain high. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) creates heat to destroy cancer cells and is usually used to treat non-SCLC, but not SCLC.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 85-year-old male presented with a 2-month history of a productive cough with white phlegm and a 2-day history of hemoptysis. Chest computed tomography revealed a mass in the right lower lobe.

DIAGNOSES

An excision biopsy of the mass showed SCLC.

INTERVENTIONS

We treated the tumor with RFA.

OUTCOMES

At the 2-year follow-up examination, the efficacy of the RFA was evaluated as a partial response.

LESSONS

RFA can improve the prognosis of SCLC and should be considered for its treatment.