Melanoma antigen-encoding gene family member A1-6 and hTERT in the detection of circulating tumor cells following CD45- depletion and RNA extraction

Prospects of liquid biopsy in the prognosis and clinical management of gastrointestinal cancers

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers account for one-fourth of the global cancer incidence and are incriminated to cause one-third of cancer-related deaths. GI cancer includes esophageal, gastric, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers, mostly diagnosed at advanced stages due to a lack of accurate markers for early stages. The invasiveness of diagnostic methods like colonoscopy for solid biopsy reduces patient compliance as it cannot be frequently used to screen patients. Therefore, minimally invasive approaches like liquid biopsy may be explored for screening and early identification of gastrointestinal cancers. Liquid biopsy involves the qualitative and quantitative determination of certain cancer-specific biomarkers in body fluids such as blood, serum, saliva, and urine to predict disease progression, therapeutic tolerance, toxicities, and recurrence by evaluating minimal residual disease and its correlation with other clinical features. In this review, we deliberate upon various tumor-specific cellular and molecular entities such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor-educated platelets (TEPs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), exosomes, and exosome-derived biomolecules and cite recent advances pertaining to their use in predicting disease progression, therapy response, or risk of relapse. We also discuss the technical challenges associated with translating liquid biopsy into clinical settings for various clinical applications in gastrointestinal cancers.

Advances in the Biology, Detection Techniques, and Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumor Cells

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) play a crucial role in tumor recurrence and metastasis, and their early detection has shown remarkable benefits in clinical theranostics. However, CTCs are extremely rare, thus detecting them in the blood is very challenging. New CTC detection techniques are continuously being developed, enabling deeper analysis of CTC biology and potential clinical application. This article reviews current CTC detection techniques and their clinical application. CTCs have provided, and will continue to provide, important insights into the process of metastasis, which could lead to development of new therapies for different cancers.

Circulating tumor cells: biology and clinical significance

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are tumor cells that have sloughed off the primary tumor and extravasate into and circulate in the blood. Understanding of the metastatic cascade of CTCs has tremendous potential for the identification of targets against cancer metastasis. Detecting these very rare CTCs among the massive blood cells is challenging. However, emerging technologies for CTCs detection have profoundly contributed to deepening investigation into the biology of CTCs and have facilitated their clinical application. Current technologies for the detection of CTCs are summarized herein, together with their advantages and disadvantages. The detection of CTCs is usually dependent on molecular markers, with the epithelial cell adhesion molecule being the most widely used, although molecular markers vary between different types of cancer. Properties associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stemness have been identified in CTCs, indicating their increased metastatic capacity. Only a small proportion of CTCs can survive and eventually initiate metastases, suggesting that an interaction and modulation between CTCs and the hostile blood microenvironment is essential for CTC metastasis. Single-cell sequencing of CTCs has been extensively investigated, and has enabled researchers to reveal the genome and transcriptome of CTCs. Herein, we also review the clinical applications of CTCs, especially for monitoring response to cancer treatment and in evaluating prognosis. Hence, CTCs have and will continue to contribute to providing significant insights into metastatic processes and will open new avenues for useful clinical applications.

Circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the main causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality across the globe. Although serum biomarkers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA-199) have been prevalently used as biomarkers in various cancers, they are neither very sensitive nor highly specific. Repeated tissue biopsies at different times of the disease can be uncomfortable for cancer patients. Additionally, the existence of tumor heterogeneity and the results of local biopsy provide limited information about the overall tumor biology. Against this backdrop, it is necessary to look for reliable and noninvasive biomarkers of CRC. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which depart from a primary tumor, enter the bloodstream, and imitate metastasis, have a great potential for precision medicine in patients with CRC. Various efficient CTC isolation platforms have been developed to capture and identify CTCs. The count of CTCs, as well as their biological characteristics and genomic heterogeneity, can be used for the early diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of treatment response in CRC. This study reviewed the existing CTC isolation techniques and their applications in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CRC. The study also presented their limitations and provided future research directions.

Detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with breast cancer using the conditionally reprogrammed cell culture method and reverse transcription-PCR of hTERT and MAGE A1-6

The present study aimed to verify the efficacy of the conditionally reprogrammed cell (CRC) culture method for the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in breast cancer. CTCs were isolated from the peripheral blood of patients with breast cancer, and culture of the collected CTCs was performed according to the conditional reprogramming protocol. Total RNA was extracted from cultured CTCs, and the hTERT and MAGE A1-6 genes were amplified using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). In addition, RNA extraction from another blood sample was performed and the expression of the two genes was analyzed by RT-PCR only. Following CRC culture, grown CTCs were observed in 7 samples (23.3%). The CTC detection rates by RT-PCR for the hTERT and MAGE A1-6 genes in CTCs grown using the CRC culture method were 26.7 and 10.0%, respectively. The positive expression rates for the hTERT and MAGE genes in CTCs assessed by RT-PCR only were 44.1 and 23.5%, respectively. When combining the positive expression rates of RT-PCR only and CRC culture for the hTERT and MAGE A1-6 genes, CTC detection rates increased to 53.3 and 23.3%, respectively. Additionally, when combining the positive expression rates of the two genes by either method, the CTC detection rate was the highest value observed. In conclusion, the present study revealed the potential of CRC culture in the detection of CTCs in breast cancer. Furthermore, a combination of CRC culture and RT-PCR for the hTERT and MAGE A1-6 genes is useful in enhancing the detection rate of CTCs in the blood.

MAGE-A genes as predictors of the outcome of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the head and neck area. Melanoma-associated antigens A (MAGE-A) are strictly tumor-specific and are expressed in several types of tumors. To date, no studies have reported the potential of MAGE-A genes as markers for circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with LSCC. The present study aimed to evaluate the expression and the possible prognostic significance of MAGE-A in the peripheral blood of patients with LSCC. In the present study, the expression of MAGE-A genes was determined by multiplex semi-nested PCR and restriction endonuclease treatment of the peripheral blood of patients with LSCC. The association between MAGE-A gene expression and clinicopathological parameters and prognosis was evaluated. The results demonstrated that the expression of MAGE-A was associated with the predictors that indicate poor prognosis. The expression levels of MAGE-A and each individual MAGE-A gene were also associated with a shorter overall survival time of patients with LSCC. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested that the expression of MAGE-A genes may be a potential prognostic marker for patients with LSCC.

Associations between the cyclooxygenase-2 expression in circulating tumor cells and the clinicopathological features of patients with colorectal cancer

While previous studies have shown that the number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) alone is not sufficient to reflect tumor progression and that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression is correlated with colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis, COX-2 expression status and its potential functions in CTCs of CRC patients are unknown. Here, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype-based subsets of CTCs and the COX-2 expression status in CTCs were identified and their potential clinical values were assessed in 91 CRC patients. CTCs were enumerated in peripheral blood and subsets of CTCs (epithelial [eCTCs], mesenchymal [mCTCs], and biophenotypic [bCTCs]) and the COX-2 expression status were determined using the RNA in situ hybridization method. CTCs were detected in 80.2% (73 of 91) patients. Neither the total CTC nor eCTC numbers were found to significantly associate with any of the clinicopathological features. However, the number of mCTCs was significantly associated with distance metastasis (P = 0.035) and had a trend of being associated with lymph node metastasis ( P = 0.055). Among the 73 patients enrolled for evaluating COX-2 expression, 52.5% (38 of 73) were found to express COX-2 in CTCs, and COX-2 expression in CTCs was not found to associate with the clinicopathological factors. However, COX-2 expression in mCTCs tended to have a higher rate in patients with metastasis compared with those without metastasis (72.0% vs 42.8%; P = 0.072). Furthermore, COX-2 expression and mCTC marker expression correlated positively ( R = 0.287; P = 0.017). Further studies are required to investigate the clinical value of the expression of COX-2 in mCTCs, especially in CRC patients with the advanced tumor stage and distant metastasis.