Meta-analysis of the role of bevacizumab in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

Achieving long-term survival in extensive-stage SCLC: a case report and mini literature review

Managing extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) has long been challenging for clinicians and oncologists due to its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. We report a case of a 41-year-old female with ES-SCLC who survived for six years, defying the disease's typically poor prognosis. Through a heavy treatment strategy involving chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, the patient experienced robust responses and avoided distant metastasis, including brain involvement. The long-term survival case in SCLC highlights the need for further research into personalized strategies and prognostic biomarkers. This case holds significant value for both clinicians and researchers as it challenges the conventional strategies for ES-SCLC and sets the stage for future evidence-based studies aimed at extending survival in SCLC.

Anlotinib plus platinum‐etoposide as a first‐line treatment for extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer: A single‐arm trial

Background

Anlotinib as a third‐line or beyond therapy for extensive‐stage small‐cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) was studied. This single‐arm phase II trial was to investigate the value of anlotinib plus platinum‐etoposide as first‐line treatment in ES SCLC.

Methods

The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), time to progression (TTP), duration of remission (DoR), and safety. The subgroups of preset liver metastasis and brain metastasis were analyzed.

Results

In 35 ES‐SCLC patients, the median PFS, ORR, DCR, and OS were 8.02 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.90–9.66], 85.71% (95% CI: 69.74–95.19), 94.29% (95% CI: 80.84–99.30), and 15.87 months (95% CI: 10.38–18.89), respectively. The median PFS in the liver metastasis and brain metastasis subgroups was 7.33 months (95% CI: 4.76–9.69) and 7.34 months (95% CI: 5.68–9.20), respectively. The most common AEs with grade 3–4 were hand–foot syndrome (17%), granulocytosis (17%), stomatitis (14%), hypertriglyceridemia (11%), hypercholesterolemia (11%), as well as nausea and vomiting (11%), and no grade 5 AEs were recorded.

Conclusions

Anlotinib combined with platinum‐etoposide provided an effective and safe therapy for patients with ES‐SCLC.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib as second or later-line therapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a prospective, exploratory, single-arm, multi-center clinical trial

Background

A paucity of strategies exist for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients who fail the first-line chemotherapy. Apatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), which has been demonstrated to have active anti-tumor activity in ES-SCLC when used only or combined with PD-1 inhibitors or chemotherapy with good tolerance. However, the efficacy and safety of apatinib monotherapy is unclear in second-line or beyond treatment of ES-SCLC.

Methods

In this prospective, exploratory, single-arm, multi-center study, eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed ES-SCLC, and had progressed on, or were intolerant to previous systemic treatment. Patients received apatinib 500 mg (orally qd, every 4 weeks a cycle). The efficacy was assessed after 1 cycle and then every 2 cycles based on computed tomography imaging per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The adverse events (AEs) were assessed per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE 4.0). This study is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number ChiCTR-OPC-17013964.

Results

From 28 July 2017 to 21 June 2019, 62 patients were screened for eligibility, among whom 57 patients were available for efficacy and safety analysis. The objective response rate (ORR) was 14.3% and disease control rate (DCR) was 79.6%. The median PFS was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.3-8.0 months] and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 months (95% CI: 7.5-24.0 months). Among the participants who received apatinib as second-line treatment, the median PFS and OS were 6.1 months (95% CI: 2.6-7.6 months) and 12.0 months (95% CI: 7.9 months to not reached), respectively. The most common AEs of all grades were anemia (36.8%), hypertension (33.3%), fatigue (31.6%), blood bilirubin increased (22.8%), elevated transaminase (19.3%), and hand-foot syndrome (17.54%). Grade 3 AEs included 2 (3.5%) cases of hypertension and 1 (1.8%) case of fatigue. No grade 4/5 AEs were observed.

Conclusions

Apatinib showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in pretreated ES-SCLC patients with tolerable toxicities. Further larger scale studies are warranted to demonstrate the efficacy of apatinib.

Apatinib with etoposide capsules as a third- or further-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial

Background

Patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have a particularly poor prognosis. And the treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC are limited. Thus, we conducted an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus etoposide capsules as the third- or further-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients.

Methods

Patients with ES-SCLC who experienced disease progression following 2 to 3 previous therapies from 11 medical centers in China were enrolled to receive apatinib (250 mg/d, continuously) and etoposide capsules (50 mg/d, on day 1–21, per 28 days). The treatment continued until disease progression, treatment intolerance, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Fifty-six patients with relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC were enrolled from January 2018 to February 2020 and 53 of them were eventually included in the evaluation population. The median follow-up was 9.8 months. At the data cut-off time (March 5, 2020), 39 patients (74%) had died and 44 (83%) had progressed. The median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.1–3.9) and the median OS was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.6–6.4). No complete responses were seen. Eleven patients (21%) showed a best response of partial response and 37 (70%) patients achieved stable disease. The ORR was 20.8% (11/53), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 90.6% (48/53). The 6-month OS rate was 40.1% (95% CI, 26.2–54). After 12 months, the OS rate was 18.4% (95% CI, 4.7–32.1). Possible treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events included leukopenia [8 (15.1%)], neutropenia [7 (13.2%)], anemia [4 (7.4%)], and hand-foot syndrome [2 (3.8%)]. During the study, no mortality occurred as a consequence of treatment.

Conclusions

Apatinib combined with etoposide capsules exhibits efficacy and has an acceptable safety profile. It could be used as a later-line treatment for ES-SCLC patients who have been heavily pretreated with standard therapies. Further exploration of apatinib combined with etoposide capsules in phase III trials is warranted.

A Prospective Study of Apatinib in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of Two or More Lines of Chemotherapy

Background

Because of rapid disease progression and lack of optimal treatment strategies beyond the second‐line, the prognosis of patients with extensive‐stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) still remains depressing. Alternative treatment strategies are required to improve their prognosis. In this prospective clinical study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of single‐agent apatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as a treatment option for patients with ES‐SCLC after failure of at least two prior chemotherapy regimens.

Materials and Methods

Twenty‐two patients with ES‐SCLC treated with 500 mg single‐agent apatinib as subsequent‐line regimen in our institution from November 2016 to August 2018 were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Clinical outcomes included partial response in 3 patients (13.6%), stable disease in 18 patients (81.8%), and disease progression in 1 patient (4.5%), with an ORR of 13.6% and DCR of 95.5%. The median PFS and OS were 5.4 and 10.0 months, respectively. Apatinib demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile, with grade I–III secondary hypertension and proteinuria as the most common AEs. No grade IV and V AEs were observed among the patients. Multivariate analysis revealed secondary hypertension as an independent predictor of OS (p = .047); however, the association became insignificant after Q correction (p = .455).

Conclusions

Apatinib was safe and effective in the management of patients with ES‐SCLC and can be considered as a treatment option after failure of at least two prior chemotherapy regimens. http://ClinicalTrials.govidentifier. NCT02995187

Implications for Practice

This study indicated the acceptable toxicity profile and promising efficacy of apatinib in the management of patients with extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer after failure from at least two prior chemotherapy regimens. Secondary hypertension can be a potential prognostic factor for apatinib treatment.

Alternative treatment strategies are needed to improve prognosis for patients with small‐cell lung cancer. This article evaluates the feasibility of single‐agent apatinib as a treatment option for patients with extensive‐stage small‐cell lung cancer.

The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients: a large population-based study

AIM

To analyze the metastasis patterns and prognosis differences for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Log-rank tests were used to calculate and compare survival estimates. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the prognosis factors.

RESULTS

The liver was the most common metastatic site, and lung was the least common. In two metastatic sites, liver and bone metastases were the most common combination of sites. An isolated liver metastasis had the worst overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among metastatic sites (both p < 0.001). Liver and lung metastases were associated with worse CSS (p < 0.039) and OS (p < 0.015). However, for patients with three metastatic sites showed no statistical differences in their CSS and OS (all, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients with metastasis to the liver alone or in combination with other organs appear to have worse outcomes.