Hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy and response evaluation in patients with gastric cancer and malignant ascites

Network and pathway-based analysis of genes associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Although diagnostic methods and treatments have improved over the last few years, the 5-year survival rate of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients remains generally poor. The development of high-throughput technology has facilitated great achievements in localization of ESCC-related genes. To take a further step toward a thorough understanding of ESCC at a molecular level, the potential pathogenesis of ESCC needs to be deciphered.

Methods

The interaction of ESCC-related genes was explored by collecting genes associated with ESCC and then performing gene enrichment assays, pathway enrichment assays, pathway crosstalk analysis, and extraction of ESCC-specific subnetwork to describe the relevant biochemical processes.

Results

Through Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis, many molecular functions related to response to chemical, cellular response to stimulus, and cell proliferation were found to be significantly enriched in ESCC-related genes. The results of pathway and pathway crosstalk analysis showed that pathways associated with multiple malignant tumors, the immune system, and metabolic processes were significantly enriched in ESCC-related genes. Through the analysis of specific subnetworks, we obtained some novel ESCC-related potential genes, such as MUC13, GSTO1, FIN, GRB2, CDC25C, and others.

Conclusions

The molecular mechanism of ESCC is extremely complex. Some inducing factors change the expression status of many genes. The abnormal expression of genes mediates the biological processes involved in immunity and metabolism, apoptosis, and cell proliferation, leading to the occurrence of tumors. The genes MUC13, RYK, and FIN may be potential prognostic indicators of ESCC; GRB2 and CDC25C may be potential targets of ESCC in proliferation. Our work may provide valuable information for further understanding the molecular mechanisms for the development of ESCC.

Xiaoaiping improves the general state of rats with malignant ascites secondary to gastric cancer by blocking the TGF-β1 signaling pathway

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of Xiaoaiping on the general state of rats with malignant ascites secondary to gastric cancer by blocking the transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) signaling pathway.

METHODS

Fifty healthy Wistar rats were randomly divided into 5 groups, with 10 rats in each group. After successful modeling, 0.2 g/(20 g∙d), 0.4 g/(20 g∙d) and 0.8 g/(20 g∙d) of Xiaoaiping injections were administrated at the low dose group (LDG), medium dose group (MDG) and high dose group (HDG), respectively. The model group (MG) was injected intraperitoneally with the same amount of sterile normal saline for 8 d. Rats in the control group (CG) were healthy without any treatment. The general states (mental state, dietary habits, reactions and body shape) of rats in each group were observed. The abdominal circumference, platelet (PLT) count, white blood cell (WBC) count, serum ferritin (SF), ascites volume, cell survival rate, and expression levels of TGF-β1 signaling pathway (TGF-β1, Smad2) were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

PLT and WBC counts in the MG were lower than those in the CG. Ascites volume, tumor cell survival rate, and SF in the MG were higher than those in the LDG, MDG and HDG (P<0.05). Thymus index in the LDG, MDG and HDG were significantly higher than that in the MG (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the spleen indices among the groups (P>0.05). The kidney index, serum creatinine and urea nitrogen levels in LDG, MDG and HDG were significantly lower than those of MG (P<0.05). The LDG, MDG and HDG exhibited significantly higher peripheral blood CD4+ cells and CD4+/CD8+, and lower CD8+ level, as compared with the MG (P<0.05). The levels of serum interferon γ (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the LDG, MDG and HDG were higher than those in the MG (P<0.05). The ascites volume and tumor cell survival rate were decreased sequentially in the LDG, MDG and HDG (P<0.05). The MG had higher mRNA levels of TGF-β1 and Smad2 than the CG (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in TGF-β1 and Smad2 between the LDG and MG (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Xiaoaiping could significantly reduce the ascites volume in rats with gastric cancer, inhibit the production of tumor cells in the abdominal cavity, and improve the general state of rats in a dose-dependent manner. The mechanism may be related to the down-regulation of the mRNA level of TGF-β1 and Smad2.

Neoadjuvant Intraperitoneal and Systemic Chemotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy With Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) remains debatable. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) versus neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NSC) for GCPM.

METHODS

Patients of GCPM received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 between January 2011 and June 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was carried out to reduce the selection bias. Multivariate Cox regression model was applied to screen the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

After PSM processing, 71 patients in each group were matched among the 186 GCPM patients included. NIPS yielded a better ascites and cytology response to chemotherapy, higher conversion resection rate and R0 resection rate than NSC. The overall survival (OS) rate in NIPS group was better than that in NSC group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the P stage, ascites response, conversion surgery rate and R0 resection rate were independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis indicated that NIPS showed a survival benefit over NSC only in patients with cT3-4a, P1-2, whose cytology turned negative, and who received conversion surgery; while not in patients with cT4b, P0 or P3, whose cytology did not turn negative, or who did not receive conversion surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPS is a safe and feasible treatment for GCPM, which showed more benefit than NSC.

Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for malignant ascites from colorectal cancer - a randomized study

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of different timings of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in controlling malignant ascites caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is not well defined. The study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of different timings of CRS with HIPEC for malignant ascites caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis from CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a preliminary randomized controlled study performed at the Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center of the Cancer Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (China) from December 2008 to December 2016. The patients were randomized to: CRS, followed by HIPEC (CRS+HIPEC; n = 14), and ultrasound-guided HIPEC, followed by CRS 1 to 2 weeks later (HIPEC+ delayed cytoreductive surgery (dCRS) group, n = 14). The endpoints were complete remission rate of ascites, successful complete CRS rate, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Malignant ascites in all patients showed complete remission; the total effective rate was 100%. Complete CRS was not feasible in any patient. The median follow-up of the 2 groups was 41.9 and 42.3 months in the CRS+HIPEC and HIPEC+dCRS groups, respectively. Overall survival was 14.5 (95%CI: 7-19 months) and 14.3 months (95%CI: 4-21 months) (P > .05). The adverse effects of HIPEC were manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS+HIPEC and HIPEC+dCRS have the same efficacy in controlling malignant ascites caused by CRC and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The timing of CRS and HIPEC does not prolong the survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from CRC, even when a complete CRS is not feasible.

Issues on peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer: an update

Background

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is one of the most common forms of metastasis with a very poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer (GC). The mechanisms, diagnosis, and management of PM remain controversial.

Main body

Stephen Paget’s “seed-and-soil” hypothesis gives us an illustration of the mechanisms of PM. Recently, hematogenous metastasis and exosomes from GC are identified as novel mechanisms for PM. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional imaging modalities for PM is not satisfactory, but texture analysis may be a useful adjunct for the prediction of PM. Biological markers in peritoneal washings are helpful in identifying patients at high risk of PM, but many limitations remain to be overcome. Response of PM from systemic chemotherapy alone is very limited. However, conversion therapy is confirmed to be safe and able to prolong the survival of GC patients with PM. As an important part of conversion therapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy with taxanes has become an ideal approach with several advantages. Additionally, gastrectomy should be considered in patients who would tolerate surgery if a remarkable response to chemotherapy was observed.

Conclusion

Texture analysis is a reliable adjunct for the prediction of PM, and conversion therapy provides a new choice for GC patients with PM. The underlying mechanisms and new biological markers for GC patients with PM should be the direction of future studies. Furthermore, significant aspects of conversion therapy, such as timing and method of the operation, and the indications remain to be clarified.

Prognostic significance of malignant ascites in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence indicates that malignant ascites may be associated with the high malignancy and poor prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastasis (PM), but no robust consensus has been reached until now.

AIM

To evaluate the prognostic significance of malignant ascites in GC patients with PM.

METHODS

Two independent authors conducted database searches. The searches were performed in the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases, and the terms used to search included stomach neoplasms, GC, ascites, peritoneal effusion, survival, and survival analysis. Outcomes included overall survival and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Three pairs of comparisons for measuring survival were made: (1) Patients with ascites vs those without ascites; (2) Patients with massive ascites vs those with mild to moderate ascites; and (3) Patients with massive ascites vs those with no to moderate ascites.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles including fifteen studies were considered in the final analysis. Among them, nine studies assessed the difference in prognosis between patients with and without malignant ascites. A pooled HR of 1.63 (95%CI: 1.47-1.82, P < 0.00001) indicated that GC patients with malignant ascites had a relatively poor prognosis compared to patients without ascites. We also found that the prognosis of GC patients with malignant ascites was related to the volume of ascites in the six other studies.

CONCLUSION

GC patients with malignant ascites tend to have a worse prognosis, and the volume of ascites has an impact on GC outcomes.

Postoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion improve survival for advanced gastric cancer

To evaluate the value of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) in the treatment of gastric cancer.Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignancy with poor prognosis, recent years have demonstrated advances in the use of IPHP for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but the outcome is controversial.Between January 2015 and January 2017, 134 patients with GC were treated with IPHP in our surgery department, 130 of them were advanced GC patients, and other 1439 cases were treated without IPHP for comparison. In this retrospective cohort study, demographic, perioperative data, and follow-up data were analyzed by univariant analysis, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analysis.We found the 1-year survival in IPHP group was significantly longer than it in non-IPHP group (85.5% vs 73.8%, P = .027). and IPHP decreased mortality 1.8 times in 2-year course (OR = 0.556, P = .004). The incidence rate of total complications in IPHP group was similar to that in the Non-IPHP group (6.67% vs 7.46%, respectively; P = .718). We classified all patients into four groups, operation alone, operation + chemotherapy, operation + IPHP, and operation + IPHP + chemotherapy. The 1-year survival in the groups was 70.2%, 77.5%, 83.1%, and 93.5%, respectively (P = .001), compared with the group of operation alone, the 2-year mortality risk was decreased 1.76 times (OR = 0.569, P = .030) and 2.59 times (OR = 0.385, P = .022) in operation + IPHP group and operation + IPHP + chemotherapy group.Our results suggest that IPHP could contribute to improve survival of patients with gastric cancer. And the modality of operation + IPHP + chemotherapy is the optimal treatment modality for gastric cancer.

Can hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy effectively control gastric cancer-associated peritoneal carcinomatosis?

Gastric cancer-associated peritoneal carcinomatosis leads to a poor prognosis and low quality of life. The current systemic chemotherapy processes cannot effectively improve survival. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been used as an alternative treatment to control this disease through recurrence prevention, definitive therapeutic modality, and symptom palliation. Although HIPEC has been demonstrated to yield favorable results mainly in some Asian studies, widespread adoption of this treatment is still debatable before larger prospective randomized controlled clinical trials confirm its effectiveness.

Clinical efficacy of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis: Impact on immune function and prognosis

AIM

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer (GC) peritoneal metastasis and its impact on immune function and prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 113 patients with GC treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between June 2010 and March 2013. The patients were randomly divided into an observation group (54 cases) and a control group (59 cases). Patients in the control group were treated with conventional intravenous chemotherapy, and patients in the observation group were treated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy. The clinical efficacy, related indicators of recurrence and metastasis, tumor markers, T-lymphocyte subsets, quality of life, and occurrence of adverse reactions after chemotherapy was compared between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

The total effective rate and disease control rate in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of serum carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), CA724, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), osteopontin (OPN), soluble apoptotic factor (sFas), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). CD3⁺ T cells, CD4⁺ T cells, CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio, and B cells in the peripheral blood were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group, while CD8⁺ T cells and NK cells were significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The improvement of KPS score after treatment, the recurrence rate at 2 years, the 3-year survival rate, and the 5-year survival rate were significantly better in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions after chemotherapy was not statistically different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy can improve clinical efficacy, tumor markers and related indicators of recurrence and metastasis, as well as the patient's immune function and quality of life of patients with GC peritoneal metastasis, without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions.

Gold nanorods together with HSP inhibitor-VER-155008 micelles for colon cancer mild-temperature photothermal therapy

Enhancing the heat-sensitivity of tumor cells provides an alternative solution to maintaining the therapeutic outcome of photothermal therapy (PTT). In this study, we constructed a therapeutic system, which was composed of methoxy-polyethylene-glycol-coated-gold-nanorods (MPEG-AuNR) and VER-155008-micelles, to evaluate the effect of VER-155008 on the sensitivity of tumor cells to heat, and further investigate the therapeutic outcome of MPEG-AuNR mediated PTT combined with VER-155008- micelles. VER-155008- micelles down-regulate the expression of heat shock proteins and attenuate the heat-resistance of tumor cell. The survival of HCT116 cells treated with VER-155008- micelles under 45 °C is equal to that treated with high temperature hyperthermia (55 °C) in vitro. Furthermore, we proved either the MPEG-AuNR or VER-155008- micelles can be accumulate in the tumor site by photoacoustic imaging and fluorescent imaging. In vivo anti-cancer evaluation showed that tumor size remarkably decreased (smaller than 100 mm³ or vanished) when treated with combing 45 °C mild PTT system, which contrasted to the tumor size when treated with individual 45 °C mild PTT (around 500 nm³) or normal saline as control (larger than 2000 nm³). These results proved that the VER-155008- micelles can attenuate the heat-resistance of tumor cells and enhance the therapeutic outcome of mild-temperature photothermal therapy.