1
|
Miles GJ, Powley I, Mohammed S, Howells L, Pringle JH, Hammonds T, MacFarlane M, Pritchard C. Evaluating and comparing immunostaining and computational methods for spatial profiling of drug response in patient-derived explants. J Transl Med 2021; 101:396-407. [PMID: 33318618 PMCID: PMC7116793 DOI: 10.1038/s41374-020-00511-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-derived explants (PDEs) represent the direct culture of fragments of freshly-resected tumour tissue under conditions that retain the original architecture of the tumour. PDEs have advantages over other preclinical cancer models as platforms for predicting patient-relevant drug responses in that they preserve the tumour microenvironment and tumour heterogeneity. At endpoint, PDEs may either be processed for generation of histological sections or homogenised and processed for 'omic' evaluation of biomarker expression. A significant advantage of spatial profiling is the ability to co-register drug responses with tumour pathology, tumour heterogeneity and changes in the tumour microenvironment. Spatial profiling of PDEs relies on the utilisation of robust immunostaining approaches for validated biomarkers and incorporation of appropriate image analysis methods to quantitatively and qualitatively monitor changes in biomarker expression in response to anti-cancer drugs. Automation of immunostaining and image analysis would provide a significant advantage for the drug discovery pipeline and therefore, here, we have sought to optimise digital pathology approaches. We compare three image analysis software platforms (QuPath, ImmunoRatio and VisioPharm) for evaluating Ki67 as a marker for proliferation, cleaved PARP (cPARP) as a marker for apoptosis and pan-cytokeratin (CK) as a marker for tumour areas and find that all three generate comparable data to the views of a histomorphometrist. We also show that Virtual Double Staining of sequential sections by immunohistochemistry results in imperfect section alignment such that CK-stained tumour areas are over-estimated. Finally, we demonstrate that multi-immunofluorescence combined with digital image analysis is a superior method for monitoring multiple biomarkers simultaneously in tumour and stromal areas in PDEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth J Miles
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK.
| | - Ian Powley
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Seid Mohammed
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
- Leicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Medical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - Lynne Howells
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - J Howard Pringle
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Tim Hammonds
- Cancer Research UK Therapeutic Discovery Laboratories, London Bioscience Innovation Centre, 2 Royal College Street, London, NW1 0NH, UK
- Locki Therapeutics, 2 Royal College Street, London, NW1 0NH, UK
| | - Marion MacFarlane
- MRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Catrin Pritchard
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jun E, Park Y, Lee W, Kwon J, Lee S, Kim MB, Lee JS, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Hoffman RM, Kim SC. The identification of candidate effective combination regimens for pancreatic cancer using the histoculture drug response assay. Sci Rep 2020; 10:12004. [PMID: 32686712 PMCID: PMC7371642 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68703-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancer is extremely poor, as they are resistant to first line chemotherapy. The long-term goal of this study was to identify effective combination chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer using pancreatic cancer surgical specimens in the histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) based on three-dimensional culture of tumour fragments, which maintains nature tumour histology in vitro. From 2015 to 2017, the HDRA was performed with tumour specimens from 52 pancreatic cancer patients from Asan Medical Hospital. First, combination drug regimens showed higher drug efficacy and less patient variation than single drugs. Initially, 5-Fluorouracil(5-FU)/Belotecan/Oxaliplatinum and Tegafur/Gimeracil (TS-1)/Oxaliplatinum/Irinotecan were found to be effective. Second, we were able to correlate the efficacy of some drugs with tumour stage. Third, when designing new combination regimens containing 5-FU or gemcitabine, we could identify more effective drug combinations. This is the first study to demonstrate usefulness of the HDRA for pancreatic cancer. Using this technique, we could identify novel candidate combination drug regimens that should be effective in treating pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunsung Jun
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, AMIST, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2 Dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.,Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Yejong Park
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, AMIST, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2 Dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Woohyung Lee
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, AMIST, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2 Dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Jaewoo Kwon
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, AMIST, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2 Dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Song Lee
- Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Moon Bo Kim
- MetaBio, Inc., Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05327, Korea
| | - Ji Sun Lee
- MetaBio, Inc., Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05327, Korea
| | - Ki Byung Song
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, AMIST, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2 Dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Dae Wook Hwang
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, AMIST, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2 Dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, AMIST, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2 Dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Robert M Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego 92103-8220, CA, 92111, USA. .,AntiCancer, Inc., 7917 Ostrow Street, San Diego, CA, 92111, USA.
| | - Song Cheol Kim
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, AMIST, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2 Dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Powley IR, Patel M, Miles G, Pringle H, Howells L, Thomas A, Kettleborough C, Bryans J, Hammonds T, MacFarlane M, Pritchard C. Patient-derived explants (PDEs) as a powerful preclinical platform for anti-cancer drug and biomarker discovery. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:735-744. [PMID: 31894140 PMCID: PMC7078311 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0672-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Preclinical models that can accurately predict outcomes in the clinic are much sought after in the field of cancer drug discovery and development. Existing models such as organoids and patient-derived xenografts have many advantages, but they suffer from the drawback of not contextually preserving human tumour architecture. This is a particular problem for the preclinical testing of immunotherapies, as these agents require an intact tumour human-specific microenvironment for them to be effective. In this review, we explore the potential of patient-derived explants (PDEs) for fulfilling this need. PDEs involve the ex vivo culture of fragments of freshly resected human tumours that retain the histological features of original tumours. PDE methodology for anti-cancer drug testing has been in existence for many years, but the platform has not been widely adopted in translational research facilities, despite strong evidence for its clinical predictivity. By modifying PDE endpoint analysis to include the spatial profiling of key biomarkers by using multispectral imaging, we argue that PDEs offer many advantages, including the ability to correlate drug responses with tumour pathology, tumour heterogeneity and changes in the tumour microenvironment. As such, PDEs are a powerful model of choice for cancer drug and biomarker discovery programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian R Powley
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK.
| | - Meeta Patel
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Gareth Miles
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Howard Pringle
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Lynne Howells
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Anne Thomas
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | | | - Justin Bryans
- LifeArc, Accelerator Building, Open Innovation Campus, Stevenage, SG1 2FX, UK
| | - Tim Hammonds
- Cancer Research UK, Therapeutics Discovery Laboratories, London Bioscience Innovation Centre, 2 Royal College Street, London, NW1 0NH, UK
| | - Marion MacFarlane
- MRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
| | - Catrin Pritchard
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|