Dissecting the expression landscape of mitochondrial genes in lung squamous cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma

Mitochondria transcription and cancer

Mitochondria are major organelles involved in several processes related to energy supply, metabolism, and cell proliferation. The mitochondria function is transcriptionally regulated by mitochondria DNA (mtDNA), which encodes the key proteins in the electron transport chain that is indispensable for oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Mitochondrial transcriptional abnormalities are closely related to a variety of human diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes. The mitochondria transcription is regulated by the mtDNA, mitochondrial RNA polymerase (POLRMT), two transcription factors (TFAM and TF2BM), one transcription elongation (TEFM), and one known transcription termination factor (mTERFs). Dysregulation of these factors directly leads to altered expression of mtDNA in tumor cells, resulting in cellular metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial dysfunction. This dysregulation plays a role in modulating tumor progression. Therefore, understanding the role of mitochondrial transcription in cancer can have implications for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Targeting mitochondrial transcription or related pathways may provide potential therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment. Additionally, assessing mitochondrial transcriptional profiles or biomarkers in cancer cells or patient samples may offer diagnostic or prognostic information.

Functional Role of Mitochondrial DNA in Cancer Progression

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been identified as a significant genetic biomarker in disease, cancer and evolution. Mitochondria function as modulators for regulating cellular metabolism. In the clinic, mtDNA variations (mutations/single nucleotide polymorphisms) and dysregulation of mitochondria-encoded genes are associated with survival outcomes among cancer patients. On the other hand, nuclear-encoded genes have been found to regulate mitochondria-encoded gene expression, in turn regulating mitochondrial homeostasis. These observations suggest that the crosstalk between the nuclear genome and mitochondrial genome is important for cellular function. Therefore, this review summarizes the significant mechanisms and functional roles of mtDNA variations (DNA level) and mtDNA-encoded genes (RNA and protein levels) in cancers and discusses new mechanisms of crosstalk between mtDNA and the nuclear genome.

LINC00628 is differentially expressed between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and is associated with the prognosis of NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the most frequent malignancy worldwide, and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) represent two major subtypes. LINC00628 has been demonstrated to promote LUAD progression; however, its clinical role in NSCLC remains elusive. The aim of the present study was to analyze the expression of long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 628 (LINC00628) in NSCLC, including in the LUAD and LUSC subtypes. In addition, its roles in NSCLC development and prognosis were also examined. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were first used to assess the expression and prognostic potential in both LUAD and LUSC, then LINC00628 expression in 128 NSCLC tissues was measured using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the ability of LINC00628 to discriminate between patients with LUAD and LUSC. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze the relationship between LINC00628 expression and the overall survival of patients. Cox regression analysis was used to explore the potential prognostic factors that might be independently associated with NSCLC overall survival. Both in silico and tissue analysis data indicated that the expression of LINC00628 was significantly upregulated in NSCLC tissue compared with matched normal controls (P<0.001). LINC00628 expression levels were also significantly higher in LUAD cases than in patients with LUSC (P<0.001). In addition, LINC00628 could discriminate LUAD from LUSC cases. The expression of LINC00628 was significantly associated with tumor size (P=0.013), histological type (P=0.009), lymph node metastasis (P=0.021) and TNM stage (P=0.008). Survival analysis based on data from both TCGA and patients included in the present study identified an association between LINC00628 and overall survival in LUAD, but this relationship was not observed in LUSC for TCGA data. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that high LINC00628 expression was associated with poor overall survival in patients with LUAD (P=0.001), but not in patients with LUSC (P=0.088). In conclusion, LINC00628 expression was upregulated in NSCLC and associated with patient prognosis. Patients with LUAD had higher LINC00628 expression levels than those with LUSC, and increased LINC00628 served as an independent prognostic factor in LUAD, but not LUSC.

Mitochondrial DNA variation and cancer

Variation in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence is common in certain tumours. Two classes of cancer mtDNA variants can be identified: de novo mutations that act as 'inducers' of carcinogenesis and functional variants that act as 'adaptors', permitting cancer cells to thrive in different environments. These mtDNA variants have three origins: inherited variants, which run in families, somatic mutations arising within each cell or individual, and variants that are also associated with ancient mtDNA lineages (haplogroups) and are thought to permit adaptation to changing tissue or geographic environments. In addition to mtDNA sequence variation, mtDNA copy number and perhaps transfer of mtDNA sequences into the nucleus can contribute to certain cancers. Strong functional relevance of mtDNA variation has been demonstrated in oncocytoma and prostate cancer, while mtDNA variation has been reported in multiple other cancer types. Alterations in nuclear DNA-encoded mitochondrial genes have confirmed the importance of mitochondrial metabolism in cancer, affecting mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production, redox state and mitochondrial intermediates that act as substrates for chromatin-modifying enzymes. Hence, subtle changes in the mitochondrial genotype can have profound effects on the nucleus, as well as carcinogenesis and cancer progression.

Postoperative radiotherapy for patients with completely resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a preferential benefit for squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on completely resected pathological IIIA-N2 (pIIIA-N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been a subject of interest with controversy. The aim of the study was to distinguish the clinical efficacy of PORT on lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) among pIIIA-N2 NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 2010 and September 2016, 288 consecutive patients with completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC at Beijing Chest Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, which consisted of 194 cases of LADC and 85 cases of LSCC. There were 42 (21.6%) patients treated with PORT in LADC cases and 19 (22.3%) patients treated with PORT in LSCC cases. The 5-year overall survival (OS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic factors were determined using Cox's regression model.

RESULTS

Among 194 cases of LADC, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in the PORT group were 95.2%, 61.9% and 40.0%, respectively, while in the non-PORT group were 90.1%, 63.3% and 45.0% (p = 0.948). The use of postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) and smoking index ≥ 400 were both prognostic factors of 5-year rates of OS, LRFS and DMFS. On the other hand, among 85 cases of LSCC, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in the PORT group were 94.7%, 63.2% and 63.2%, respectively, whereas in the non-PORT group were 86.4%, 48.5% and 37.1% (p = 0.026). In this group, only the use of PORT was a favorable prognostic factor for 5-year OS, LRFS and DMFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to clinicopathological differences among completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC, PORT may not be suitable to all patients. Our study distinguishes pIIIA-N2 LSCC from LADC by their positive responses to PORT.