Changes in blood glucose of elderly patients with gastric cancer combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus after radical operation and the effect of mediation adjustment for blood glucose on the recovery of gastric cancer

Is recovery enhancement after gastric cancer surgery really a safe approach for elderly patients?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in elderly patients with gastric cancer (GC).

AIM

To evaluate the safety of ERAS in elderly patients with GC.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were used to search for eligible studies from inception to April 1, 2023. The mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were pooled for analysis. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale scores. We used Stata (V.16.0) software for data analysis.

RESULTS

This study consists of six studies involving 878 elderly patients. By analyzing the clinical outcomes, we found that the ERAS group had shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD = -0.51, I2 = 0.00%, 95%CI = -0.72 to -0.30, P = 0.00); earlier times to first flatus (defecation; MD = -0.30, I² = 0.00%, 95%CI = -0.55 to -0.06, P = 0.02); less intestinal obstruction (OR = 3.24, I2 = 0.00%, 95%CI = 1.07 to 9.78, P = 0.04); less nausea and vomiting (OR = 4.07, I2 = 0.00%, 95%CI = 1.29 to 12.84, P = 0.02); and less gastric retention (OR = 5.69, I2 = 2.46%, 95%CI = 2.00 to 16.20, P = 0.00). Our results showed that the conventional group had a greater mortality rate than the ERAS group (OR = 0.24, I2 = 0.00%, 95%CI = 0.07 to 0.84, P = 0.03). However, there was no statistically significant difference in major complications between the ERAS group and the conventional group (OR = 0.67, I2 = 0.00%, 95%CI = 0.38 to 1.18, P = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

Compared to those with conventional recovery, elderly GC patients who received the ERAS protocol after surgery had a lower risk of mortality.

Systemic Evaluation of the Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Breast Cancer in a Mouse Model

Breast cancer complicated with diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common disease. To evaluate the effect of preexisting DM on breast cancer progression without drug interference, we used a streptozotocin (STZ)-induced type 2 diabetes mellitus BALB/c mouse model. We found that 4T1 breast cancer complicated with DM decreased the mouse survival time compared with 4T1-bearing mice. The diversity of gut microbiome was affected by DM. The infiltration of mucosal-associated invariant T cell (MAIT), CD8+ T cell, and CD4+ T cell in the tumor was significantly decreased in the DM-4T1 group compared with the 4T1 group. The transcriptome data of tumor tissues indicated that the expressions of inflammatory C–C chemokine- and metabolism-related genes were greatly changed. The abnormal expression of these genes may be related with the decreased T-cell infiltration in DM-4T1. In conclusion, the gut microbiome and tumor microenvironment of diabetic breast cancer patients have unique features. The effect of diabetes on breast cancer should be considered in the treatment for diabetic breast cancer patients.

Survival Risk Analysis of Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Pre-Existing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and survival risk factors in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with preexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus (preDM).

Patients and Methods

All patients with SCLC admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and August 2018 were followed up until August 2020 and retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics of SCLC patients with and without preDM were extracted. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to identify potential independent prognostic factors.

Results

Of 628 eligible individuals, 88 individuals had preDM. preDM was independently significantly associated with distant metastasis in all SCLC patients (p =0.016, OR=1.80, 95% CI 1.11–2.91), while preDM did not affect the outcome of SCLC patients (p=0.803, HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.79–1.36) by multivariate analysis. In the preDM group, the median overall survival (OS) was shorter in the insulin group than in the non insulin group (13.93 months versus 21.77 months, p=0.024). Multivariate analysis identified that insulin treatment was an independent unfavorable factor associated with OS (p =0.009, HR=2.10, 95% CI 1.19–3.64). In addition, poorer performance status (PS) and liver metastasis were also independent unfavorable prognostic factors (all p<0.01), while thoracic therapy significantly improved OS and decreased mortality risk in diabetic patients with SCLC (p<0.05).

Conclusion

preDM may promote distant metastasis of SCLC while it is insulin therapy and not preDM which adversely affects the prognosis of SCLC patients. These findings indicate that enhancing blood glucose control and reducing insulin analog use may be essential to the improvement of the long-term survival of the diabetic population with SCLC.

[Research Advance in Anti-lung Cancer Mechanism of Metformin]

二甲双胍作为治疗2型糖尿病的一线用药，安全性及有效性得到证实。近年来流行病学研究发现二甲双胍具有抑制肺癌细胞增殖及转移等特性，有望成为一种新的抗肺癌药物。肺癌是一种严重危害人类健康的疾病，其发病率和死亡率一直居所有恶性肿瘤之首，且预后差。近年来大量证据表明二甲双胍能降低肺癌等肿瘤的发病风险及死亡率，其机制主要包括激活单磷酸腺苷活化的蛋白激酶通路、改善高胰岛素血症及胰岛素抵抗、促进肺癌细胞凋亡、抑制相关炎症反应等。本文就二甲双胍对肺癌的研究做一综述。

Long-term survival analysis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer complicated with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background

This study aimed to investigate the effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on survival of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed NSCLC patients who had undergone radical lung cancer surgery from January 2011 to December 2014 in the Anhui Medical University affiliated Anhui Provincial Hospital. Kaplan‐Meier plots, log‐rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to describe the effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on the overall survival of patients with NSCLC.

Results

A total of 769 patients with NSCLC were enrolled, including 126 in the diabetic mellitus group and 643 in the nondiabetic mellitus group. The one, three, and five‐year survival for patients with and without diabetes mellitus were 86.1% versus 89.6%, 49.5% versus 62.4%, and 33.3% versus 40.6%, respectively. The Cox model showed that type 2 diabetes mellitus was a poor independent prognostic factors for NSCLC patients. In addition, metformin is a good independent prognostic factor for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions

NSCLC patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus have an increased survival rate compared with those with type 2 diabetes mellitus.