1
|
Jamjoum G, Araji T, Nguyen D, Meguerditchian AN. Predictors of complication after groin dissection: a single-centre experience. Can J Surg 2024; 67:E198-E205. [PMID: 38692683 PMCID: PMC11068424 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.012022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) has historically been associated with substantial morbidity. The objective of this study was to obtain contemporary ILND morbidity rates and to identify potentially preventable risk factors. METHODS We carried out a retrospective review of medical records for all superficial, deep, and combination groin dissections performed at a single, high-volume academic centre between January 2007 and December 2020. We collected data points for patient, disease, and surgery characteristics, and cancer outcomes. The outcome of interest was any complication within 30 days of surgery. Complications included wound infection, wound necrosis or disruption, seroma, drainage procedure, hematoma, and lymphedema. We performed multivariate logistic regression using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS We identified 139 patients having undergone 89 superficial, 12 deep, and 38 combined dissection types, respectively. Melanoma accounted for 84.9% of cases. Of these patients, 56.1% had an adverse postoperative event within 30 days. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07, p < 0.01) and number of positive lymph nodes harvested (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.50, p = 0.05) were associated with more complications. Patients with deep dissection showed a lower likelihood of complications than those with superficial dissection (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.84, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Complication rates after ILND remain high. We identified a number of risk factors, providing opportunities for better selection and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghader Jamjoum
- From Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology (Jamjoum) McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Jamjoum); Department of Surgery (Jamjoum), King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Araji), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; McGill University Health Centre Research Institute (Nguyen, Meguerditchian), Montréal, Que.; Department of Surgery (Meguerditchian), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; St. Mary's Research Centre (Meguerditchian), Montréal, Que
| | - Thea Araji
- From Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology (Jamjoum) McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Jamjoum); Department of Surgery (Jamjoum), King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Araji), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; McGill University Health Centre Research Institute (Nguyen, Meguerditchian), Montréal, Que.; Department of Surgery (Meguerditchian), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; St. Mary's Research Centre (Meguerditchian), Montréal, Que
| | - Diana Nguyen
- From Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology (Jamjoum) McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Jamjoum); Department of Surgery (Jamjoum), King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Araji), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; McGill University Health Centre Research Institute (Nguyen, Meguerditchian), Montréal, Que.; Department of Surgery (Meguerditchian), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; St. Mary's Research Centre (Meguerditchian), Montréal, Que
| | - Ari N Meguerditchian
- From Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology (Jamjoum) McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Jamjoum); Department of Surgery (Jamjoum), King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Araji), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; McGill University Health Centre Research Institute (Nguyen, Meguerditchian), Montréal, Que.; Department of Surgery (Meguerditchian), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; St. Mary's Research Centre (Meguerditchian), Montréal, Que.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pierazzi DM, Pica Alfieri E, Cuomo R, Bocchiotti MA, Grimaldi L, Donniacuo A, Zerini I, Nisi G. Ligasure™ Impact and Ligasure™ Small Jaw in Body Contouring after Massive Weight Loss: A New Perspective. J INVEST SURG 2021; 35:659-666. [PMID: 33691572 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1897714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most effective dissection technique for elevating flaps in body contouring is still controversial, particularly in high-risk massive weight loss (MWL) patients. LigaSure (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) is an energy device commonly used among different surgical specialties to reduce morbidity and improve outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of LigaSure Impact and LigaSure Small Jaw in body contouring after MWL compared with conventional technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who underwent abdominoplasty, mastopexy, brachioplasty and thigh lift after MWL at a single center from 1 December 2018 to 1 March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. In each procedure patients were divided into two groups according to the dissection technique: LigaSure group and monopolar electrosurgery group. Patients characteristics, perioperative details and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS Fourty-five patients underwent abdominoplasty, twenty-six mastopexy, twenty brachioplasty and sixteen medial thigh lift. Using LigaSure, operative time was longer in abdominoplasty and thigh lift, but shorter in mastopexy and brachioplasty. Although not statistically significant, the amount of blood and serum recorded from drains in the first 36 hours was reduced in LigaSure groups. Additional analgesic intake was reduced with LigaSure as well as postoperative subjective pain. In all body contouring procedures statistically significant difference was found in days of hospital stay favoring LigaSure groups. Complications occurred most frequently in control groups compared to LigaSure groups. CONCLUSION LigaSure Impact and LigaSure Small Jaw may be beneficial in improving outcomes because they might reduce fluids drainage, analgesics intake, hospital stay and postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta Maria Pierazzi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, "Santa Maria alle Scotte" Hospital, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Edoardo Pica Alfieri
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, "Santa Maria alle Scotte" Hospital, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Roberto Cuomo
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, "Santa Maria alle Scotte" Hospital, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Maria Alessandra Bocchiotti
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Department of Surgery, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Molinette Ospital Unit, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Grimaldi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, "Santa Maria alle Scotte" Hospital, University of Siena, Italy
| | | | - Irene Zerini
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, "Santa Maria alle Scotte" Hospital, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Nisi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, "Santa Maria alle Scotte" Hospital, University of Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Susano MJ, Grasfield RH, Friese M, Rosner B, Crosby G, Bader AM, Kang JD, Smith TR, Lu Y, Groff MW, Chi JH, Grodstein F, Culley DJ. Brief Preoperative Screening for Frailty and Cognitive Impairment Predicts Delirium after Spine Surgery. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:1184-1191. [PMID: 32898243 PMCID: PMC7657972 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty and cognitive impairment are associated with postoperative delirium, but are rarely assessed preoperatively. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that preoperative screening for frailty or cognitive impairment identifies patients at risk for postoperative delirium (primary outcome). METHODS In this prospective cohort study, the authors administered frailty and cognitive screening instruments to 229 patients greater than or equal to 70 yr old presenting for elective spine surgery. Screening for frailty (five-item FRAIL scale [measuring fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and weight loss]) and cognition (Mini-Cog, Animal Verbal Fluency) were performed at the time of the preoperative evaluation. Demographic data, perioperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were gathered. Delirium was the primary outcome detected by either the Confusion Assessment Method, assessed daily from postoperative day 1 to 3 or until discharge, if patient was discharged sooner, or comprehensive chart review. Secondary outcomes were all other-cause complications, discharge not to home, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS The cohort was 75 [73 to 79 yr] years of age, 124 of 219 (57%) were male. Many scored positive for prefrailty (117 of 218; 54%), frailty (53 of 218; 24%), and cognitive impairment (50 to 82 of 219; 23 to 37%). Fifty-five patients (25%) developed delirium postoperatively. On multivariable analysis, frailty (scores 3 to 5 [odds ratio, 6.6; 95% CI, 1.96 to 21.9; P = 0.002]) versus robust (score 0) on the FRAIL scale, lower animal fluency scores (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.51; P = 0.036) for each point decrease in the number of animals named, and more invasive surgical procedures (odds ratio, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.31 to 5.50; P = 0.007) versus less invasive procedures were associated with postoperative delirium. CONCLUSIONS Screening for frailty and cognitive impairment preoperatively using the FRAIL scale and the Animal Verbal Fluency test in older elective spine surgery patients identifies those at high risk for the development of postoperative delirium. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J. Susano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA.; Champalimaud Research and Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rachel H. Grasfield
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew Friese
- Translational Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA
| | - Bernard Rosner
- Bio-Statistician, Harvard Medical School; Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Gregory Crosby
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Angela M. Bader
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - James D. Kang
- Harvard Medical School; Chairman, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Timothy R. Smith
- Harvard Medical School; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Yi Lu
- Harvard Medical School; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Michael W. Groff
- Harvard Medical School; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - John H. Chi
- Harvard Medical School; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Deborah J. Culley
- Harvard Medical School; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Middle-retroauricular Island Flap: A New Axial Flap for Reconstruction of Non-helical Ear Defects. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e3207. [PMID: 33299688 PMCID: PMC7722565 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Background: Surgical treatment of ear carcinomas needs the selection of the appropriate reconstructive techniques, which depends on the location and the dimensions of the defect after excision of the cancer and the quality of blood supply to the peri-lesional skin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and reliability of a new axial island retroauricular flap (middle-retroauricular island flap M-RIF) for coverage of non-helical ear defects with direct donor site closure. Methods: All patients, from January 2013 to January 2020, with skin tumors of the non-helix region and undergoing a combined skin-cartilage excision with M-RIF local flap reconstruction under local anesthesia, were enrolled in the study. Results: 18 patients (14 men and 4 women) underwent auricle skin-cartilage excision and M-RIF flap reconstruction. The mean age was 65 years (range, 60–85); the type of primary lesions were 12 BCC and 6 SCC. One flap wound dehiscence and one donor site infection and partial necrosis of the posterior auricular skin occurred; no other complications were recorded. Conclusions: The M-RIF flap is a valid surgical option when dealing with non-helical defects of the anterior pinna. It allows the reconstruction of the defect of the entire anterior surface of the auricle apart from the helix and the lobe and primary donor site closure.
Collapse
|