Helical and kinase domain mutations of PIK3CA, and their association with hormone receptor expression in breast cancer

PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer with low HER2 / neu expression

Introduction. Disturbances in the PI3K-dependent (PI3K – phosphoinositide 3‑kinase) cascade are characteristic of all types of breast cancer. In particular, 30–40 % of patients with advanced / metastatic hormone-positive HER2‑negative (HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) breast cancer carry PIK3CA mutations in tumor cells. The detection of these mutations in patients with hormone-positive HER2‑negative breast cancer is of great clinical importance, since they are a predictor of tumor sensitivity to the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib. According to the HER2 / neu protein expression status, all patients with hormone-positive HER2‑negative breast cancer can be divided into two groups – with low expression of HER2 / neu (scores 0, 1+ or 2+ per immunohistochemical analysis and negative result of in situ hybridization) and with a complete lack of expression of this protein.Aim. To establish whether there are differences in the nature and prevalence of PIK3CA mutations in patients in these two groups.Materials and methods. The study was carried out on 32 breast cancer samples with a luminal HER2‑negative immunophenotype, which were divided into two groups – with low HER2 / neu expression (n = 15) and with a complete absence of HER2 / neu expression (n = 17). PIK3CA mutations were determined using the commercially available cobas PIK3CA MutationTest kit (Roche, Switzerland) by real-time polymerase chain reaction on paraffin block material (tissue biopsy).Results. Mutations of the PIK3CA gene were detected in 37.5 % of cases, of which p.E542K mutation was detected in 2 cases; p.E545X – in 3, p.H1047X – in 6 and p.N345K – in 1. Analysis of the mutational status of both groups revealed statistically significant differences in the quantitative distribution of PIK3CA mutations. The frequency of PIK3CA mutations was significantly higher in tumors with low expression of HER2 / neu (p = 0.0268). Thus, characteristic genetic changes have been identified for a group of patients with HER2‑low breast cancer. These changes are potential targets for therapy, which is important for clinical practice, as it opens up new therapeutic possibilities for breast cancer patients with low HER2 / neu expression.

A New View of Activating Mutations in Cancer

A vast effort has been invested in the identification of driver mutations of cancer. However, recent studies and observations call into question whether the activating mutations or the signal strength are the major determinant of tumor development. The data argue that signal strength determines cell fate, not the mutation that initiated it. In addition to activating mutations, factors that can impact signaling strength include (i) homeostatic mechanisms that can block or enhance the signal, (ii) the types and locations of additional mutations, and (iii) the expression levels of specific isoforms of genes and regulators of proteins in the pathway. Because signal levels are largely decided by chromatin structure, they vary across cell types, states, and time windows. A strong activating mutation can be restricted by low expression, whereas a weaker mutation can be strengthened by high expression. Strong signals can be associated with cell proliferation, but too strong a signal may result in oncogene-induced senescence. Beyond cancer, moderate signal strength in embryonic neural cells may be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, and moderate signals in aging may be associated with neurodegenerative diseases, like Alzheimer's disease. The challenge for improving patient outcomes therefore lies in determining signaling thresholds and predicting signal strength.

Neoadjuvant Therapy of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Combined with Endocrine Therapy in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have been advocated for adjuvant therapy of metastatic hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- breast cancer (BC). However, the efficiency of adding CDK 4/6 inhibitors to neoadjuvant therapy was not unequivocal.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency and toxicity of neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors + endocrine therapy (ET) versus neoadjuvant endocrine monotherapy or standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HR+/HER2- BC.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase online databases for randomized controlled trials and single-arm studies written in English until April 2021.

RESULTS

Five studies comparing CDK 4/6 inhibitors + ET as neoadjuvant treatments to ET alone and 2 studies comparing neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors + ET to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analysed. Neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors + ET improved the rate of complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA: central Ki67 < 2.7%, odds ratio [OR] = 7.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.81-13.03, p < 0.001), increased the risk of adverse events (AEs; especially ≥3 AEs; AEs of all grades: OR = 9.10, 95% CI = 2.39-34.58, p = 0.001; AEs ≥3: OR = 12.24, 95% CI = 4.17-35.88, p < 0.001), led to no significant differences in pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with BC (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.04-2.85, p = 0.318) compared to endocrine monotherapy. Moreover, subgroup analysis showed that the 3 types of CDK 4/6 inhibitors all improved the rate of CCCA (ribociclib: OR = 10.31, 95% CI = 3.59-29.61, p < 0.001; palbociclib: OR = 7.39, 95% CI = 1.26-43.40, p = 0.027, and abemaciclib: OR = 8.28, 95% CI = 3.41-20.11, p < 0.001). Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET decreased the risk of AEs ≥3 (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.29-0.87, p = 0.015) and showed similar ability to reach pCR (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.12-2.07, p = 0.342) and reduce the residual cancer burden (RCB, RCB 0-1: OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.18-1.22, p = 0.121; RCB 2-3: OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 0.89-5.91, p = 0.084).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that combination therapy had increased efficacy and toxicity compared to endocrine monotherapy and showed similar efficacy to and better safety than neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The Spectrum, Tendency and Predictive Value of PIK3CA Mutation in Chinese Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background

PIK3CA is a high-frequency mutation gene in colorectal cancer, while its prognostic value remains unclear. This study evaluated the mutation tendency, spectrum, prognosis power and predictive power in cetuximab treatment of PIK3CA in Chinese CRC cohort.

Methods

The PIK3CA exon 9 and 20 status of 5763 CRC patients was detected with Sanger sequencing and a high-resolution melting test. Clinicopathological characteristics of 5733 patients were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method and nomogram were used to evaluate the overall survival curve and disease recurrence, respectively.

Results

Fifty-eight types of mutations in 13.4% (771/5733) of the patients were detected. From 2014 to 2018, the mutation rate of PIK3CA increased from 11.0% to 13.5%. At stage IV, exon 20 mutated patients suffered shorter overall survival time than wild-type patients (multivariate COX regression analysis, HR = 2.72, 95% CIs = 1.47-5.09; p-value = 0.012). At stage III, PIK3CA mutated patients were more likely to relapse (multivariate Logistic regression analysis, exon 9: OR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.34-4.73, p = 0.003; exon 20: OR = 3.89, 95% CI = 1.66-9.10, p = 0.002). The concordance index of the nomogram for predicting the recurrence risk of stage III patients was 0.685. After cetuximab treatment, the median PFS of PIK3CA exon 9 wild-type patients (n = 9) and mutant patients (n = 5) did not reach a significant difference (3.6 months vs. 2.3 months, Log-rank test, p-value = 0.513).

Conclusions

We found that PIK3CA mutation was an adverse predictive marker for the overall survival of stage IV patients and recurrence of stage III patients, respectively. Further more, we suggested that PIK3CA exon 9 mutations are not negative predictors of cetuximab treatment in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients.