Diagnostic value of apolipoprotein C-I, transthyretin and apolipoprotein C-III in gastric cancer

Apolipoproteins: New players in cancers

Apolipoproteins (APOs), the primary protein moiety of lipoproteins, are known for their crucial role in lipid traffic and metabolism. Despite extensive exploration of APOs in cardiovascular diseases, their roles in cancers did not attract enough attention. Recently, research focusing on the roles of APOs in cancers has flourished. Multiple studies demonstrate the interaction of APOs with classical pathways of tumorigenesis. Besides, the dysregulation of APOs may indicate cancer occurrence and progression, thus serving as potential biomarkers for cancer patients. Herein, we summarize the mechanisms of APOs involved in the development of various cancers, their applications as cancer biomarkers and their genetic polymorphism associated with cancer risk. Additionally, we also discuss the potential anti-cancer therapies by virtue of APOs. The comprehensive review of APOs in cancers may advance the understanding of the roles of APOs in cancers and their potential mechanisms. We hope that it will provide novel clues and new therapeutic strategies for cancers.

Feasibility of ApoC1 serum levels as tumor biomarker in glioblastoma patients: a pilot study

Apolipoprotein C1 (ApoC1) has been detected immunohistochemically in glioblastoma tissue, probably expressed by activated monocytes and microglia. The present study was conceived to determine whether the amount of intratumoral ApoC1 expression leads to measurable changes of serum levels after glioblastoma resection or during recurrence. 176 blood samples from 70 glioblastoma patients were collected perioperatively and during subsequent therapy. ApoC1 serum levels were determined using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). High absorption values due to lipemic or hemolytic serum were removed from the final dataset using a stem and leaf plot. Samples were grouped according to the treatment stage to compare mean ApoC1 serum levels. The number of patients with falling or increasing perioperative values was assessed. 167 ApoC1 serum values from 68 glioblastoma patients were amenable to statistical evaluation. Mean ApoC1 serum level was 91.9 µg/ml (n = 167, sd = 36.0). In samples from patients undergoing first glioblastoma resection, the mean preoperative value was significantly higher (94.8 µg/ml, n = 37, sd = 29.5) than after surgery (77.4 µg/ml, n = 41, sd = 23.2, p = 0.009). Individually, falling ApoC1 levels were detected in 25 and rising levels in 9 patients (p = 0.0061). Single absolute serum levels of ApoC1 do not allow an estimation of glioblastoma activity or tumor response. Although pathophysiologically of interest, ApoC1 serum levels did not qualify as a potential biomarker in glioblastoma management. Our results do not seem to encourage larger, multicenter studies.

Construction of 2DE Patterns of Plasma Proteins: Aspect of Potential Tumor Markers

The use of tumor markers aids in the early detection of cancer recurrence and prognosis. There is a hope that they might also be useful in screening tests for the early detection of cancer. Here, the question of finding ideal tumor markers, which should be sensitive, specific, and reliable, is an acute issue. Human plasma is one of the most popular samples as it is commonly collected in the clinic and provides noninvasive, rapid analysis for any type of disease including cancer. Many efforts have been applied in searching for “ideal” tumor markers, digging very deep into plasma proteomes. The situation in this area can be improved in two ways—by attempting to find an ideal single tumor marker or by generating panels of different markers. In both cases, proteomics certainly plays a major role. There is a line of evidence that the most abundant, so-called “classical plasma proteins”, may be used to generate a tumor biomarker profile. To be comprehensive these profiles should have information not only about protein levels but also proteoform distribution for each protein. Initially, the profile of these proteins in norm should be generated. In our work, we collected bibliographic information about the connection of cancers with levels of “classical plasma proteins”. Additionally, we presented the proteoform profiles (2DE patterns) of these proteins in norm generated by two-dimensional electrophoresis with mass spectrometry and immunodetection. As a next step, similar profiles representing protein perturbations in plasma produced in the case of different cancers will be generated. Additionally, based on this information, different test systems can be developed.

Discovery and Evaluation of Protein Biomarkers as a Signature of Wellness in Late-Stage Cancer Patients in Early Phase Clinical Trials

TARGET (tumour characterisation to guide experimental targeted therapy) is a cancer precision medicine programme focused on molecular characterisation of patients entering early phase clinical trials. Performance status (PS) measures a patient's ability to perform a variety of activities. However, the quality of present algorithms to assess PS is limited and based on qualitative clinician assessment. Plasma samples from patients enrolled into TARGET were analysed using the mass spectrometry (MS) technique: sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH)-MS. SWATH-MS was used on a discovery cohort of 55 patients to differentiate patients into either a good or poor prognosis by creation of a Wellness Score (WS) that showed stronger prediction of overall survival (p = 0.000551) compared to PS (p = 0.001). WS was then tested against a validation cohort of 77 patients showing significant (p = 0.000451) prediction of overall survival. WS in both sets had receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.76 (p = 0.002) and 0.67 (p = 0.011): AUC of PS was 0.70 (p = 0.117) and 0.55 (p = 0.548). These signatures can now be evaluated further in larger patient populations to assess their utility in a clinical setting.

Identifying Novel Biomarkers Ready for Evaluation in Low-Prevalence Populations for the Early Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Detecting upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in primary care is challenging, as cancer symptoms are common, often non-specific, and most patients presenting with these symptoms will not have cancer. Substantial investment has been made to develop biomarkers for cancer detection, but few have reached routine clinical practice. We aimed to identify novel biomarkers for upper GI cancers which have been sufficiently validated to be ready for evaluation in low-prevalence populations.

Methods

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, and Web of Science for studies published in English from January 2000 to October 2019 (PROSPERO registration CRD42020165005). Reference lists of included studies were assessed. Studies had to report on second measures of diagnostic performance (beyond discovery phase) for biomarkers (single or in panels) used to detect pancreatic, oesophageal, gastric, and biliary tract cancers. We included all designs and excluded studies with less than 50 cases/controls. Data were extracted on types of biomarkers, populations and outcomes. Heterogeneity prevented pooling of outcomes.

Results

We identified 149 eligible studies, involving 22,264 cancer cases and 49,474 controls. A total of 431 biomarkers were identified (183 microRNAs and other RNAs, 79 autoantibodies and other immunological markers, 119 other proteins, 36 metabolic markers, 6 circulating tumour DNA and 8 other). Over half (n = 231) were reported in pancreatic cancer studies. Only 35 biomarkers had been investigated in at least two studies, with reported outcomes for that individual marker for the same tumour type. Apolipoproteins (apoAII-AT and apoAII-ATQ), and pepsinogens (PGI and PGII) were the most promising biomarkers for pancreatic and gastric cancer, respectively.

Conclusion

Most novel biomarkers for the early detection of upper GI cancers are still at an early stage of matureness. Further evidence is needed on biomarker performance in low-prevalence populations, in addition to implementation and health economic studies, before extensive adoption into clinical practice can be recommended.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01571-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Apolipoprotein: prospective biomarkers in digestive tract cancer

Digestive tract cancer, which is characterized by high morbidity and mortality, seriously affects the quality of life of patients worldwide. The digestive tract has abundant blood supply and nutriment, providing a suitable environment for tumor cells. Under chemical, physical, and biological stimuli, the activated cancer-related genes promote tumorigenesis. The synthesis of apolipoprotein occurs in the liver, intestine, and other digestive organs. However, the functions of apolipoproteins are not limited to lipid metabolism. An increasing number of studies have revealed that apolipoproteins take part in the regulation of tumor behavior. Apolipoprotein A (apoA) has recently been acknowledged as a beneficial indicator of several cancers, including colon, hepatocellular, and pancreatic cancer. Apolipoprotein E (apoE) can affect tumor susceptibility on account of genetic polymorphism. Levels of apolipoprotein C (apoC), B (apoB), and D (apoD) also impact tumor progression and the prognosis of patients. However, because of individual, racial, and genetic differences, a consensus has not yet been reached. Based on clinical data and analysis, apolipoproteins could be a novel target and marker in tumor therapy and prevention.