Challenges surrounding postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for T2N0 gastric cancer

Optimizing the Choice for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer

Simple Summary

Gastric cancer is the fourth largest cause of tumor-related death worldwide. Despite advances in the management of resectable cancer and improvements in early diagnosis, especially in east Asia where screening campaigns are actively performed, many patients experience recurrence and die because of the disease. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy is administered after radical surgery in order to reduce the risk of recurrence and death. The modality of administration and regimens of chemotherapy in this setting are different between Eastern and Western countries. In Asia, adjuvant chemotherapy is traditionally given after surgery, while in Europe it is commonly scheduled after preoperative chemotherapy and surgery (perioperative chemotherapy), and in Northern America it is usually combined with radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy). All these approaches are sustained by well-designed phase III clinical studies, and none may be considered superior to the others in the absence of head-to-head comparisons. The identification of predictive and/or prognostic factors could help to select patients at higher risk of recurrence and those more likely to receive a benefit from the adjuvant treatment. This would allow clinicians to avoid the administration of undue toxicity to non-responder patients and even to reduce the cost of unnecessary treatment.

Abstract

Advances in the management of gastric cancer have improved patient survival in the last decade. Nonetheless, the number of patients relapsing and dying after a diagnosis of localized gastric cancer is still too high, even in early stages (10% in stage I). Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy has been proven to significantly improve outcomes. In the present article we have critically reviewed the clinical trials that guide the current clinical practice in the adjuvant treatment of patients affected by resectable gastric cancer, focusing on the different approaches worldwide, i.e., adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and perioperative chemotherapy. We also delineate the clinical–pathological characteristics that are commonly taken into account to identify patients at a higher risk of recurrence and requiring adjuvant chemotherapy, and also describe novel biomarkers and therapeutic agents that might allow personalization of the treatment.

Prognostic Value of lncRNA PVT1 for Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the prognostic value of lncRNA PVT1 for patients with gastric cancer.

Methods

A comprehensive literature searching was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, CBM, and Wanfang Database to identify published studies on the expression level of lncRNA PVT1 in human gastric cancer. STATA 12.0 was conducted to perform the meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes including patients' age, genders, TNM stage, OS, and DFS were assessed in the study.

Results

A total of 8 studies involving 747 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that higher expression level of lncRNA PVT1 was associated with GC patients' gender (for male: OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.67~3.07, P = 0.000), invasion depth (for T3~4: OR = 3.98, 95% CI: 2.85~5.56, P = 0.000), poorer OS (HR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.43~1.97, P = 0.000), and DFS (HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.44~2.08, P = 0.000).

Conclusion

Higher expression level of lncRNA PVT1 is significantly associated with GC patients' gender, invasion depth, poorer OS, and worse DFS. lncRNA PVT1 might act as a novel predictive biomarker of poor prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics for gastric cancer.

Locally advanced gastroesophageal junction cancer with pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy: a case report and literature review

Most gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GEJ) patients are already in the advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Thus, the probability of radical gastrectomy is low, and surgical treatment alone has a poor prognosis due to the high recurrence rate. In order to reduce the recurrence and distant metastasis after surgery, there have been many attempts made to improve the perioperative treatment of advanced localized gastric cancer, but no uniform criteria exist. Over recent years, immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown excellent efficacy across various types of tumors, becoming a potential treatment after surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. However, the efficacy of single-agent ICIs for gastric cancer is still unsatisfactory. As comprehensive, chemotherapy-based treatment has become the standard care for locally advanced gastric cancer, exploring combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be valuable to improving survival outcomes. Here, we report a 66-year-old male with dysphagia diagnosed with GEJ and was defined as clinical stage (cT4N2M0) and Siewert type II, characterized as mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) negative; surprisingly, with anti-PD-1 antibody plus SOX (S-1: a combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil+ oxaliplatin) as perioperative therapy, the patient achieved pathological complete remission (pCR), which indicates that the addition of ICIs to chemotherapy as a perioperative comprehensive treatment might provide a promising strategy option for GEJ. In addition, we review the current status of perioperative comprehensive treatment, in hope that this may provide some reference value for clinical decision-making.