The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of clinical outcomes of patients with acute leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Analysis of Positive Results of 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to differentiate between false-positive and true-positive positron emission tomography (PET) results after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for lymphoma involvement by analyzing several clinical variables and specific imaging features.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with lymphoma who received SCT and underwent post-transplantation ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans between January 2013 and April 2021 at our institution were included. Associations between PET positivity and related clinical information were assessed using t-tests and χ² tests. The significance of variables differentiating benign lesions from malignant FDG-avid lesions was evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Survival probabilities were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients (235 post-transplantation PET/CT scans) were enrolled in our present study. Compared with those with true-positive PET results, patients with false-positive PET results exhibited a better prognosis. For the autologous SCT group, false-positive cases were more commonly seen when FDG-avid foci appeared outside the sites of the original disease (p = 0.004), and the integrated CT imaging showed negative results (p = 0.000). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, integrated CT results were the only significant factor. For the allogeneic SCT group, false-positive cases were significantly more commonly seen when DS = 4 (p = 0.046), FDG-avid foci appeared outside the sites of the original disease (p = 0.022), and the integrated CT imaging showed negative results (p = 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, whether FDG-avid foci were in the sites of the original disease and integrated CT results were both significant factors.

CONCLUSION

False-positive FDG uptake in post-transplantation PET was not uncommon. Several variables could provide an important reference to differentiate false-positive from true-positive post-SCT PET results for lymphoma involvement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2300067355.

PET/CT Evaluation of the Effect of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography scanning (PET/CT) in the evaluation of the effect of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of T lymphoblastic lymphoma. 12 relevant research articles were collected through layer-by-layer screening in large databases such as Pubmed, Baidu Scholar, and China How Net, and analyzed and summarized using indicators such as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), hazard ratio (HR), maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and β2-microglobulin (β2-MG). The results showed that before treatment, 18F-FDG PET/CT baseline diagnosis could accurately stage the patients; during treatment, 18F-FDG PET/CT detection could provide effective treatment information; and after treatment, complications were found during 18F-FDG PET/CT detection. In summary, 18F-FDG PET/CT can monitor and evaluate treatment prognosis at baseline, middle, and late stages, and 18F-FDG PET/CT has become an indispensable and important examination technique in clinical work.

Minimal Residual Disease Prior to and After Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: What Level of Negativity Is Relevant?

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment plays a central role in risk stratification and treatment guidance in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). As such, MRD prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major factor that is independently correlated with outcome. High burden of MRD is negatively correlated with post-transplant survival, as both the risk of leukaemia recurrence and non-relapse mortality increase with greater levels of MRD. Despite growing evidence supporting these findings, controversies still exist. In particular, it is still not clear whether multiparameter flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, which is used to recognise immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, can be employed interchangeably. Moreover, the higher sensitivity in MRD quantification offered by next-generation sequencing techniques may further refine the ability to stratify transplant-associated risks. While MRD quantification from bone marrow prior to HSCT remains the state of the art, heavily pre-treated patients may benefit from additional staging, such as using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to detect focal residues of disease. Additionally, the timing of MRD detection (i.e., immediately before administration of the conditioning regimen or weeks before) is a matter of debate. Pre-transplant MRD negativity has previously been associated with superior outcomes; however, in the recent For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) study, pre-HSCT MRD positivity was associated with neither relapse risk nor survival. In this review, we discuss the level of MRD that may require pre-transplant therapy intensification, risking time delay and complications (as well as losing the window for HSCT if disease progression occurs), as opposed to an adapted post-transplant strategy to achieve long-term remission. Indeed, MRD monitoring may be a valuable tool to guide individualised treatment decisions, including tapering of immunosuppression, cellular therapies (such as donor lymphocyte infusions) or additional immunotherapy (such as bispecific T-cell engagers or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy).