Breast cancer therapy affects the expression of antineonatal Nav1.5 antibodies in the serum of patients with breast cancer

Ion Transporting Proteins and Cancer: Progress and Perspectives

Ion transporting proteins (ITPs) comprise a wide range of ion channels, exchangers, pumps and ionotropic receptors many of which are expressed in tumours and contribute dynamically to the different components and stages of the complex cancer process, from initiation to metastasis. In this promising major field of biomedical research, several candidate ITPs have emerged as clinically viable. Here, we consider a series of general issues concerning the oncological potential of ITPs focusing on voltage-gated sodium channels as a 'case study'. First, we outline some key properties of 'cancer' as a whole. These include epigenetics, stemness, metastasis, heterogeneity, neuronal characteristics and bioelectricity. Cancer specificity of ITP expression is evaluated in relation to tissue restriction, splice variance, functional specificity and macro-molecular complexing. As regards clinical potential, diagnostics is covered with emphasis on enabling early detection. For therapeutics, we deal with molecular approaches, drug repurposing and combinations. Importantly, we emphasise the need for carefully designed clinical trials. We highlight also the area of 'social responsibility' and the need to involve the public (cancer patients and healthy individuals) in the work of cancer research professionals as well as clinicians. In advising patients how best to manage cancer, and live with it, we offer the following four principles: Awareness and prevention, early detection, specialist, integrated care, and psychological support. Finally, we highlight four key prerequisites for commercialisation of ITP-based technologies against cancer. We conclude that ITPs offer significant potential as regards both understanding the intricacies of the complex process of cancer and for developing much needed novel therapies.

Discovering the Triad between Nav1.5, Breast Cancer, and the Immune System: A Fundamental Review and Future Perspectives

Nav1.5 is one of the nine voltage-gated sodium channel-alpha subunit (VGSC-α) family members. The Nav1.5 channel typically carries an inward sodium ion current that depolarises the membrane potential during the upstroke of the cardiac action potential. The neonatal isoform of Nav1.5, nNav1.5, is produced via VGSC-α alternative splicing. nNav1.5 is known to potentiate breast cancer metastasis. Despite their well-known biological functions, the immunological perspectives of these channels are poorly explored. The current review has attempted to summarise the triad between Nav1.5 (nNav1.5), breast cancer, and the immune system. To date, there is no such review available that encompasses these three components as most reviews focus on the molecular and pharmacological prospects of Nav1.5. This review is divided into three major subsections: (1) the review highlights the roles of Nav1.5 and nNav1.5 in potentiating the progression of breast cancer, (2) focuses on the general connection between breast cancer and the immune system, and finally (3) the review emphasises the involvements of Nav1.5 and nNav1.5 in the functionality of the immune system and the immunogenicity. Compared to the other subsections, section three is pretty unexploited; it would be interesting to study this subsection as it completes the triad.

Neonatal NaV 1.5: Pharmacological distinctiveness of a cancer-related voltage-gated sodium channel splice variant

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Voltage-gated sodium (Na_V ) channels are expressed de novo in carcinomas where their activity promotes invasiveness. Breast and colon cancer cells express the neonatal splice variant of Na_V 1.5 (nNa_V 1.5) which has several amino acid substitutions in the domain I voltage-sensor compared to its adult counterpart (aNa_V 1.5). This study aimed to determine whether nNa_V 1.5 could be distinguished pharmacologically from aNa_V 1.5.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Cells expressing either nNa_V 1.5 or aNa_V 1.5 were exposed to small-molecule inhibitors, an antibody or natural toxins, and changes in electrophysiological parameters were measured. Stable expression in EBNA cells and transient expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes were used. Currents were recorded by whole-cell patch clamp and two-electrode voltage-clamp, respectively.

KEY RESULTS

Several clinically-used blockers of Na_v channels (lidocaine, procaine, phenytoin, mexiletine, ranolazine and riluzole) could not distinguish between nNa_V 1.5 or aNa_V 1.5. On the other hand, two tarantula toxins (HaTx and ProTx-II) and a polyclonal antibody (NESOpAb) preferentially inhibited currents elicited by either nNa_V 1.5 or aNa_V 1.5 by binding to the spliced region of the channel. Furthermore, the amino acid residue at position 211 (aspartate in aNa_V 1.5/lysine in nNa_V 1.5), i.e. the charge reversal in the spliced region of the channel, played a key role in the selectivity especially in the antibody binding.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

We conclude that the cancer-related nNa_V 1.5 channel can be distinguished pharmacologically from its nearest neighbour, aNa_V 1.5. Thus, it may be possible to design small molecules as anti-metastatic drugs for non-toxic therapy of nNa_V 1.5-expressing carcinomas.