Clinical significance of hypertension in patients with different types of cancer treated with antiangiogenic drugs

Severe hypertension development significantly improves progression-free survival in regorafenib treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Regorafenib is the first multikinase inhibitor used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. Reports regarding other multikinase inhibitors have suggested that the development of hypertension is associated with improved clinical benefits. We aimed to reveal the relationship between the development of severe hypertension and regorafenib efficacy in an mCRC real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients with mCRC (n = 100) who received regorafenib were assessed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was a comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and without ≥ grade 3 hypertension. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Patients developing ≥ grade 3 hypertension accounted for 30%, and obtained significantly longer PFS than control patients (median PFS of 53 and 56 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] of 46-144 and 49-63 days, respectively; P = 0.04). In contrast, OS and DCR were not statistically different between the groups (P = 0.13 and P = 0.46, respectively). The incidence and severity of adverse effects were not significantly different, except for hypertension. Treatment interruption was significantly more frequent in patients with hypertension (P = 0.04). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis suggested that the development of ≥ grade 3 severe hypertension was an independent factor for improved PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.93; P = 0.02). In contrast, baseline hypoalbuminemia was associated with a worse PFS (1.85, 1.14-3.01; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We have revealed that patients who develop severe hypertension after regorafenib treatment for mCRC have improved PFS. Management of hypertension is important for effective treatment with less burden; therefore, further evaluation is needed.

Tumor vessel normalization and immunotherapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common malignant tumor, and patients with GC have a low survival rate due to limited effective treatment methods. Angiogenesis and immune evasion are two key processes in GC progression, and they act synergistically to promote tumor progression. Tumor vascular normalization has been shown to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy, which in turn may be improved through enhanced immune stimulation. Therefore, it may be interesting to identify synergies between immunomodulatory agents and anti-angiogenic therapies in GC. This strategy aims to normalize the tumor microenvironment through the action of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor while stimulating the immune response through immunotherapy and prolonging the survival of GC patients.

Three-dimensional vectorcardiographic characteristics of breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer (breast cancer) may develop cardiac electrophysiological abnormalities. The aim of this study is to examined possible alterations in cardiac electrophysiological parameters detected by three-dimensional vectorcardiograms (3D-VCGs) in breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-center cohort study conducted in Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China. Patients with breast cancer referred for chemotherapy from May 1, 2019, to October 1, 2019 were invited to participate in the study. 3D-VCGs and echocardiography were recorded at rest four times (baseline, after the first cycle, after third cycles and at the end of the regimen, respectively).

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were included. Compared with baseline, decreases in 3D maximum T vector magnitude (TVM) (0.29 ± 0.10 vs. 0.25 ± 0.10 mV; p < 0.05) and 3D T/QRS ratio (0.26 ± 0.11 vs. 0.21 ± 0.11; p < 0.05) were observed by the end of chemotherapy regimen, while echocardiographic parameters showed no significant variation before and after chemotherapy (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, after third cycles, maximum TVM were correlated with LVEF except in horizontal plane (3D: r = 0.33, p < 0.01; frontal plane: r = 0.34, p < 0.01; horizontal plane: r = 0.24, p = 0.06; right side plane: r = 0.30, p = 0.02). After completion of chemotherapy, maximum TVM were also positive correlated with LVEF (3D: r = 0.33, P < 0.01; frontal plane: r = 0.32, P = 0.01; horizontal plane: r = 0.27, P = 0.03, right side plane: r = 0.38, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Along with chemotherapy, maximum TVM and T/QRS is lower in patients with breast cancer. After third cycles and after completion of chemotherapy, there is a positive correlation between maximum TVM and LVEF. 3D-VCGs can be used to detect electrophysiological abnormalities in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.