Effect of the circCDR1as/miR-641/XIAP regulatory axis on the proliferation and invasion of the prostate cancer PC-3 cell line

Therapeutic importance and diagnostic function of circRNAs in urological cancers: from metastasis to drug resistance

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a member of non-coding RNAs with no ability in encoding proteins and their aberrant dysregulation is observed in cancers. Their closed-loop structure has increased their stability, and they are reliable biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. Urological cancers have been responsible for high mortality and morbidity worldwide, and developing new strategies in their treatment, especially based on gene therapy, is of importance since these malignant diseases do not respond to conventional therapies. In the current review, three important aims are followed. At the first step, the role of circRNAs in increasing or decreasing the progression of urological cancers is discussed, and the double-edged sword function of them is also highlighted. At the second step, the interaction of circRNAs with molecular targets responsible for urological cancer progression is discussed, and their impact on molecular processes such as apoptosis, autophagy, EMT, and MMPs is highlighted. Finally, the use of circRNAs as biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of urological cancer patients is discussed to translate current findings in the clinic for better treatment of patients. Furthermore, since circRNAs can be transferred to tumor via exosomes and the interactions in tumor microenvironment provided by exosomes such as between macrophages and cancer cells is of importance in cancer progression, a separate section has been devoted to the role of exosomal circRNAs in urological tumors.

circIFITM1/miR-802/Foxp1 Axis Participates in Proliferation and Invasion of Lovo Cells

Objective. To explore the role of circIFITM1 and its potential molecular mechanism in colon cancer. Methods. The circIFITM1 in human samples and cell lines of colon cancer was measured via RT-PCR. The cyclicity of circIFITM1 was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing, and the stability of circIFITM1 was confirmed by actinomycin D assay. The proliferative and invasive ability was detected by the CCK-8 assay and Transwell assay, respectively. RNA pull-down assay confirmed a combination of circIFITM1 and miRNA. Dual-luciferase reporter gene was used to detect the direct relationship between miRNA and the target gene. Results. circIFITM1 originated from the maternal gene IFITM1and had high stability. It was resistant to processing by actinomycin D. Upregulating circIFITM1 facilitated the proliferation and invasion of Lovo cells, while interfering with circIFITM1 expression inhibited them. circIFITM1 interacted with miR-802, and miR-802 targeted the 3 ${}^{\prime }$ UTR of FOXP1. The overexpression of circIFITM1 downregulated miR-802 and upregulated FOXP1. Conclusion. circIFITM1 facilitates the proliferative and invasive abilities via miR-802/FOXP1 in Lovo cells.

Apoptosis as Driver of Therapy-Induced Cancer Repopulation and Acquired Cell-Resistance (CRAC): A Simple In Vitro Model of Phoenix Rising in Prostate Cancer

Apoptotic cells stimulate compensatory proliferation through the caspase-3-cPLA-2-COX-2-PGE-2-STAT3 Phoenix Rising pathway as a healing process in normal tissues. Phoenix Rising is however usurped in cancer, potentially nullifying pro-apoptotic therapies. Cytotoxic therapies also promote cancer cell plasticity through epigenetic reprogramming, leading to epithelial-to-mesenchymal-transition (EMT), chemo-resistance and tumor progression. We explored the relationship between such scenarios, setting-up an innovative, straightforward one-pot in vitro model of therapy-induced prostate cancer repopulation. Cancer (castration-resistant PC3 and androgen-sensitive LNCaP), or normal (RWPE-1) prostate cells, are treated with etoposide and left recovering for 18 days. After a robust apoptotic phase, PC3 setup a coordinate tissue-like response, repopulating and acquiring EMT and chemo-resistance; repopulation occurs via Phoenix Rising, being dependent on high PGE-2 levels achieved through caspase-3-promoted signaling; epigenetic inhibitors interrupt Phoenix Rising after PGE-2, preventing repopulation. Instead, RWPE-1 repopulate via Phoenix Rising without reprogramming, EMT or chemo-resistance, indicating that only cancer cells require reprogramming to complete Phoenix Rising. Intriguingly, LNCaP stop Phoenix-Rising after PGE-2, failing repopulating, suggesting that the propensity to engage/complete Phoenix Rising may influence the outcome of pro-apoptotic therapies. Concluding, we established a reliable system where to study prostate cancer repopulation, showing that epigenetic reprogramming assists Phoenix Rising to promote post-therapy cancer repopulation and acquired cell-resistance (CRAC).

Clinical values of expression signature of circCDR1AS and circHIAT1 in prostate cancer: Two circRNAs with regulatory function in androgen receptor (AR) and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a genetically heterogeneous disease with highly molecular aberrations. It has been revealed that a newly discovered class of non‐coding RNAs called circular RNAs (circRNAs) play key roles in dictating tumor behaviors and phenotypes of the prostate tumors. In the current study, our aim was to determine the expression profiles of circHIAT1 and circCDR1AS in PCa compared with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) tissues, as well as their clinicopathological relevance.

Methods

The 50 prostate tissues including 25 PCa tissues and 25 BPH samples were collected for analyzing the expression levels of target circRNAs by quantitative real‐time PCR (qRT‐PCR).

Results

The results revealed that expression of circCDR1AS was significantly elevated in PCa compared with the BPH (p < 0.05). We also observed that PCa patients over the age of 60 had a higher expression of the circCDR1AS than patients under the age of 60 (p = 0.017). Moreover, a lower expression level of circHIAT1 was found in the PCa than BPH tissues (p < 0.05), and finally, the findings indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) of circCDR1AS was 0.848, with 92% sensitivity and 76% specificity, as well as an AUC of 0.828, with the 80% sensitivity and 76% specificity for circHIAT1.

Conclusion

These observations suggest that the abnormal expression of circCDR1AS and circHIAT1 can be regarded as two different types of molecular pathology with potential biomarker values for PCa, although further studies are needed.

The Emerging Role of Circular RNAs in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors that threaten the health of men. It is urgent to explore new molecular targets and develop new drugs for the treatment of prostate cancer. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are aberrantly expressed in various malignant tumors. The dysregulated circRNAs are involved in the metastasis, tumor growth, drug resistance, and immunosuppression of malignant tumors. The present review systematically summarized publications concerning the biological implications of circRNAs in prostate cancer. The PubMed and Web of Science databases were used to retrieve publications concerning circRNAs and prostate cancer until June 16, 2021. The following keywords were used in the literature search: (circRNA OR circular RNA) AND prostate cancer. 73 publications were enrolled in the present systematic review to summarize the role of circRNAs in prostate cancer. The dysregulated and functional circRNAs were involved in the cell cycle, proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, drug resistance and radiosensitivity of prostate cancer. In addition, circRNAs could function through EVs and serve as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers. Certain circRNAs were correlated with clinicopathological features of prostate cancer. A comprehensive review of the molecular mechanism of the tumorigenesis and progression of prostate cancer may contribute to the development of new therapies of prostate cancer in the future.