1
|
van der Burg SJC, van de Wal D, Roets E, Steeghs N, van Sandick JW, Kerst M, van Coevorden F, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof XAAFA, Koenen AM, Ijzerman N, van der Graaf WTA, Schrage YM, van Houdt WJ. Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Locally Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) is Effective and Safe: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study with 108 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8660-8668. [PMID: 37814179 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14346-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant imatinib is considered for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) when decreased tumor size provides less extensive surgery and higher R0 resection rates. This study evaluates the effectivity and safety of neoadjuvant imatinib for large or locally advanced GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS From the prospective database of the Dutch GIST Consortium, all patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant imatinib at our center between 2009 and 2022 were selected. Independent and blinded assessment of surgical strategy was performed by two surgeons, based on anonymized computed tomography (CT) scans before and after neoadjuvant imatinib. RESULTS Of 113 patients that received neoadjuvant imatinib, 108 (95%) [mean age 61.6, standard deviation (SD) 11.5, 54% male] underwent a GIST resection. Of all GISTs, 67% was localized in the stomach and 25% in the duodenum or small intestine. In 74% of the patients with GIST, a KIT exon 11 mutation was found. Decreased tumor size was seen in 95 (88%) patients. Having a KIT exon 11 mutation [odds ratio (OR) 5.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-19.1, p < 0.01] or not having a mutation (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.89, p = 0.04) were positive and negative predictive values for partial response, respectively. In 55 (51%) patients, there was deescalation of surgical strategy after neoadjuvant imatinib. Surgical complications were documented in 16 (15%) patients (n = 8, grade II; n = 5, grade IIIa; n = 3, grade IIIb) and R0 resection was accomplished in 95 (89%) patients. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival were 80% and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSION This study shows that neoadjuvant imatinib is effective and safe for patients with large or locally advanced GIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn J C van der Burg
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Deborah van de Wal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyne Roets
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Sarcoma Group, Dutch GIST Consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Neeltje Steeghs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Sarcoma Group, Dutch GIST Consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Kerst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frits van Coevorden
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen J Hartemink
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Xander A A F A Veenhof
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Miek Koenen
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikki Ijzerman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Winette T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne M Schrage
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Sarcoma Group, Dutch GIST Consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ding P, Wu J, Wu H, Sun C, Guo H, Lowe S, Yang P, Tian Y, Liu Y, Meng L, Zhao Q. Inflammation and nutritional status indicators as prognostic indicators for patients with locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with neoadjuvant imatinib. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:23. [PMID: 36690935 PMCID: PMC9869595 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02658-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have confirmed that preoperative nutritional-inflammatory indicators can predict prognosis in various malignancies. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated the assessment of systemic inflammatory immunity index (SII) combined with prognostic nutritional index (PNI) scores to predict prognosis after neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib in locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (LA-GIST). The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of pretreatment SII-PNI scores in predicting recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib in patients with LA-GIST. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 57 patients with LA-GIST who received imatinib neoadjuvant from January 2013 to March 2019. Patients were divided into recurrence and non-recurrence groups according to their follow-up status, and SII and PNI cut-offs were calculated by receiver operating characteristic. The SII-PNI score ranged from 0 to 2 and were categorized into the following: score of 2, high SII (≥ 544.6) and low PNI (≤ 47.2); score of 1, either high SII (≥ 544.6) or low PNI (≤ 47.2); score of 0, no high SII (≥ 544.6) nor low PNI (≤ 47.2). RESULTS All patients received imatinib neoadjuvant therapy for a median treatment period of 8.5 months (ranging from 3.2 to 12.6 months), with 8 patients (14.04%) and 49 patients (85.96%) developing recurrence and non-recurrence, respectively. Patients with a high SII-PNI score had a significantly worse recurrence-free survival time than those with a low SII-PNI score (P = 0.022, 0.046), and had a poorer pathological response (P = 0.014). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the SII-PNI score was an independent prognostic factor for prediction of recurrence-free survival (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION The pre-treatment SII-PNI score can be used to predict the efficacy after neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib in patients with LA-GIST, which may be a promising predictor of recurrence-free survival time for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping’an Ding
- grid.452582.cThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011 Hebei China ,Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China
| | - Jiaxiang Wu
- grid.452582.cThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011 Hebei China ,Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China
| | - Haotian Wu
- grid.452582.cThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011 Hebei China ,Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China
| | - Chenyu Sun
- grid.488798.20000 0004 7535 783XAMITA Health Saint Joseph Hospital Chicago, 2900 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60657 USA
| | - Honghai Guo
- grid.452582.cThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011 Hebei China ,Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China
| | - Scott Lowe
- grid.258405.e0000 0004 0539 5056College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City University, 1750 Independence Ave, Kansas City, MO 64106 USA
| | - Peigang Yang
- grid.452582.cThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011 Hebei China ,Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China
| | - Yuan Tian
- grid.452582.cThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011 Hebei China ,Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China
| | - Yang Liu
- grid.452582.cThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011 Hebei China ,Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China
| | - Lingjiao Meng
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China ,grid.452582.cResearch Center of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China
| | - Qun Zhao
- grid.452582.cThe Third Department of Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011 Hebei China ,Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011 China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma LY, Liu ZQ, Yao L, Xu MD, Chen SY, Zhong YS, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, Ma LL, Qin WZ, Hu JW, Cai MY, Yao LQ, Li QL, Zhou PH. Endoscopic resection of upper GI extraluminal tumors (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:752-763.e6. [PMID: 35724694 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic resection is a feasible treatment for GI extraluminal tumors but remains a challenging procedure with limited data. In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumors in the upper GI tract. METHODS From May 2016 to December 2021, 109 patients undergoing endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumors in the upper GI tract were retrospectively included. Clinicopathologic characteristics, procedure-related parameters, adverse events (AEs), and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS The en-bloc tumor resection rate was 94.5% and en-bloc retrieval rate 86.2%. Statistical analysis revealed tumor size ≥3.0 cm and irregular shape as significant risk factors for piecemeal extraction. Resection time and suture time were 46.8 ± 33.6 minutes and 20.6 ± 20.1 minutes, respectively. Large tumor size was significantly associated with a longer procedure duration. Five patients (4.6%) experienced major AEs, including recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hydrothorax, major bleeding, local peritonitis, duodenal leakage, and repeat endoscopic surgery for tumor extraction. Minor AEs occurred in 13 patients (11.9%). Irregular tumor shape and tumor location (duodenum) were significantly associated with AE occurrence. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.7 ± 3.3 days. No recurrence or metastasis was observed during the mean follow-up period of 31.8 ± 15.2 months. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic resection is a safe and feasible therapeutic approach for upper GI extraluminal tumors. Tumor size, shape, and location impact the difficulty and safety of the procedure. Endoscopic resection of duodenal tumors is also feasible but associated with an increased risk of AEs compared with tumors in other locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Yun Ma
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zu-Qiang Liu
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Yao
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mei-Dong Xu
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shi-Yao Chen
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun-Shi Zhong
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Qun Zhang
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei-Feng Chen
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li-Li Ma
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Zheng Qin
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian-Wei Hu
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming-Yan Cai
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li-Qing Yao
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Quan-Lin Li
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping-Hong Zhou
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Diagnosis of Small Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12040810. [PMID: 35453857 PMCID: PMC9027519 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been widely accepted in the diagnosis of all types of tumors, especially pancreatic tumors, lymph nodes, and subepithelial lesions (SELs). One reason is that the examination can provide a detailed observation, with tissue samples being immediately obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Many SELs are detected incidentally during endoscopic examinations without symptoms. Most SELs are mesenchymal tumors originating from the fourth layer, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), leiomyomas, and schwannomas. GISTs are potentially malignant. Surgical treatment is recommended for localized GISTs of ≥20 mm. However, the indications for the diagnosis and follow-up of GISTs of <20 mm in size are controversial. There are several reports on the rapid progression or metastasis of small GISTs. Therefore, it is important to determine whether a SEL is a GIST or not. The main diagnostic method is EUS-FNA. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using a new biopsy needle has been reported to obtain larger tissue samples. Additionally, various biopsy methods have been reported to have a high diagnostic rate for small GISTs. In local gastric SELs, regardless of the tumor size, EUS can be performed first; then, EUS-FNA/B or various biopsy methods can be used to obtain tissue samples for decision-making in relation to therapy and the follow-up period.
Collapse
|