Transporter‑mediated drug‑drug interactions involving poly (ADP‑ribose) polymerase inhibitors (Review)

PARP inhibitor-related acute renal failure: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database

BACKGROUND

Current clinical trial data on PARP inhibitors (PARPis)-related acute renal failure (ARF) are not entirely representative of real-world situations. Therefore, in this study, the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was used to evaluate PARPis-related ARF.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were obtained from 1 January 2015, to 30 September 2023. ARF event reports were analyzed based on four algorithms. The time-to-onset (TTO) and clinical outcomes of PARPis-associated ARF were assessed.

RESULTS

The total included cases were 2726. Significant signals were observed for olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib (reporting odds ratio (ROR): 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-1.781.25, 95% CI: 1.19-1.32and 1.59, 95% CI: 1.47-1.72 respectively), which all had positive signals for 'blood creatinine increased' and 'glomerular filtration rate decreased.' The median TTO of ARF onset was 57, 36, and 85 days for olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, respectively. The proportions of deaths, life-threatening events, and hospitalization adverse events (AEs) associated with ARF werewas 4.27%, 3.57%, and 19.80%, respectively. The proportion of deaths with olaparib (9.88%) was significantly higher than for niraparib (2.52%) and rucaparib (2.94%) (p < 0.005). The proportion of life-threatening AEs associated with niraparib (4.89%) was significantly higher than for rucaparib (0.98%) (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

ARF and PARPi were related, with the exception of talazoparib. Elevated creatinine levels and decreased glomerular filtration rates were associated with olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib. More emphasis should be given to PARPis-related ARF due to the high proportion of serious AEs and delayed adverse reactions.

Unveiling the mechanisms and challenges of cancer drug resistance

Cancer treatment faces many hurdles and resistance is one among them. Anti-cancer treatment strategies are evolving due to innate and acquired resistance capacity, governed by genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, metabolic, or microenvironmental cues that ultimately enable selected cancer cells to survive and progress under unfavorable conditions. Although the mechanism of drug resistance is being widely studied to generate new target-based drugs with better potency than existing ones. However, due to the broader flexibility in acquired drug resistance, advanced therapeutic options with better efficacy need to be explored. Combination therapy is an alternative with a better success rate though the risk of amplified side effects is commonplace. Moreover, recent groundbreaking precision immune therapy is one of the ways to overcome drug resistance and has revolutionized anticancer therapy to a greater extent with the only limitation of being individual-specific and needs further attention. This review will focus on the challenges and strategies opted by cancer cells to withstand the current therapies at the molecular level and also highlights the emerging therapeutic options -like immunological, and stem cell-based options that may prove to have better potential to challenge the existing problem of therapy resistance. Video Abstract.

The multifaceted role of Fragile X-Related Protein 1 (FXR1) in cellular processes: an updated review on cancer and clinical applications

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) modulate the expression level of several target RNAs (such as mRNAs) post-transcriptionally through interactions with unique binding sites in the 3'-untranslated region. There is mounting information that suggests RBP dysregulation plays a significant role in carcinogenesis. However, the function of FMR1 autosomal homolog 1(FXR1) in malignancies is just beginning to be unveiled. Due to the diversity of their RNA-binding domains and functional adaptability, FXR1 can regulate diverse transcript processing. Changes in FXR1 interaction with RNA networks have been linked to the emergence of cancer, although the theoretical framework defining these alterations in interaction is insufficient. Alteration in FXR1 expression or localization has been linked to the mRNAs of cancer suppressor genes, cancer-causing genes, and genes involved in genomic expression stability. In particular, FXR1-mediated gene regulation involves in several cellular phenomena related to cancer growth, metastasis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, senescence, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. FXR1 dysregulation has been implicated in diverse cancer types, suggesting its diagnostic and therapeutic potential. However, the molecular mechanisms and biological effects of FXR1 regulation in cancer have yet to be understood. This review highlights the current knowledge of FXR1 expression and function in various cancer situations, emphasizing its functional variety and complexity. We further address the challenges and opportunities of targeting FXR1 for cancer diagnosis and treatment and propose future directions for FXR1 research in oncology. This work intends to provide an in-depth review of FXR1 as an emerging oncotarget with multiple roles and implications in cancer biology and therapy.

Exploring pharmacokinetics of talazoparib in ABCB1/ABCG2-deficient mice using a novel UHPLC-MS/MS method

A rapid, sensitive, and simple UHPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of the PARP inhibitor talazoparib in mouse plasma was developed and validated using [13C,2H4]-talazoparib as an internal standard (IS). The assay procedure involved extraction of talazoparib and the IS from plasma using a single-step deproteination and separation of the analytes was achieved on an ACQUITY UPLC RP18 HSS T3 column with a mobile phase gradient at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min in a run time of 5 min. The calibration curve was linear (r2 > 0.99) over the concentration range of 0.5-100 ng/mL, and 10-fold dilution of samples could be accurately quantitated. The matrix effect and mean extraction recovery for talazoparib were between 93.7-109% and 87.7-105%, respectively. Precision and percent bias of quality control samples were always less than ±15%, indicating reproducibility and accuracy of the method. Talazoparib demonstrated bench-top stability at room temperature for 6 h, auto-sampler and reinjection stability at 4 °C for at least 24 h, and no significant degradation was observed after three freeze-thaw cycles. The developed method was successfully applied to pharmacokinetic studies involving serial blood sampling after oral administration of talazoparib to wild-type mice and animals with a genetic deficiency of the efflux transporters ABCB1 (P-gp) and ABCG2 (BCRP). Together, our results demonstrate the successful development of a suitable analytical method for talazoparib in mouse plasma and suggest that mice are a useful model to evaluate transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions involving therapy with talazoparib.