Impact of MAGE-A antigens on taxane response in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Cancer testis antigens: Emerging therapeutic targets leveraging genomic instability in cancer

Cancer care has witnessed remarkable progress in recent decades, with a wide array of targeted therapies and immune-based interventions being added to the traditional treatment options such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, despite these advancements, the challenge of achieving high tumor specificity while minimizing adverse side effects continues to dictate the benefit-risk balance of cancer therapy, guiding clinical decision making. As such, the targeting of cancer testis antigens (CTAs) offers exciting new opportunities for therapeutic intervention of cancer since they display highly tumor specific expression patterns, natural immunogenicity and play pivotal roles in various biological processes that are critical for tumor cellular fitness. In this review, we delve deeper into how CTAs contribute to the regulation and maintenance of genomic integrity in cancer, and how these mechanisms can be exploited to specifically target and eradicate tumor cells. We review the current clinical trials targeting aforementioned CTAs, highlight promising pre-clinical data and discuss current challenges and future perspectives for future development of CTA-based strategies that exploit tumor genomic instability.

MAGE-A1-6 expression in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: impact on clinical patterns and oncologic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Various subtypes of melanoma-associated antigens (MAGEs) are expressed in the tumor tissues of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, little data are currently available on how the gene expression of MAGEs impacts clinical patterns and oncologic outcomes. We have therefore evaluated the expression of MAGE-A1-6 (A1-6) subtypes in tumor tissues of patients with HNSCC and the clinical impact of this expression.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 53 patients with histologically proven HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx who underwent both treatment and analysis by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay with a common primer to identify the expression of MAGE-A1-6 subtypes in the tumor tissue. The clinicopathologic factors and oncologic outcomes of these patients and the correlations of both to MAGE-A1-6 gene expression were analyzed.

RESULTS

MAGE-A1-6 subtypes were expressed in the tumor tissues of 37 patients (69.8 %). Patient age of ≥65 years [p = 0.031, hazard ratio (HR) 4.866] and advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (p = 0.035, HR 4.291) were independent risk factors for expression of MAGE-A1-6 subtypes. Patients with MAGE-A1-6 expression had lower disease-free survival (p = 0.029), disease-specific survival (p = 0.070), and overall survival (p = 0.017) rates. Overall survival rate was independently associated to chemotherapy (p = 0.011, HR 2.859), while no surgery (p = 0.050, HR 2.400) and MAGE-A1-6 expression (p = 0.050, HR 2.527) showed borderline significance.

CONCLUSION

In our patient group the expression of MAGE-A1-6 subtypes in tumor tissues of patients with HNSCC was correlated with advanced clinical stage of cancer and poor oncologic outcomes. We suggest that gene expression of MAGE-A1-6 subtypes may be considered to be a predictive factor to determine patient treatment or follow-up strategy.

Expression of MAGE-A1-A12 subgroups in the invasive tumor front and tumor center in oral squamous cell carcinoma

MAGE-A proteins are highly expressed in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and are promising targets for cancer immunotherapy. This study examined the presence of MAGE-A expression within the tumor center (TC) and tumor invasive front (TIF) and evaluated its relationship to poor prognosis. The expression rate of each MAGE-A subtype, A1-A12, was examined in 68 OSCCs at the TIF and TC. Slides (1-µm) of tissue microarrays (diameter =0.6 mm) were immunohistochemically stained, and the findings were correlated to clinical data. Approximately 95% of the tumors had MAGE-A expression. Higher expression in the TC was shown significantly for MAGE-A1, -A5, -A6, -A9 and -A12 (P<0.05). MAGE-A2 and -A3 exhibited the opposite behavior (not significant, P>0.05). Age, tumor size, grade and survival time were not associated with the expression of certain MAGE-A subgroups. When expression in the whole tumor tissue was considered, only MAGE-A1 was expressed at a significantly higher rate in male patients (P=0.034). At the TIF, MAGE-A9 and the UICC disease stage were significantly correlated (P=0.0263), and MAGE-A6 and the UICC disease stage exhibited a strong trend (P=0.0596). The expression of MAGE-A3, -A4, -A5, -A9 and -A11 was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, while MAGE-A4 was expressed in all regions of the tumors (TIF and TC). This study showed that higher expression of most MAGE-A antigens occurred at the TC rather than at the TIF. MAGE‑A1, -A3, -A4, -A5, -A9 and -A11 were significantly associated with clinically advanced stages of disease and seem to be of particular interest.

Correlation of MAGE-A tumor antigens and the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic agents in head and neck carcinoma cells

OBJECTIVES

The present study examined the relationship between MAGE-A tumor antigens and the efficacy of diamindichloridoplatin (DDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), docetaxel, and paclitaxel for in vitro treatment of head and neck cancer.

METHODS

In the present study, five cell lines of human squamous cell carcinomas were treated with DDP (25-400 μM), 5-FU (0.75-12 mM), docetaxel (1.56-25 nM), and paclitaxel (1.56-25 nM) for a period of 24 or 48 h. The efficacy of the agents was observed dynamically using real-time cell analysis. Subsequently, the expression levels of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A5, MAGE-A8, MAGE-A9, MAGE-A11, and MAGE-A12 were determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Chemosensitivity and MAGE-A-expression were correlated by linear regression.

RESULTS

The tumor cell lines showed a highly differentiated response to the chemotherapeutic agents. Expression of MAGE-A11 was significantly associated with a poorer response to treatment with DDP, 5-FU, docetaxel, and paclitaxel. Two cell lines, one of which was MAGE-A11-positive, showed a significant and concentration-dependent cisplatin-induced growth spurt during the first 24 h after treatment. MAGE-A5 was connected to a positive effect on treatment with paclitaxel within the first 24 h after application. In association with docetaxel treatment, MAGE-A8 was connected to a poorer susceptibility.

CONCLUSIONS

The results describe, for the first time, a correlation between these MAGE-A tumor antigens and the susceptibility of head and neck cancer cells to DDP, 5-FU, docetaxel, and paclitaxel.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings could affect the antineoplastic treatment of patients with MAGE-A11-positive tumors.