Combination of Ad-sTRAIL with the chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin synergistically enhances their pro-apoptotic ability in human breast cancer cells

Synthetic ligands of death receptor 5 display a cell-selective agonistic effect at different oligomerization levels

DR4 (Death Receptor 4) and DR5 (Death Receptor 5) are two potential targets for cancer therapy due to their ability to trigger apoptosis of cancer cells, but not normal ones, when activated by their cognate ligand TRAIL (TNF related apoptosis-inducing ligand). Therapies based on soluble recombinant TRAIL or agonist antibodies directed against one of the receptors are currently under clinical trials. However, TRAIL-R positive tumor cells are frequently resistant to TRAIL induced apoptosis. The precise mechanisms of this resistance are still not entirely understood. We have previously reported on synthetic peptides that bind to DR5 (TRAIL^mim/DR5) and induce tumor cell apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Here, we showed that while hexameric soluble TRAIL is able to efficiently kill the DR5 positive lymphoma Jurkat or the carcinoma HCT116, these cells are resistant to apoptosis induced by the divalent form of TRAIL^mim/DR5 and are poorly sensitive to apoptosis induced by an anti-DR5 agonist monoclonal antibody. This resistance can be restored by the cross-linking of anti-DR5 agonist antibody but not by the cross-linking of the divalent form of TRAIL^mim/DR5. Interestingly, the divalent form of TRAIL^mim/DR5 that induced apoptosis of DR5 positive BJAB cells, acts as an inhibitor of TRAIL-induced apoptosis on Jurkat and HCT116 cells. The rapid internalization of DR5 observed when treated with divalent form of TRAIL^mim/DR5 could explain the antagonist activity of the ligand on Jurkat and HCT116 cells but also highlights the independence of the mechanisms responsible for internalization and activation when triggering the DR5 apoptotic cascade.

Downregulation of SNAIL sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by regulating the NF-κB pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the second most lethal cancer worldwide. Evidence has shown HCC cell resistance to TRAIL‑mediated apoptosis. In a previous study, we verified that silencing SNAIL downregulated the growth of HCC cells. In addition, the mechanism of resistance to TRAIL in HCC cells was connected with the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB). Thus, it was hypothesized that the downregultaion of SNAIL sensitizes HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by regulating the NF-κB pathway. In the present study, the most effective lentiviral vectors carrying shRNA against SNAIL were selected and adenoviral vectors harboring TRAIL were constructed. The expression of SNAIL and TRAIL was detected by quantitative PCR and western blotting. HCC cell viability and apoptosis were assessed using an MTT assay and the Hoechst test. To determine how to sensitize HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis after silencing SNAIL, p53 was assessed by western blot analysis. We also investigated the expression of Bcl-xL, cIAP2, survivin and Raf-1 protein using western blot analysis and the apoptotic degree of HuH-7 cells was detected using the Hoechst test following the suppression of each gene, which was a possible molecular mechanism to sensitive TRAIL-induced apoptosis through the downregulation of SNAIL in HCC cells. Silencing SNAIL resulted in increased apoptosis by enhancing sensitization to TRAIL in all the HCC cells. Additionally, p53 protein was upregulated in HuH-7 cells. Expression of Bcl-xL, cIAP2, survivin and Raf-1 was downregulated following silencing of SNAIL, while down-regulation of any of the proteins contributed to SNAIL suppression enhancing HCC cell sensitivity to TRAIL‑induced apoptosis, with the exception of cIAP2. The results demonstrated that silencing SNAIL can sensitize TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HCC cells by upregulating p53 protein and by regulating related genes of the NF-κB pathway such as Bcl-xL, survivin and Raf-1.