Kindlin-2 promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression through the Wnt signaling pathway

Elevated expression of ADAP2 is associated with aggressive behavior of human clear-cell renal cell carcinoma and poor patient survival

BACKGROUND

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common and lethal cancer of the adult kidney. ADAP2 is a GTPase-activating protein was upregulated in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The role of ADAP2 in ccRCC progression is unknown.

METHODS

ADAP2 expression in ccRCC cell lines and tissues was examined via real-time PCR, Western blot and IHC. MTS, colony formation and transwell assay to explore the role of ADAP2 in ccRCC. ADAP2 in growth and metastasis of ccRCC were evaluated in vivo through ccRCC xenograft tumor growth, lung metastatic mice model. The prognostic role of ADAP2 was evaluated by survival analysis.

RESULTS

ADAP2 mRNA was expressed at significantly higher levels in 23 pairs of ccRCC tissues than in normal kidney tissues (P < 0.01). Immunohistochemical analysis of 298 ccRCC tissues revealed elevated ADAP2 expression as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for the overall survival (P = 0.0042) and progression-free survival (P = 0.0232) of patients. The KaplanMeier survival curve showed that patients with a higher expression of ADAP2 showed a significantly lower overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate. Moreover, high expression of ADAP2 at the mRNA level was associated with a worse prognosis for overall survival (P = 0.0083) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. In vivo and in vitro functional study showed that overexpression of ADAP2 promotes ccRCC cell proliferation and metastasis ability, whereas knockdown of ADAP2 inhibited cell proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion.

CONCLUSION

ADAP2 is a novel prognostic marker and could promotes tumor progression in ccRCC.

Prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) based on a six-lncRNA-based risk score: an investigation based on RNA-sequencing data

Background

The scientific understanding of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has improved in recent decades. Nevertheless, there has been little research into the role that lncRNAs play in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). More lncRNAs are assumed to influence the progression of ccRCC via their own molecular mechanisms.

Methods

This study investigated the prognostic significance of differentially expressed lncRNAs by mining high-throughput lncRNA-sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) containing 13,198 lncRNAs from 539 patients. Differentially expressed lncRNAs were assessed using the R packages edgeR and DESeq. The prognostic significance of lncRNAs was measured using univariate Cox proportional hazards regression. ccRCC patients were then categorized into high- and low-score cohorts based on the cumulative distribution curve inflection point the of risk score, which was generated by the multivariate Cox regression model. Samples from the TCGA dataset were divided into training and validation subsets to verify the prognostic risk model. Bioinformatics methods, gene set enrichment analysis, and protein–protein interaction networks, Gene Ontology, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses were subsequently used.

Results

It was found that the risk score based on 6 novel lncRNAs (CTA-384D8.35, CTD-2263F21.1, LINC01510, RP11-352G9.1, RP11-395B7.2, RP11-426C22.4) exhibited superior prognostic value for ccRCC. Moreover, we categorized the cases into two groups (high-risk and low-risk), and also examined related pathways and genetic differences between them. Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that the median survival time of patients in the high-risk group was 73.5 months, much shorter than that of the low-risk group (112.6 months; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the risk score predicted the 5-year survival of all 539 ccRCC patients (AUC at 5 years, 0.683; concordance index [C-index], 0.853; 95% CI 0.817–0.889). The training set and validation set also showed similar performance (AUC at 5 years, 0.649 and 0.681, respectively; C-index, 0.822 and 0.891; 95% CI 0.774–0.870 and 0.844–0.938).

Conclusions

The results of this study can be applied to analyzing various prognostic factors, leading to new possibilities for clinical diagnosis and prognosis of ccRCC.

Prognostic value of Kindlin-2 expression in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis

Background

Kindlin-2 is one of the Kindlin family members which are evolutionarily conserved focal adhesion proteins with integrin β-binding affinity. Recently, accumulative studies have suggested that Kindlin-2 plays important roles in tumor biology. However, the prognostic significance of Kindlin-2 in patients with solid tumors remains controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the prognostic value of Kindlin-2 in solid tumors via meta-analysis.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and EBSCO for all relevant studies reporting the prognostic significance of Kindlin-2 expression in solid cancer patients. The summary hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to estimate the association between Kindlin-2 expression with survival of solid cancer patients.

Results

We included 14 eligible studies containing 1869 patients in our meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that high Kindlin-2 expression was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (pooled HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.44–1.92, P < 0.0001), disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS)/progression-free survival (PFS) (pooled HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.16–2.57, P = 0.0067). For certain tumor types, high Kindlin-2 expression was significantly correlated with a poor outcome in patients with solid tumors, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DFS/RFS/PFS), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OS, DFS/RFS/PFS), hepatocellular carcinoma (OS), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (OS), bladder cancer (OS, DFS/RFS/PFS), chondrosarcoma (OS), osteosarcoma (OS), gastric cancer (DFS/RFS/PFS), and glioma (OS).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that high Kindlin-2 expression might indicate poor outcome in patients with solid tumors and could serve as a prognostic biomarker for solid cancer patients.