Clinicopathological features and diagnostic methods of ALK fusion‑positive non‑small cell lung cancer in Korea

Therapeutic Advances of Rare ALK Fusions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases and is the leading cause of cancer-related death. Despite advances in chemotherapy and immunotherapy, the prognosis for advanced patients remains poor. The discovery of oncogenic driver mutations, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations, means that a subset of patients has opportunities for targeted therapy. With the improvement of genetic testing coverage, more and more ALK fusion subtypes and ALK partners have been discovered, and more than 90 rare ALK fusion subtypes have been found in NSCLC. However, unlike the common fusion, echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK, some rare ALK fusions such as striatin (STRN)-ALK and huntingtin interacting protein 1 (HIP1)-ALK, etc., the large-scale clinical data related to its efficacy are still immature. The clinical application of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) mainly depends on the positivity of the ALK gene, regardless of the molecular characteristics of the fusion partner. Recent clinical studies in the ALK-positive NSCLC population have demonstrated differences in progression-free survival (PFS) among patients based on different ALK fusion subtypes. This article will introduce the biological characteristics of ALK fusion kinase and common detection methods of ALK fusion and focus on summarizing the differential responses of several rare ALK fusions to ALK-TKIs, and propose corresponding treatment strategies, so as to better guide the application of ALK-TKIs in rare ALK fusion population.

Case Report: A Pregnant Woman Diagnosed as ALK-Rearrangement Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Cancer With Brain Metastasis

Concomitant malignant tumors and pregnancy present many difficult questions to both clinicians and patients. Due to no specific guidelines, each aspect of clinical management requires special considerations. This current report presents a rare case of a 38-year-old pregnant woman at gestational age 33 weeks with complaints of weakness of her right limbs for 2 weeks. After successive cesarean section and craniotomy, a diagnosis of lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) metastatic to the brain was eventually made. Next generation sequencing (NGS) showed ALK-EML4 gene fusion. Immediately afterwards she was started on the targeted therapy with the ALK inhibitor alectinib. Ten months later, all known lesions exhibited a rapid regression, and no new brain metastases were found. Consequently, the therapeutic effect was considered as a partial response. Then, we review the previous literature using PubMed on maternal malignant brain tumors diagnosed during pregnancy, or lung LCNEC associated with ALK fusion, or ALK inhibitors treatment among the pregnant women, eventually, and discuss the concerns of dealing with these patients.

Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing and Ventana Immunohistochemistry in Detecting ALK Rearrangements and Predicting the Efficacy of First-Line Crizotinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

Reliable diagnostic approaches to detect ALK rearrangement are critical for selecting patients eligible for crizotinib therapy. This study aimed to compare next-generation sequencing (NGS) and Ventana immunohistochemistry (IHC) in evaluating ALK rearrangements and evaluate their impact on first-line crizotinib efficacy.

Patients and Methods

A total of 472 NSCLC patients were identified as ALK-positive by NGS and/or IHC between March 2014 and February 2020. The concordance of ALK detection, overall response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed for 319 patients who received front-line crizotinib.

Results

First-line crizotinib (n=319) significantly prolonged PFS in comparison with chemotherapy (n=46; 12.0 vs 6.8 months; p<0.0001). Of the 76 crizotinib-treated patients whose ALK status was assessed by both NGS and IHC, 78.9% of the patients had concordant ALK status (NGS-positive/IHC-positive), 18.4% patients were NGS-positive but IHC-negative, and 2 patients were IHC-positive but NGS-negative. Different detection assays confer no statistical difference in ORR and PFS with first-line crizotinib. The ORR in NGS only, IHC only, and both NGS and IHC was 84.3%, 90.1%, and 88.1%, respectively, while PFS was 11.4, 13.0, and 11.0 months, respectively. The ORR in NGS-positive/IHC-positive and NGS-positive/IHC-negative patients was 85.4% and 92.8%, respectively. Compared to NGS-positive/IHC-positive patients, those with NGS-positive/IHC-negative results had a trend of shorter PFS but statistical significance was not reached (mPFS, 5.9 months vs 11.5 months, p=0.43).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that ALK status detected by NGS and/or IHC is reliable in identifying patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who will benefit from ALK inhibitor therapy.