Towards harmonization of DNA metabarcoding for monitoring marine macrobenthos: the effect of technical replicates and pooled DNA extractions on species detection

Evaluating the Reproducibility of Amplicon Sequencing Data Derived from Deep-Sea Cold Seep Sediment-Associated Microbiota

Benefiting from the rapid developments and wide applications of high-throughput sequencing, great advancements have been made in investigating microbiota, which are highly diverse and play key roles in both element cycling and the energy flow of ecosystems. There have been inherent limitations of amplicon sequencing that could introduce uncertainty and raise concerns about the accuracy and reproducibility of this technology. However, studies focusing on the reproducibility of amplicon sequencing are limited, especially in characterizing microbial communities in deep-sea sediments. To evaluate reproducibility, 118 deep-sea sediment samples were used for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in technical replicates (repeated measurements of the same sample) that demonstrate the variability of amplicon sequencing. The average occurrence-based overlaps were 35.98% and 27.02% between two and among three technical replicates, respectively, whereas their abundance-based overlaps reached 84.88% and 83.16%, respectively. Although variations of alpha and beta diversity indices were found between/among technical replicates, alpha diversity indices were similar across samples, and the average beta diversity indices were much smaller for technical replicates than among samples. Moreover, clustering methods (i.e., operational taxonomic units [OTUs] and amplicon sequence variants [ASVs]) were shown to have little impact on the alpha and beta diversity patterns of microbial communities. Taken together, although there are variations between/among technical replicates, amplicon sequencing is still a powerful tool with which to reveal diversity patterns of microbiota in deep-sea sediments. IMPORTANCE The reproducibility of amplicon sequencing is vital for whether the diversities of microbial communities could be accurately estimated. Thus, reproducibility influences the drawing of sound ecological conclusions. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on the reproducibility of microbial communities that are characterized by amplicon sequencing, and studies focusing on microbiota in deep-sea sediments have been especially lacking. In this study, we evaluated the reproducibility of amplicon sequencing targeting microbiota in deep-sea sediments of cold seep. Our results revealed that there were variations between/among technical replicates and that amplicon sequencing was still a powerful tool with which to characterize the diversities of microbial communities in deep-sea sediments. This study provides valuable guidelines for the reproducibility evaluation of future work in experimental design and interpretation.

Maximizing the reliability and the number of species assignments in metabarcoding studies using a curated regional library and a public repository

Biodiversity assessments relying on DNA have increased rapidly over the last decade. However, the reliability of taxonomic assignments in metabarcoding studies is variable and affected by the reference databases and the assignment methods used. Species level assignments are usually considered as reliable using regional libraries but unreliable using public repositories. In this study, we aimed to test this assumption for metazoan species detected in the Gulf of St. Lawrence in the Northwest Atlantic. We first created a regional library (GSL-rl) by data mining COI barcode sequences from BOLD, and included a reliability ranking system for species assignments. We then estimated 1) the accuracy and precision of the public repository NCBI-nt for species assignments using sequences from the regional library and 2) compared the detection and reliability of species assignments of a metabarcoding dataset using either NCBI-nt or the regional library and popular assignment methods. With NCBI-nt and sequences from the regional library, the BLAST-LCA (least common ancestor) method was the most precise method for species assignments, but the accuracy was higher with the BLAST-TopHit method (>80% over all taxa, between 70% and 90% amongst taxonomic groups). With the metabarcoding dataset, the reliability of species assignments was greater using GSL-rl compared to NCBI-nt. However, we also observed that the total number of reliable species assignments could be maximized using both GSL-rl and NCBI-nt with different optimized assignment methods. The use of a two-step approach for species assignments, i.e., using a regional library and a public repository, could improve the reliability and the number of detected species in metabarcoding studies.

Are genomic indices effective alternatives to morphology based benthic indices in biomonitoring studies? Perspectives from a major harbour and marine protected area

Ecological assessments are currently being conducted by traditional morpho-taxonomical identification techniques that are time-consuming and often inaccurate. Biomonitoring programs are increasingly being complemented by the more rapid and efficient DNA barcoding approach. We compared the congruency of morpho-taxonomic (AMBI - AZTI's Marine Biotic Index) and genomic (gAMBI) benthic indices in ecological quality status (EcoQS) assignation in Mumbai harbour and Malvan Marine Protected area (MPA). The study, first of its kind to adopt the gAMBI tool in the selected milieu, contributed substantial number of macrobenthic cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) sequences that were previously unavailable in the reference library, adding sufficient genetic resources for establishing ecostatus. AMBI and gAMBI values based on presence/absence data related significantly with those derived from abundance data matrices. Taxonomic and genomic indices derived ecostatus corresponded sufficiently well despite minor discrepancies, underscoring the viability of gAMBI as a superior alternative to AMBI in monitoring studies.

Spider webs as eDNA samplers: biodiversity assessment across the tree of life

The concept of environmental DNA (eDNA) utilizes nucleic acids of organisms directly from the environment. Recent breakthrough studies have successfully detected a wide spectrum of prokaryotic and eukaryotic eDNA from a variety of environments, ranging from ancient to modern, and from terrestrial to aquatic. With their diversity and ubiquity in nature, spider webs might act as powerful biofilters and could thus represent a promising new source of eDNA, but their utility under natural field conditions is severely understudied. Here, we bridge this knowledge gap to establish spider webs as a source of eDNA with far reaching implications. First, we conducted a field study to track specific arthropod targets from different spider webs. We then employed high-throughput amplicon sequencing of taxonomic barcodes to investigate the utility of spider web eDNA for biodiversity monitoring of animals, fungi, and bacteria. Our results show that genetic remains on spider webs allow the detection of even the smallest target organisms. We also demonstrate that eDNA from spider webs is useful in research of community compositions across the different domains of life, with potentially highly detailed temporal and spatial information.