1
|
Degtjarenko P, Mark K, Moisejevs R, Himelbrant D, Stepanchikova I, Tsurykau A, Randlane T, Scheidegger C. Low genetic differentiation between apotheciate Usnea florida and sorediate Usnea subfloridana (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) based on microsatellite data. Fungal Biol 2020; 124:892-902. [PMID: 32948277 DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Accurate species delimitation has a pivotal role in conservation biology, and it is especially important for threatened species where decisions have political and economic consequences. Finding and applying appropriate character sets and analytical tools to resolve interspecific relationships remains challenging in lichenized fungi. The main aim of our study was to re-assess the species boundaries between Usnea subfloridana and Usnea florida, which have been phylogenetically indistinguishable until now, but are different in reproductive mode and ecological preferences, using fungal-specific simple sequence repeats (SSR), i.e. microsatellite markers. Bayesian clustering analysis, discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC), minimal spanning network (MSN), and principal component analysis (PCA) failed to separate U. florida and U. subfloridana populations. However, a low significant differentiation between the two taxa was observed across all populations according to AMOVA results. Also, analysis of shared haplotypes and statistical difference in clonal diversity (M) supported the present-day isolation between the apotheciate U. florida and predominantly sorediate U. subfloridana. Our results do not provide a clear support either for the separation of species in this pair or the synonymization of U. florida and U. subfloridana. We suggest that genome-wide data could help resolve the taxonomic question in this species pair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polina Degtjarenko
- Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland; Department of Botany, University of Tartu, Lai 40, 51005, Tartu, Estonia; Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Parādes 1a, 5401, Daugavpils, Latvia.
| | - Kristiina Mark
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Fr.R.Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Rolands Moisejevs
- Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Parādes 1a, 5401, Daugavpils, Latvia
| | - Dmitry Himelbrant
- Department of Botany, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Emb. 7-9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia; Laboratory of Lichenology and Bryology, Komarov Botanical Institute RAS, Professor Popov St. 2, 197376, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Irina Stepanchikova
- Department of Botany, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Emb. 7-9, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia; Laboratory of Lichenology and Bryology, Komarov Botanical Institute RAS, Professor Popov St. 2, 197376, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Andrei Tsurykau
- Department of Biology, F. Skorina Gomel State University, Sovetskaja Str. 104, BY-246019, Gomel, Belarus; Department of Ecology, Botany and Nature Protection, Institute of Natural Sciences, Samara National Research University, Moskovskoye Shosse 34, 443086, Samara, Russia
| | - Tiina Randlane
- Department of Botany, University of Tartu, Lai 40, 51005, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Christoph Scheidegger
- Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|