Synthesis, docking study, and in vitro anticancer evaluation of new flufenamic acid derivatives

New Indole-6-Carboxylic Acid Derivatives as Multi-Target Antiproliferative Agents: Synthesis, in Silico Studies, and Cytotoxicity Evaluation

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) are commonly overexpressed in cancers making them appealing targets for cancer therapeutics. Two groups of indole-6-carboxylic acid derivatives, hydrazone derivatives targeting EGFR and oxadiazole derivatives targeting VEGFR-2, were synthesized and characterized using FT-IR, 1 H-NMR, 13 CNMR, and HR-MS techniques. Binding patterns to potential molecular targets were studied using molecular docking and compared to standard EGFR and VEGFR-2 inhibitors. The newly synthesized compounds were cytotoxic to the three cancer cell lines tested (HCT-116, HeLa, and HT-29 cell lines) as evaluated by the MTT assay. Compound 3 b (EGFR-targeting) and compound 6 e (VEGFR-2-targeting) possessed the highest antiproliferation activity, were cancer-selective, arrested cancer cells in the G2/M phase, induced the extrinsic apoptosis pathway, and had the highest EGFR/VEGFR-2 enzyme inhibitory activity, respectively. The structure-activity relationships of the new compounds showed that the presence of an aryl or heteroaryl fragment attached to a linker is required for the anti-tumor activity. In conclusion, the findings of the current study suggest that compounds 3 b and 6 e are promising cytotoxic agents that act by inhibiting EGFR and VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinases, respectively.

Synthesis, docking study, and structure-activity relationship of novel niflumic acid derivatives acting as anticancer agents by inhibiting VEGFR or EGFR tyrosine kinase activities

A new series of niflumic acid (NF) derivatives were synthesized by esterification of (NF) to give ester compound 1, which was treated with hydrazine hydrate to produce (NF) hydrazide 2. Hydrazine-1-carboxamide compounds (3A–C), and hydrazine-1-carbothioamide derivatives (4A–D) were synthesized by treatment of (NF) hydrazide with phenyl isocyanate, and phenyl isothiocyanate derivatives, respectively. The cyclization of (4B–D) and (3B) was achieved using NaOH solution to produce 1,2,4-triazole derivatives (5A–C) and 6, respectively. The prepared compounds were characterized using IR, 1HNMR, 13CNMR, and MS (ESI) spectroscopy. A molecular docking study was performed to evaluate the binding affinity of the synthesized compounds against EGFR and VEGFR kinase domains which revealed that compounds 3B, and 4A had the best binding energy (-7.87, and -7.33 kcal/mol, respectively) against VEGFR, while compound 5A had the best binding energy (-7.95 kcal/mol) against EGFR. The biological investigation results indicated that all the tested compounds caused cell killing in the two cancer cell lines (Hep G2 and A549) studied, with compound 4C being the most cytotoxic, as well as being cancer selective. Additionally, compound 4C-treated Hep G2 cells were arrested at the S and G2/M cell cycle phases. Cytotoxicity of compound 4C was attributed to apoptosis as determined by flow cytometry and qRT-PCR results of the apoptosis markers p53, BAX, and caspase-3. Finally, compound 4C inhibited VEGFR kinase activity, while compound 5B inhibited EGFR kinase activity. In conclusion, the novel (NF) derivatives are potent anticancer agents, inhibiting cell proliferation by inhibiting EGFR and VEGFR tyrosine kinase enzymes.

Synthesis, docking study, and structure activity relationship of novel anti-tumor 1, 2, 4 triazole derivatives incorporating 2-(2, 3- dimethyl aminobenzoic acid) moiety

A series of 1,2,4 triazole derivatives (H7-12) have been synthesized by reacting an excess of hydrazine hydrate with carbothioamide derivatives (H1-6). The final compounds (HB1-HB6) were synthesized by reacting the triazole derivatives with mefenamic acid using DCC as a coupling agent. The chemical structures were confirmed by FT-IR, 1H, and 13C-NMR spectra, and some physicochemical properties were determined. The cytotoxicity of the different compounds (HB1-HB6) was evaluated by the MTT assay against two human epithelial cancer cell lines, A549 lung carcinoma and Hep G2 hepatocyte carcinoma, and one normal human cell line WI-38 lung fibroblasts. The mode of cell killing (apoptosis versus necrosis), as well as the effect on cell cycle phases were evaluated via flow cytometry. Additionally, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition assay was performed. The results presented in the current study indicate that the six tested compounds exhibited cytotoxicity against both cancer cell lines, and the lowest IC50 was achieved with compound HB5 against Hep G2 cancer cells which was found to be highly selective against cancer cells. HB5-treated Hep G2 cells were arrested at the S and G2/M cell cycle phases. Compound HB5 caused cell killing via apoptosis rather than necrosis, and this was achieved by inhibiting EGFR tyrosine kinase activity needed for cell proliferation, and cell cycle progression. In silico pre-ADMET studies confirmed all final compounds don’t cause CNS side effects, with little liver dysfunction effect.