Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitor-induced Antiglomerular Basement Membrane Antibody Disease in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Figure 1

The Immunobiological Agents for Treatment of Antiglomerular Basement Membrane Disease

Combination therapy with glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, and plasmapheresis is recommended as the standard treatment for anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease, but the prognosis of this disease remains poor. Several immunobiological agents have been administered or are expected to be useful for anti-GBM disease in light of refractory disease or the standard treatments' tolerability. Many data regarding the use of biologic agents for anti-GBM disease have accumulated, verifying the effectiveness and potential of biologic agents as a new treatment option for anti-GBM disease. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were shown to be useful in animal studies, but these agents have no clinical use and were even shown to induce anti-GBM disease in several cases. Although the efficacy of the TNF-receptor antagonist has been observed in animal models, there are no published case reports of its clinical use. There are also no published reports of animal or clinical studies of anti-B-cell-activating factor, which is a member of the TNF family of agents. Anti-interleukin (IL)-6 antibodies have been demonstrated to have no effect on or to exacerbate nephritis in animal models. Anti-C5 inhibitor was observed to be useful in a few anti-GBM disease cases. Among the several immunobiological agents, only rituximab has been demonstrated to be useful in refractory or poor-tolerance patients or small uncontrolled studies. Rituximab is usually used in combination with steroids and plasma exchange and is used primarily as an alternative to cyclophosphamide, but there is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of rituximab for anti-GBM disease, and thus, randomized controlled studies are required.

Therapeutics in rheumatology and the kidney

The field of rheumatology has advanced significantly in recent years to provide rheumatologists with an extensive array of medications to combat rheumatic joint conditions. In contrast to an older era, when NSAIDs and other nephrotoxic agents were the mainstay of treatment, modern DMARDs vary considerably in their nephrotoxic potential and their use is not always precluded in populations with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD). This review will explore in detail the safety and efficacy profiles of medications used to treat rheumatologic disease, specifically in the setting of CKD. Specifically, we discuss both traditional agents used, i.e. NSAIDs, CSs and conventional synthetic DMARDs, as well as novel biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Anti-gout prescribing in CKD is also reviewed. We aim to provide practical guidance to rheumatologists, nephrologists and general physicians when prescribing these medications in the setting of CKD.

Tocilizumab-induced remission of nephrotic syndrome accompanied by secondary amyloidosis and glomerulonephritis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune-mediated systemic disorder that primarily affects the musculoskeletal system. Patients with RA often present with kidney diseases, such as nephrotic syndrome. Causes of nephrotic syndrome include membranous nephropathy, IgA nephropathy and secondary amyloidosis. Recently, biological agents, including anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha and anti-interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor antibodies, have been used for the treatment of RA. Anti-IL-6 receptor antibody therapy is believed to ameliorate RA-related kidney diseases, as IL-6 plays a central role in the pathogenesis of RA. We, herein, present the case of a patient with RA and related nephrotic syndrome whose proteinuria completely disappeared 1 month after tocilizumab treatment. A light microscopic examination of the pretreatment kidney biopsy specimen showed active glomerulonephritis with fibrocellular crescents and the deposition of amorphous substances stained weakly with hematoxylin-eosin and strongly with the Dylon method. Electron microscopy revealed the accumulation of microtubules ranging from 10 to 20 μm in width, primarily in the mesangial lesion. Amyloid A (AA) protein was positively stained in the mesangial area and vascular wall on immunohistochemistry. The final histologic diagnosis was RA-related glomerulonephritis and secondary AA amyloidosis. This case indicates that biological treatment targeting IL-6 is a promising therapeutic option for the treatment of kidney diseases associated with RA.

Biologics-induced autoimmune renal disorders in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: systematic literature review and analysis of a monocentric cohort

The use of biologic drugs has been linked with the paradoxical development of systemic and organ specific autoimmune processes. The aim of this study was to describe the features of biologics-induced autoimmune renal disorders (AIRD) through a systematic review and a cohort study of 707 adult patients affected with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (SA) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). The literature search identified 2687 articles of which 21 were considered relevant for the present study, accounting for 26 case reports. The cohort analysis retrieved 3 cases. According to clinical manifestations and kidney histology the identified AIRD cases were classified as: a) glomerulonephritis associated with systemic vasculitis (GNSV), b) glomerulonephritis in lupus-like syndrome (GNLS), c) isolated autoimmune renal disorders (IARD). Twenty-two out of 29 cases with AIRD were reported in patients affected by RA, 5 in AS and 2 in PsA. The biologic drug most frequently associated with development of AIRD was Etanercept (15 cases, 51.7%), followed by Adalimumab (9 cases, 31.0%) and Infliximab (3 cases, 10.3%) while Tocilizumab and Abatacept were reported in 1 case (3.4%) for each. Thirteen out of 29 (44.8%) cases were classified as affected by IARD, 12 (41.3%) as GNSV and 4 (13.9%) as GNLS. Worse prognosis was associated with GNSV and lack of biologic withdrawal. Although rare, AIRD may be life-threatening and may lead to renal failure and death. If AIRD occurs, biologic drugs must be stopped and patient should be treated according to clinical manifestations and kidney biopsy findings.