The COVID-19 Vaccine Landscape: What a Rheumatologist Needs to Know

COVID-19 mRNA vaccine immunogenicity decay and breakthrough illness in adolescents and young adults with childhood-onset rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the humoral immunogenicity for 6 months after the two-dose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with childhood-onset rheumatic diseases (cRDs).

METHODS

This monocentric observational study was conducted between August 2020 and March 2022. Humoral immunogenicity was assessed at 2-3 weeks after first vaccine dose and 1, 3 and 6 months after the second dose by the cPass™ severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralization antibody (nAb) assay. An inhibition signal of ≥30% defined the seroconversion threshold and the readings were calibrated against the World Health Organization International Standard for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

RESULTS. ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY-NINE

AYAs with cRDs were recruited [median age 16.8 years (interquartile range, IQR 14.7-19.5), 52% female, 72% Chinese]. JIA (58%) and SLE (18%) comprised the major diagnoses. After second vaccine dose, 99% seroconverted with a median nAb titre of 1779.8 IU/ml (IQR 882.8-2541.9), declining to 935.6 IU/ml (IQR 261.0-1514.9) and 683.2 IU/ml (IQR 163.5-1400.5) at the 3- and 6-month timepoints, respectively. The diagnosis of JIA [odds ratio (OR) 10.1, 95% CI 1.8-58.4, P = 0.010] and treatment with anti-TNF-α (aTNF) (OR 10.1, 95% CI 1.5-70.0, P = 0.019) were independently associated with a >50% drop of nAb titres at 6 months. Withholding MTX or MMF did not affect the vaccine response or decay rate. The COVID-19 breakthrough infection was estimated at 18.2 cases/1000 patient-months with no clinical risk factors identified.

CONCLUSION

Over half of AYAs with cRDs had a significant drop in SARS-CoV-2 nAb at 6-month despite an initial robust humoral response. JIA and aTNF usage are predictors of a faster decay rate.

Safety and reported adverse effects of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in patients with rheumatic diseases

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Symptoms and severity of COVID19 are variable.

Aim of the work

To evaluate the effectiveness and to identify side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines among Egyptian patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (RDs).

Patients and methods

The study included 126 patients with various RDs and 200 control. Detailed medical history was recorded with special concern regarding COVID-19 vaccination, types, doses, side effects, post-vaccination infection and treatment.

Results

In patients, BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) was the most frequent vaccine 42.3 % (n = 52); CoronaVac (Sinovac) 22 % (n = 27); ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca) 17.9 % (n = 22); BNT162 (Pfizer BioNTech) 14.6 % (n = 18); Sputnik V 1.6 % (n = 2) and Ad26.COV2-S (Johnson & Johnson) 1.6 % (n = 2). Regarding the control, 34.4 % (n = 62) received AstraZeneca; 26.1 % (n = 47) Sinopharm; 16.7 % (n = 30) Pfizer; 11.7 % (n = 21) Sinovac; 6.7 % (n = 12) Sputnik; 3.3 % (n = 6) Johnson & Johnson and 1.2 % (n = 2) mRNA1273 (Moderna). COVID-19 infection decreased after vaccination from 32 (25.4 %) to 7 (5.6 %), and from 162 (81.0 %) to 85 (42.7 %) in RD patients and the control respectively. ICU admission decreased from (6.3 %) among RD patients and from (1.3 %) in control to 0 % after vaccination in both groups. In RD patients, body ache was the commonest reported vaccine adverse effect (44.4 %). Pain at the injection site was the commonest among control (77 %). ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca) had the highest incidence of side effects, mRNA1273 (Moderna) showed the lowest.

Conclusion

COVID-19 vaccine was effective in decreasing infection and disease severity in RDs patients and control, with similar, mild adverse effects.

BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and booster in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a national cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Emerging evidence supports the immunogenic response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD). However, large-scale data about the association between vaccination, and COVID-19 outcomes in patients with ARD is limited.

METHODS

We used data from Clalit Health Services, which covers more than half of the population in Israel. Patients with ARD older than 18 were included between 20 December 2020 and 30 September 2021, when the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, and later a third booster dose, were available. The primary outcome was a documented positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. We used a Cox regression models with vaccination status as time-dependent covariate and calculated the HR for the study outcome.

RESULTS

We included 127 928 patients with ARD, of whom, by the end of the study follow-up, there were 27 350 (21.3%) unvaccinated patients, 31 407 (24.5%) vaccinated patients and 69 171 (54.1%) patients who also received a third booster-dose. We identified 8470 (6.6%) patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test during the study period. The HR for SARS-CoV-2 infection among the vaccination group was 0.143 (0.095 to 0.214, p<0.001), and among the booster group was 0.017 (0.009 to 0.035, p<0.001). Similar results were found regardless of the type of ARD group or antirheumatic therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that both the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and the booster are associated with better COVID-19 outcomes in patients with ARD.

A systematic review on mucocutaneous presentations after COVID-19 vaccination and expert recommendations about vaccination of important immune-mediated dermatologic disorders

With dermatologic side effects being fairly prevalent following vaccination against COVID-19, and the multitude of studies aiming to report and analyze these adverse events, the need for an extensive investigation on previous studies seemed urgent, in order to provide a thorough body of information about these post-COVID-19 immunization mucocutaneous reactions. To achieve this goal, a comprehensive electronic search was performed through the international databases including Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane, Web of science, and Google scholar on July 12, 2021, and all articles regarding mucocutaneous manifestations and considerations after COVID-19 vaccine administration were retrieved using the following keywords: COVID-19 vaccine, dermatology considerations and mucocutaneous manifestations. A total of 917 records were retrieved and a final number of 180 articles were included in data extraction. Mild, moderate, severe and potentially life-threatening adverse events have been reported following immunization with COVID vaccines, through case reports, case series, observational studies, randomized clinical trials, and further recommendations and consensus position papers regarding vaccination. In this systematic review, we categorized these results in detail into five elaborate tables, making what we believe to be an extensively informative, unprecedented set of data on this topic. Based on our findings, in the viewpoint of the pros and cons of vaccination, mucocutaneous adverse events were mostly non-significant, self-limiting reactions, and for the more uncommon moderate to severe reactions, guidelines and consensus position papers could be of great importance to provide those at higher risks and those with specific worries of flare-ups or inefficient immunization, with sufficient recommendations to safely schedule their vaccine doses, or avoid vaccination if they have the discussed contra-indications.