Effect of renin-angiotensin-system blockers on contrast-medium-induced acute kidney injury after coronary angiography

THE RISK OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY AFTER ELECTIVE VERSUS EMERGENCY CORONARY INTERVENTION

OBJECTIVE

The aim: A serious and common complication after percutaneous coronary intervention is acute kidney injury, which is associated with an increased risk of renal, cardiovascular and even mortality; therefore, early prognosis and identification of patients at higher risk are essential for early initiation of preventive measures. The aim of this study is to predict and compare the risk for the development of CI-AKI in patient with ACS who undergo emergency PCI or elective (i.e. after medical stabilization) PCI by utilizing the sensitivity of serum NGAL as an early and reliable predictor for CI-AK.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: The study include 37 patients with acute coronary syndrome, baseline serum creatinine, complete blood count and pre and two hours post operative serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin were measured and all patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention according to the standard protocol used in Al Najaf Cardiac Center.

RESULTS

Results: This is a Two-Arm study that included a total of 37 patients with acute coronary syndrome aged 38-83 years. Eighteen of them had emergency percutaneous coronary intervention while the remaining 19 had elective percutaneous coronary intervention (after medical stabilization). Elevation of serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin level two hours after percutaneous coronary intervention was found to be significantly higher among emergency percutaneous coronary intervention group compared to elective group.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Acute coronary syndrome patients are undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention are at an increasing risk for the development of contrast induced acute kidney injury than those undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Angiography and Intervention

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury has multiple definitions, but is generally described as worsening renal function after administration of iodinated contrast media. It is associated with high in-hospital mortality and poor long-term survival. Furthermore, patients undergoing coronary angiography commonly have comorbidities such as hypertension or congestive heart failure, which are often treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Trials assessing the effects of these renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents on the subsequent development of contrast-associated acute kidney injury have shown conflicting data, suggesting both beneficial and harmful effects. Therefore, there are no clear guidelines on whether clinicians should discontinue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents peri-procedurally. In this article, we review the data from trials assessing the effects of peri-procedural renin-angiotensin system-blocking agent use in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral angiography and intervention. Future studies will likely focus on the extent of damage or potential benefit of these agents on renal function, cardiac function, as well as morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend discontinuation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors prior to coronary angiography.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade is associated with higher risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with diabetes

As the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular comorbidities continues to rise, driven by increased prevalence of obesity and an aging population, so does the demand for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to restore cardiac blood flow. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are commonly prescribed to hypertensive diabetic patients to prevent diabetic nephropathy. However, evidence suggests that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may increase the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) following coronary angiography (CAG) and PCI. We therefore conducted a retrospective, multicenter study applying the propensity score matching method to evaluate the impact of RAAS inhibition on CIAKI in diabetic patients undergoing CAG/PCI. Among 2240 subjects that met the inclusion criteria, 704 patients in the ACEIs/ARBs group were successfully matched to eligible control patients. The incidence of CIAKI (serum creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dl or ≥25% from baseline within 72 h post-CAG/PCI) was significantly higher in the ACEIs/ARBs group than in the control group (26.6% vs. 16.2%, P<0.001). However, control patients showed increased risk of overall adverse cardiovascular events (4.1% vs. 1.8% for ACEIs/ARBs; P=0.016). These data indicate that RAAS inhibition increases the risk of CIAKI in diabetic patients, but confers protection against early cardiovascular events.

Effectiveness of contrast-associated acute kidney injury prevention methods; a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different methods to prevent contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) have been proposed in recent years. We performed a mixed treatment comparison to evaluate and rank suggested interventions.

METHODS

A comprehensive Systematic review and a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was completed. Results were tabulated and graphically represented using a network diagram; forest plots and league tables were shown to rank treatments by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A stacked bar chart rankogram was generated. We performed main analysis with 200 RCTs and three analyses according to contrast media and high or normal baseline renal profile that includes 173, 112 & 60 RCTs respectively.

RESULTS

We have included 200 trials with 42,273 patients and 44 interventions. The primary outcome was CI-AKI, defined as ≥25% relative increase or ≥ 0.5 mg/dl increase from baseline creatinine one to 5 days post contrast exposure. The top ranked interventions through different analyses were Allopurinol, Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) & Oxygen (0.9647, 0.7809 & 0.7527 in the main analysis). Comparatively, reference treatment intravenous hydration was ranked lower but better than Placebo (0.3124 VS 0.2694 in the main analysis).

CONCLUSION

Multiple CA-AKI preventive interventions have been tested in RCTs. This network evaluates data for all the explored options. The results suggest that some options (particularly allopurinol, PGE1 & Oxygen) deserve further evaluation in a larger well-designed RCTs.

Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and presepsin for infectious disease in patients with acute kidney injury

Procalcitonin (PCT) and presepsin (PSEP) are sepsis markers, but their diagnostic accuracy may be compromised in acute kidney injury (AKI). We evaluated their diagnostic accuracy in patients with/without AKI. This retrospective study comprised 91 patients with at least one criterion of systematic inflammatory response syndrome. AKI markers plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), plasma cystatin C (CysC), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured upon hospital admission and on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Patients were divided into non-AKI and AKI groups. APACHE II severity scores were determined. PCT and PSEP levels were increased significantly in non-AKI and AKI patients with infection. NGAL, CysC, and eGFR in patients with infection were associated with PCT, PSEP, and APACHE II score, and levels of PCT and PSEP were correlated significantly with disease severity. PCT and PSEP are useful markers of bacterial infections in AKI but different thresholds should be applied.

Risk prediction models for contrast induced nephropathy: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To look at the available literature on validated prediction models for contrast induced nephropathy and describe their characteristics.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, and CINAHL (cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature) databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Databases searched from inception to 2015, and the retrieved reference lists hand searched. Dual reviews were conducted to identify studies published in the English language of prediction models tested with patients that included derivation and validation cohorts. Data were extracted on baseline patient characteristics, procedural characteristics, modelling methods, metrics of model performance, risk of bias, and clinical usefulness. Eligible studies evaluated characteristics of predictive models that identified patients at risk of contrast induced nephropathy among adults undergoing a diagnostic or interventional procedure using conventional radiocontrast media (media used for computed tomography or angiography, and not gadolinium based contrast).

RESULTS

16 studies were identified, describing 12 prediction models. Substantial interstudy heterogeneity was identified, as a result of different clinical settings, cointerventions, and the timing of creatinine measurement to define contrast induced nephropathy. Ten models were validated internally and six were validated externally. Discrimination varied in studies that were validated internally (C statistic 0.61-0.95) and externally (0.57-0.86). Only one study presented reclassification indices. The majority of higher performing models included measures of pre-existing chronic kidney disease, age, diabetes, heart failure or impaired ejection fraction, and hypotension or shock. No prediction model evaluated its effect on clinical decision making or patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most predictive models for contrast induced nephropathy in clinical use have modest ability, and are only relevant to patients receiving contrast for coronary angiography. Further research is needed to develop models that can better inform patient centred decision making, as well as improve the use of prevention strategies for contrast induced nephropathy.

Prognostic value of early acute kidney injury after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

The pattern and prognostic impact of "early" acute kidney injury (AKI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction have not been well established. From November 2005 to November 2011, 971 post-myocardial infarction patients who underwent primary PCI were analyzed. Early AKI was defined using absolute change in serum creatinine (SCr; SCr <24 hours after primary PCI minus admission SCr) as follows: no early AKI (SCr change <0.3 mg/dl), mild early AKI (SCr change 0.3 to <0.5 mg/dl), moderate early AKI (SCr change 0.5 to <1.0 mg/dl), and severe early AKI (SCr change ≥1.0 mg/dl). One-year major adverse cardiac events were defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularizations. Overall, 9.6% had early AKI, including 5.7% with mild, 2.5% with moderate, and 1.4% with severe early AKI. Diabetes mellitus (odds ratio 1.84, p = 0.042), the left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio 0.97, p = 0.042), and hemoglobin levels (odds ratio 0.84, p = 0.039) were independently associated with early AKI. Early AKI (adjusted hazard ratio 2.80, p = 0.005) was an independent predictor of 1-year major adverse cardiac events. The adjusted hazard ratios of 1-year major adverse cardiac events from the lowest (reference) to the highest quartile of early AKI were as follows: 1, 2.87 (p = 0.012), 3.22 (p = 0.021), and 5.83 (p = 0.004), respectively. In conclusion, early dynamic change in renal function after primary PCI can sensitively predict worse outcomes.