Clinical analysis of 117 cases with synchronous multiple primary esophageal squamous cell carcinomas

Comparison of the Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Intramural Metastases and Multiple Primary Carcinomas

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to distinguish esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with intramural metastases (IM) from multiple primary oesophageal carcinoma (MPEC). Nevertheless, there are significant differences in their prognoses and treatments. Therefore, our study aims to clarify the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of these two entities and to provide clues for differential diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 6304 patients who underwent esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. The clinicopathological and prognostic features of patients with IM and MPEC were evaluated. P53 and Rb1 were detected by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining using a tissue microarray.

RESULTS

Among the 6304 patients, 127 (2.0%) had IM, and 138 (2.2%) had MPEC. Patients with IM were more likely to have an advanced pT (p < 0.001), pN (p < 0.001), more lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001) and neural invasion (p < 0.001). Additionally, patients with IM had an extremely poor prognosis compared to those with MPEC, with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 18.9% and 56.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, IM was found to be an independent poor prognostic indicator for OS and DFS. In the IM group, all patients showed consistent p53 expression in both primary and IM foci. Of note, Rb1 loss was found in 3 pairs of primary foci and metastases, along with p53 nonsense mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IM had more risk factors and extremely worse prognosis than those with MPEC. It is essential to discriminate IM from MPEC when managing multifocal carcinomas. IHC staining of p53 and Rb1 may aid in differential diagnosis.

Molecular characteristics of multifocal esophageal squamous cell carcinomas to discriminate multicentric origin from intramural metastasis

Multifocal esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) can be diagnosed as of multicentric origin (MO) or intramural metastasis (IMM). We aimed here to accurately discriminate MO from IMM and explore the tumor immune microenvironment of multifocal ESCCs. Multifocal ESCCs were identified in 333 ESCC patients, and in 145 patients discrimination between MO and IMM was not possible by histopathological examination. Of the 145 patients, tissues of 14 were analyzed by whole-exome sequencing (WES) of 71 different tumor regions, and MO, IMM, and MO/IMM mixed groups were identified in three, ten, and one cases, respectively, based on the similarity of genomic architecture between or among different tumors from one patient. Further phylogenetic analyses revealed complex clonal evolution patterns in IMM cases, and tumor cells disseminated from the primary tumors to IMM tumors were independent of lymph node metastasis. The NanoString-based assay showed that immune cell infiltrates were significantly enriched, and that the immune and proliferation pathways were more activated, in large tumors than in small ones in MO but not IMM cases. Similarly, PD-L1 expression and the density of paratumoral CD8⁺ T cells were higher in large tumors than in small tumors in MO. Taken together, through analysis of the genomic and immune landscapes, our study has comprehensively characterized the heterogeneity and clonal relationship of multifocal ESCCs, which may be helpful in distinguishing MO from IMM, and for interpreting the immunotherapy responses for multifocal ESCC patients. © 2022 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Comparison of clinicopathological features and prognostic significance between synchronous multiple primary and solitary esophageal squamous cell carcinomas

Background

Synchronous multiple primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (S-MPESCC) refers to more than one primary esophageal carcinoma detected in a solitary patient at the time of initial presentation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological features, appropriate surgical approaches and long-term survival in patients with S-MPESCC by comparing with those with solitary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC).

Methods

In total, 567 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma surgically resected in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from January 2012 to December 2018 were screened for retrospective analysis (50 in the S-MPESCC group and 516 in the SESCC group).

Results

No significant difference was observed in terms of other characteristics except total alcohol consumption (P = 0.029). S-MPESCC had higher lymph node rate than SESCC (62.0% and 44.1%, respectively; P = 0.015) especially in upper mediastinal (32.0% and 18.6%, respectively; P = 0.023) and abdominal (38.0% and 22.8%, respectively; P = 0.017) regions. The survival was not different between the two groups, and the 5-year survival rates of S-MPESCC and SESCC were 46.2% and 50.8%, respectively (P = 0.507). But for patients with pT3-4 cancers, the survival in S-MPESCC was worse than that in SESCC (P = 0.033). In the multivariate analysis, pT stage of primary cancer was an important independent predictor of prognosis in patients with S-MPESCC (hazard ratio [HR], 3.968; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.031 to 15.268; P = 0.045).

Conclusions

S-MPESCC was significantly different from SESCC in terms of clinicopathological characteristics include alcohol intake and pattern of lymphatic metastasis. Furthermore, S-MPESCC showed worse long-term survival than SESCC with increasing depth of primary cancer infiltration.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10283-2.