QuantiFERON-TB Gold PLUS versus QuantiFERON- TB Gold In-Tube test for diagnosing tuberculosis infection

Integrating pathogen- and host-derived blood biomarkers for enhanced tuberculosis diagnosis: a comprehensive review

This review explores the evolving landscape of blood biomarkers in the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), focusing on biomarkers derived both from the pathogen and the host. These biomarkers provide critical insights that can improve diagnostic accuracy and timeliness, essential for effective TB management. The document highlights recent advancements in molecular techniques that have enhanced the detection and characterization of specific biomarkers. It also discusses the integration of these biomarkers into clinical practice, emphasizing their potential to revolutionize TB diagnostics by enabling more precise detection and monitoring of the disease progression. Challenges such as variability in biomarker expression and the need for standardized validation processes are addressed to ensure reliability across different populations and settings. The review calls for further research to refine these biomarkers and fully harness their potential in the fight against TB, suggesting a multidisciplinary approach to overcome existing barriers and optimize diagnostic strategies. This comprehensive analysis underscores the significance of blood biomarkers as invaluable tools in the global effort to control and eliminate TB.

Prevalence of indeterminate tuberculosis interferon-gamma release assays in COVID-19 patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aims

The reliability of interferon-gamma-release-assays (IGRAs) for tuberculosis (TB) testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is unknown. This study aimed to systematically review the prevalence of indeterminate TB-IGRA following SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination and to review associated factors.

Methods

This systematic literature review was guided according to the PRISMA guidelines by searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Clinicalkey, and Cochrane Library. Studies reporting results of TB-IGRA tests (QuantiFERON [QFT]-TB, T-SPOT.TB) in COVID-19 patients or vaccines were included. The random effects model was used to assess the prevalence of indeterminate IGRA results. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Τ 2 and 95% predictive interval.

Results

Of the 273 citations screened, 12 articles were included in the final analysis including a total of 2107 patients. The overall pooled effect size proportion of indeterminate QFT-TB results, estimated in eight studies using the QFT-TB Plus assay, was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.205-0.324, Τ 2 = 0.158). The mean true effect size was 0.26 (95% predictive interval: [0.110-0.500]). A subgroup analysis was not undertaken due to the small number of studies. Indeterminate QFT-TB rates were associated with COVID-19 severity, steroid treatment, inflammation-related parameters, neutrophilia, and lymphopenia.

Conclusion

Indeterminate QFT-TB results in COVID-19 patients occur in almost one-quarter of tests performed. Further studies are needed to assess associated factors.

Comparison of interferon-gamma production between TB1 and TB2 tubes of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

CD8 T-cells play an important role in interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production as a host defense against tuberculosis (TB) infection. Therefore, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) was developed by adding a TB2 tube beside the TB1 tube. This study aimed to compare and analyze the difference in IFN-γ production between the two tubes in general and specific populations.

CONTENT

PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO were searched for studies reporting IFN-γ production levels in the TB1 and TB2 tubes. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

SUMMARY

A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The IFN-γ production in the TB2 tube was statistically higher than that in the TB1 tube (mean difference (MD)=0.02, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): 0.01-0.03). Further subgroup analysis in specific populations revealed that the MD of IFN-γ production between the TB2 and TB1 tubes was significantly higher in active TB subjects than in latent TB infection (LTBI) subjects (MD=1.13, 95 % CI: 0.49-1.77, and MD=0.30, 95 % CI: 0.00-0.60, respectively). A similar finding was found in immune-mediated inflammatory disease subjects, but not statistically significant. Interestingly, IFN-γ production capacity was lower in active TB subjects than in LTBI subjects in each of the TB1 and TB2 tubes.

OUTLOOK

This study is the first to systematically compare IFN-γ production between the TB1 and TB2 tubes. The IFN-γ production was higher in the TB2 tube than in the TB1 tube, representing the host's CD8 T-cell response magnitude to TB infection.

Assessing the Diagnostic Performance of New Commercial Interferon-γ Release Assays for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We compared 6 new interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs; hereafter index tests: QFT-Plus, QFT-Plus CLIA, QIAreach, Wantai TB-IGRA, Standard E TB-Feron, and T-SPOT.TB/T-Cell Select) with World Health Organization (WHO)-endorsed tests for tuberculosis infection (hereafter reference tests).

METHODS

Data sources (1 January 2007-18 August 2021) were Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and manufacturers' data. Cross-sectional and cohort studies comparing the diagnostic performance of index and reference tests were selected. The primary outcomes of interest were the pooled differences in sensitivity and specificity between index and reference tests. The certainty of evidence (CoE) was summarized using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven studies were included (44 evaluated the QFT-Plus, 4 QFT-Plus CLIA, 3 QIAreach, 26 TB-IGRA, 10 TB-Feron [1 assessing the QFT-Plus], and 1 T-SPOT.TB/T-Cell Select). Compared to the QFT-GIT, QFT Plus's sensitivity was 0.1 percentage points lower (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.8 to 2.6; CoE: moderate), and its specificity 0.9 percentage points lower (95% CI, -1.0 to -.9; CoE: moderate). Compared to QFT-GIT, TB-IGRA's sensitivity was 3.0 percentage points higher (95% CI, -.2 to 6.2; CoE: very low), and its specificity 2.6 percentage points lower (95% CI, -4.2 to -1.0; CoE: low). Agreement between the QFT-Plus CLIA and QIAreach with QFT-Plus was excellent (pooled κ statistics of 0.86 [95% CI, .78 to .94; CoE: low]; and 0.96 [95% CI, .92 to 1.00; CoE: low], respectively). The pooled κ statistic comparing the TB-Feron and the QFT-Plus or QFT-GIT was 0.85 (95% CI, .79 to .92; CoE: low).

CONCLUSIONS

The QFT-Plus and the TB-IGRA have very similar sensitivity and specificity as WHO-approved IGRAs.

Management of Tuberculosis Infection: Current Situation, Recent Developments and Operational Challenges

Tuberculosis infection (TBI) is defined as a state of infection in which individuals host live Mycobacterium tuberculosis with or without clinical signs of active TB. It is now understood as a dynamic process covering a spectrum of responses to infection resulting from the interaction between the TB bacilli and the host immune system. The global burden of TBI is about one-quarter of the world’s population, representing a reservoir of approximately 2 billion people. On average, 5–10% of people who are infected will develop TB disease over the course of their lives, but this risk is enhanced in a series of conditions, such as co-infection with HIV. The End-TB strategy promotes the programmatic management of TBI as a crucial endeavor to achieving global targets to end the TB epidemic. The current development of new diagnostic tests capable of discriminating between simple TBI and active TB, combined with novel short-course preventive treatments, will help achieve this goal. In this paper, we present the current situation and recent developments of management of TBI and the operational challenges.

The cascade of care in testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in liver transplant candidates

BACKGROUND

Testing and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) can mitigate risk of active tuberculosis (TB) post-liver transplant (LT). Testing and treatment completion rates have been reported low in this population. Our study aims to quantify the proportion of LT candidates who completed LTBI care cascade in our center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on LT candidates from 2012 to 2021. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who completed each cascade stage. Secondary outcome was an analysis of factors associated with positive and indeterminate LTBI testing.

RESULTS

Of the 273 LT candidates, 265 (97.1%) were referred to transplant infectious disease (TID), 264 (96.7%) had orders for interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), 262 (96%) underwent TID evaluation, and 259 (94.9%) completed IGRA. Twenty had LTBI, and 18 were treatment naïve and recommended for treatment. Of the 18, 15 (83.3%) agreed to therapy, 14 (77.8%) initiated treatment, and 12 (66.7%) completed treatment. No posttransplant TB reactivation occurred. Patients born in Asia, previous incarceration, past military service, and granuloma findings on chest imaging were likely to have positive IGRA (p < .05). Older age and travel to TB-endemic countries were likely to have indeterminate IGRA (p < .05). Indeterminate IGRAs were more common in QuantiFERON (QTF)-Gold Plus TB (15.3%) versus QTF-Gold TB (9.3%, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of LTBI testing and treatment initiation and completion can be attributed to a standardized process that includes TID evaluation. Future studies in larger cohort are needed to better understand factors that can optimize the completion rates of LTBI treatment in LT candidates.

Comparing the diagnostic performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB and TST: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is an important test that has emerged in recent years for detecting TB infection. We conducted a review to compare the sensitivity, specificity and positive rate of QFT-Plus with that of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT), T-cell spot of tuberculosis assay (T-SPOT.TB) and Tuberculin test (TST).

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched, without language restrictions, from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2022 using "Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections" and "QuantiFERON-TB-Plus" as search phrases. We estimated the sensitivity from studies of patients with active tuberculosis, specificity from studies of populations with very low risk of TB exposure, and positive rate from studies of high-risk populations. The methodological quality of the eligible studies was assessed, and a random-effects model meta-analysis was used to determine the risk difference (RD). We assessed the pooled rate by using a random-effects model. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42021267432).

RESULTS

Of 3996 studies, 83 were eligible for full-text screening and 41 were included in the meta-analysis. In patients with active TB, the sensitivity of QFT-Plus was compared to that of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB, respectively, and no statistically differences were found. In populations with a very low risk of TB exposure, the specificity of QFT-Plus was compared with that of QFT-GTI and T-SPOT.TB, respectively, and no statistically differences were found. Two studies were eligible to compare the specificity of the QFT-Plus test with that of the TST test, and the pooled RD was 0.12 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.22). In high-risk populations, 18 studies were eligible to compare the positive rate of the QFT-Plus test with that of the QFT-GIT test, and the pooled RD was 0.02 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.03). The positive rate of QFT-Plus was compared with that of T-SPOT.TB and TST groups, and no statistically differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of QFT-Plus was similar to that of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB, but was slightly more specific than TST.

Are interferon-gamma release assays reliable to detect tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with Janus kinase inhibitors?

Background

Screening for latent tuberculosis infection is recommended in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starting Janus kinase inhibitors (Jaki). Interferon (IFN)-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are increasingly used for this purpose. Jaki tend to decrease the levels of IFNs, questioning the reliability of IGRAs during treatment with these drugs.

Objectives

To compare the performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-P) and QFT Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT) in RA patients treated with Jaki.

Methods

RA patients underwent QFT-P and QFT-GIT at baseline (T0), and after 3 (T3) and 12 months (T12) of treatment with Jaki. The agreement between the two tests was calculated. The agreement between IGRAs and tuberculin skin test (TST) or chest radiography at baseline was also determined. The variability of QTF-P results was longitudinally assessed.

Results

Twenty-nine RA patients (F/M 23/6; median age/IQR 63/15.5 years; median disease duration/IQR 174/216 months) were enrolled. A perfect agreement was found between QFT-P and QFT-GIT at all times (κ = 1). At T0, no agreement was recorded between IGRAs and TST (κ = -0.08) and between TST and chest radiography (κ = -0.07), a low agreement was found between QFT-P and chest radiography (κ = 0.17). A variation of 33.3% in the results of QFT-P was recorded at T3 vs T0, of 29.4% at T12 vs T0, and of 11.8% at T12 vs T3. The median levels of IFN-γ produced by lymphocytes in response to the mitogen of QFT-P decreased after 3 months followed by an increase after 12 months (not significant). No change in the median number of circulating lymphocytes was documented. Glucocorticoids intake was associated with a higher probability of negative or indeterminate IGRA results at T0 (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

A response to IGRAs is detectable during treatment with Jaki. However, fluctuations in the results of IGRAs have been observed in the absence of correlation with clinical outcomes, thus challenging their interpretation.

Evaluation of tuberculosis diagnostic biomarkers in immunocompromised hosts based on cytokine levels in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a serious health concern globally. QuantiFERON-TB (QFT) is a diagnostic tool for TB detection, and its sensitivity is reduced in immunocompromised hosts with low T lymphocyte counts or abnormal T cell function. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between T cell and cytokine levels in patients with active TB using QFT-Plus. Forty-five patients with active TB were enrolled, and the cytokines in QFT-Plus tube supernatants were quantified using the MAGPIX System. CD4⁺ T cell count negatively correlated with patient age (p < 0.001, r = -0.51). The levels of TB1-responsive interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) and IL-2 correlated with CD4⁺ T cell count, whereas the levels of TB2-responsive IL-1Ra and IFN-γ-induced protein 10 correlated with both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell counts. Cytokines that correlated with CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell counts might not be suitable TB diagnostic biomarkers in immunocompromised hosts. Notably, cytokines that did not correlate with the T cell counts, such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, might be candidate biomarkers for TB in immunocompromised hosts. Our findings might help improve TB diagnosis, which could enable prompt treatment and minimize poor disease outcomes.

Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and QuantiFERON-TB Gold-Plus in the Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections in Immunocompromised Patients: a Real-World Study

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is an emerging QuantiFERON test after QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) for tuberculosis infection detection; it is an IFN-γ release assay. We compared QFTPlus, which has an additional TB antigen 2 (TB2) tube to induce cell-mediated (CD8⁺ T cell) immune responses, with QFT-GIT. We conducted this study to assess the agreement of the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays in immunocompromised patients in a clinical setting. A total of 278 immunocompromised patients and 175 immunocompetent patients from different departments were continuously enrolled from August 2020 to March 2021, and each patient underwent both tests. Correlations between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays showed good agreement (κ value = 0.859). Patients receiving long-term immunosuppressant therapy had the lowest concordance between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays; 9 out of 11 positive latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) cases were diagnosed by the QFT-Plus assay, implying that QFT-Plus may detect more LTBI than QFT-GIT does in these patients. Indeterminate results were associated with lower lymphocyte, CD4⁺ T cell, and CD8⁺ T cell absolute counts, and with lower CD4/CD8 ratios. In conclusion, we found that the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays had high agreement not only in immunocompetent patients but also in immunocompromised patients. QFT-Plus may detect more LTBI than QFT-GIT in patients receiving long-term immunosuppressant therapy. Thresholds were established for lymphocyte absolute counts of >1.15 × 10⁹ cells, and for CD4⁺ T cell absolute counts of >467.7 × 10⁶ to 478.5 × 10⁶ cells, which may lessen the incidence of indeterminate results.

IMPORTANCE This study evaluated the performance of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus in the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection in immunocompromised patients and found that QFT-Plus may detect more LTBI than QFT-GIT does in patients receiving long-term immunosuppressant therapy. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it highlights the different diagnostic accuracies of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus in different subpopulations of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. Selecting a test with better performance, particularly in patients with a high risk of developing active TB, may assist the health sector in better managing TB. Furthermore, we believe that this study will be of significance to the diagnosis of LTBI.

Elevated Rates of Indeterminate Results on QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus in COVID-19 Patients

Interferon gamma release assays are used to screen various patient populations for latent tuberculosis infection. In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, J. D. Ward, C. Cornaby, and J. L. Schmitz (J Clin Microbiol 59:e00811-21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00811-21) investigated an increased indeterminate rate in the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus assay among COVID-19 patients that was independent of immunosuppressive agents and lymphopenia. In their study, COVID-19 patients with indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus results trended toward decreased survival as well as increased serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10 levels, although the differences were not statistically significant. They suggest that this pattern of cytokine expression supports an impairment of Th1, specifically interferon gamma production, in critically ill COVID-19 patients, as indicated by indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus results. Clinicians should be aware of the increased rate of indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus results in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Evaluation of a lateral flow assay-based IFN-γ release assay as a point-of-care test for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection

INTRODUCTION

We compared the performance of a fluorescence lateral flow assay (ichroma™ IGRA-TB) with the QuantiFERON-TB Gold PLUS (QFT-PLUS) for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) prior to receiving biologics therapy.

METHOD

The comparability of the ichroma™ IGRA-TB assay with the QFT-PLUS assay for the diagnosis of LTBI was determined in prospectively enrolled patients with IMID prior to receiving biologics between August 2018 and October 2019. To determine the best cut-off value of the ichroma™ IGRA-TB, an ROC curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Patients with IMID (n = 145) had inflammatory bowel disease (n = 83; 57.2%), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 44; 30.3%), or spondyloarthropathy (n = 18; 12.4%). The median age was 40.5 (interquartile range: 27.0-56.0), 72 (49.7%) were men, and 140 (96.6%) received BCG vaccination. With the manufacturer-recommended cut-off values, 11 (7.6%) and 20 (13.8%) patients showed positive results with the ichroma™ IGRA-TB and QFT-PLUS tests, respectively. The overall agreement between the two tests was 91.0% with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.535 (95% confidence interval: 0.317-0.754). ROC curve analysis of the QFT-PLUS results showed that a cut-off value of > 0.21 IU/mL would improve the performance of the ichroma™ IGRA-TB. Using the new cut-off value, the concordance rate was improved to 93.1% with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.668 (95% confidence interval: 0.478-0.858).

CONCLUSIONS

The ichroma™ IGRA-TB could be used as a point-of-care test for LTBI screening in IMID patients before starting biologics, especially in resource-limited settings. Key Points • The ichroma™ IGRA-TB is an automated fluorescence lateral flow assay-based IGRA. • The test has advantages like short turn-around time, low-cost, and ease of use. • The ichroma™ IGRA-TB showed high agreement with the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube in patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases before starting biologics.

Evaluation of the performance of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold plus test in active tuberculosis patients

The aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and the possible factors affecting the sensitivity of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay in culture-positive active TB (Tuberculosis) patients, to investigate the possible causes of negative and indeterminate results in active TB patients, and to compare the QFT-Plus results of active TB patients and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) cases. The QFT-Plus assay was performed in 46 active TB patients and 64 LTBI. The sensitivity of the test was found as 79.5% in all culture-positive patients, 72.7% in the immunocompromised patients, and 86.4% in the non-immunocompromised patients. Compared to active TB, individuals with LTBI had a lower T-cell response and lower IFN-ɣ concentrations. It was determined that the immunocompromisation reduced the sensitivity of the test and the secreted IFN-ɣ concentrations and increased the indeterminate results in patients with active TB. There was no difference in secreted IFN-ɣ concentrations between M. tuberculosis clones, but higher IFN-ɣ concentrations in patients infected with M. tuberculosis strains compared to patients infected with zoonotic strains. Compared with active TB, response to “only to TB2” was significantly higher in LTBI. In conclusion, it was concluded that TB2 tube increased sensitivity in LTBI but may not contribute to sensitivity in active TB.

CD4 response of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus for positive consistency of latent tuberculosis infection in patients on dialysis

A significantly negative reversion in the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT) test is reported in patients on dialysis, which makes the results unreliable. The CD4 and CD8 responses of the QFT-Gold plus (QFT-Plus) may have better positive consistency, but this needs to be investigated. We enrolled dialysis patients with baseline positive QFT-GIT₀ results and conducted two rounds of follow-up paired QFT-GIT_1&2 and QFT-Plus_1&2 tests at an interval of 6 months. The positive consistency, concordance, and discordance of the QFT results were analyzed. A total of 236 patients on dialysis were screened, and 73 participants with positive QFT-GIT₀ results were enrolled. The baseline QFT-GIT₀ response was higher in the 1st QFT-Plus₁(+) group than in the QFT-Plus₁(-) group, but insignificantly different between the 1st QFT-GIT₁(+) and QFT-GIT₁(-) groups. The two assays had good correlation when concurrently tested. Fifty-three subjects completed a second round of the QFT-GIT₂ and QFT-Plus₂. Persistent positivity was higher with the QFT-Plus₂ (81.8%) than with the QFT-GIT₂ (58.8%, p = 0.040). The QFT-GIT₁ and QFT-Plus₁ CD4 responses were higher in patients with persistent positivity than in those with negative reversion, whereas the difference of the QFT-Plus TB1 and TB2 data, representative of the CD8 response, were similar between positive persistence and negative reversion. In conclusion, the QFT-Plus provides more reliable positive consistency than does the QFT-GIT. The CD4 interferon-γ response might play a role in maintaining positivity of LTBI.

Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus to Other Tests of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We conducted a review to compare the sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and predictive ability of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) with that of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT; QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and other latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) tests.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from January 2013 through May 2020. We included studies comparing QFT-Plus with at least one other LTBI test. We estimated sensitivity from studies of patients with active tuberculosis, and specificity from studies of healthy individuals with low risk of LTBI. Three independent reviewers evaluated eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias.

RESULTS

Compared with QFT-GIT, the sensitivity of QFT-Plus in patients with active TB was 1.3% higher (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.3% to 2.9%); in 2 studies of patients with very low probability of LTBI, the specificity was 0.9% lower (95% CI, -2.4% to 0.6%). These differences were not statistically significant. The agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT was high, with a pooled Cohen's kappa statistic of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88). The reproducibility of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus was similarly poor. All participants in the studies to estimate sensitivity were aged ≥15 years, and only 6 were people living with human immunodeficiency virus. We found no studies to assess predictive ability.

CONCLUSIONS

QFT-Plus has diagnostic performance that is very similar to that of QFT-GIT. Further studies are needed to assess the sensitivity of QFT-Plus in immunocompromised patients and younger children before concluding if this new version offers advantages.

The diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI): currently available tests, future developments, and perspectives to eliminate tuberculosis (TB)

INTRODUCTION

Despite great efforts, tuberculosis (TB) is still a major public health threat worldwide. For decades, TB control programs have focused almost exclusively on infectious TB active cases.  However, it is evident that this strategy alone cannot achieve TB elimination. To achieve this objective a comprehensive strategy directed toward integrated latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) management is needed. Recently it has been recognized that LTBI is not a stable condition but rather a spectrum of infections (e.g., intermittent, transient or progressive) which may lead to incipient, then subclinical, and finally active TB disease.

AIM

Provide an overview of current available LTBI diagnostic test including updates, future developments and perspectives.

RESULTS

There is currently no test for the direct identification of live MT infection in humans. The diagnosis of LTBI is indirect and relies on the detection of an immune response against MT antigens, assuming that the immune response has developed after a contact with the biological agent. Tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) are the main diagnostic tools for LTBI, however, both present strengths and limitations. The most ancient diagnostic test (TST) can be associated with several technical errors, has limited positive predictive value, is being influenced by BCG vaccination and several conditions can reduce the skin reactivity. Notwithstanding these limitations, prompt identification of TST conversion, should orientate indications for preventive therapy of LTBI. IGRAs have superior specificity, are not affected by M. bovis, BCG vaccination and other environmental mycobacteria. However, they present some logistical and organisational constraints and are more expensive. Currently, the WHO guidelines recommend that either a TST or an IGRA can be used to detect LTBI in high-income and upper middle-income countries with estimated TB incidences less than 100 per 100,000 population. Two skin tests (C-TB and Diaskintest), using only two specific M. tuberculosis antigens (ESAT-6 and CFP-10) instead of the tuberculin solution, have recently been developed but, to date, none of these tests is available on the European market.

CONCLUSION

Early identification and treatment of individuals with LTBI is an important priority for TB control in specific groups at risk within the population: this is of crucial meaning in recently infected cases both at the community level and in some occupational settings. Currently there is no gold standard test for LTBI: an improved understanding of the available tests is needed to develop better tools for diagnosing LTBI and predicting progression to clinical active disease.

Latent tuberculosis infection: recent progress and challenges in South Korea

Management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is a critical element in the elimination of tuberculosis (TB). However, the low positive predictive value of the current diagnostic tests and the low acceptance and completion rate of the isoniazid- based regimen are major barriers to the implementation and scale-up of programmatic management of LTBI. In the past decade, there has been some progress in the conception, diagnosis, and treatment of LTBI. LTBI is now understood as a dynamic spectrum rather than the traditional binary distinction between active and latent TB. New insight into LTBI has led to a renewed interest in incipient TB, which would be a potential target for developing new diagnostics and therapeutics of LTBI. Recent studies showed that host transcriptomic signatures could be a potential biomarker for incipient TB. The new shorter rifamycin-based regimens have shown comparable efficacy, but better completion rate and safety compared to the isoniazid-based regimen. In South Korea, LTBI management has been expanded and integrated into key elements of the National Tuberculosis Control Program. For the programmatic approach to LTBI management, the following challenges need to be addressed; target group selection, treatment-related interventions, monitoring and surveillance system, and extending the plan for vulnerable groups.