Impact of urgently initiated tele-prescription due to COVID-19 on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes

Digital Health and Shared Decision-Making in Diabetes Care - A Survey Initiative in Patients and Clinicians

OBJECTIVE

To assess the landscape of digital health resources in the United States, better understand the impact of the digital health on shared decision-making and identify potential barriers and opportunities for progress in the care of persons with diabetes.

METHODS

The study consisted of two phases: (1) A qualitative phase in which one-on-one interviews were conducted virtually with 34 physicians (Endocrinologists, Endos: n=15; primary care physicians, PCPs: n=19) between February 11-18, 2021, and (2) A quantitative phase in which two online, email-based surveys in the English language were conducted between April 16 and May 17, 2021: one with healthcare professionals (HCP) (n=403: n=200 Endos and n=203 PCPs), and one with persons with diabetes (n=517: patients with type 1 diabetes, n=257; patients with type 2 diabetes, n=260).

RESULTS

Diabetes digital health tools were found to be helpful in shared decision-making, but leading barriers include cost, coverage, and lack of time by healthcare professionals. Among diabetes digital health tools, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems were used most commonly and viewed as most effective in improving quality of life and facilitating shared decision-making. Strategies for increasing use of diabetes digital health resources included lower cost, integration into electronic health records, and increased simplicity of tools.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that both Endos and PCPs feel that diabetes digital health tools have an overall positive impact. Integration with telemedicine and simpler, lower cost tools with increased patient access can further facilitate shared decision-making and improved diabetes care and quality of life.

Quality outcome of diabetes care during COVID-19 pandemic: a primary care cohort study

AIM

Management of diabetes care can be affected by COVID-19 pandemic control measures. This study aimed to determine the impact of the pandemic, during 17.03.2020-16.03.2021, on quality outcomes of diabetes care in general practice in Switzerland.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, diabetes mellitus patients (≥ 18 years) with at least one consultation at a general practitioner, during 17.03.2018-16.03.2019 (cohort 1) and 17.03.2019-16.03.2020 (cohort 2) were included and followed-up for two years. Quality indicators and outcomes of diabetes care, at patient and practitioner level, were compared before and during the pandemic. Logistic regression was performed to identify patient's risk factors for dropout from follow-up.

RESULTS

Data from 191 practices, 23,903 patients, cohort 1 and 25,092 patients, cohort 2, were analyzed. The fraction of patients lost to follow-up, attributable to the pandemic, was 28% (95% confidence interval: 25%, 30%). During the pandemic, compared to the previous year, regular measurement of weight, HbA1c, blood pressure and serum creatinine were less frequent and less patients per practitioner reached HbA1c and blood pressure target outcomes. Factors associated with continuity of care during the pandemic were: patient age 41-80 years, longer diabetes duration, diagnosis of hypertension or dyslipidemia, influenza vaccination during the last year. Risk factors for dropout were age > 80 and receiving only insulin as anti-diabetic medication.

CONCLUSION

A considerable quality reduction in diabetes mellitus care could be observed during the pandemic. Though the most vulnerable patients were not the most affected by the pandemic, key factors that might reduce dropout from follow-up were identified.

Telehealth use in patients with type 2 diabetes in australian general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The Australian government introduced temporary government-subsidised telehealth service items (phone and video-conference) in mid-March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The uptake of telehealth by type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients for consulting with General Practitioners (GPs) is unknown.

Aim

To evaluate the uptake of telehealth consultations and associated patient characteristics in Australian general practice, including the frequency of HbA1c tests and change in HbA1c levels by telehealth use, compared to guideline recommendations.

Design & setting

This study used electronic patient data from approximately 800 general practices in Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. A pre-COVID-19 period from March 2019 to February 2020 was compared to a pandemic period from March 2020 to February 2021. Patients diagnosed with T2DM before March 2018 were included.

Method

Telehealth uptake patterns were examined overall and by patient characteristics. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine patient probability of 6-monthly HbA1c testing and change in HbA1c levels, comparing between patients who did and patients who did not use telehealth.

Results

Of 57,961 patients, 80.8% had telehealth consultations during the pandemic period. Telehealth consultations were positively associated with T2DM patients who were older, female, had chronic kidney disease, prescribed anti-diabetic medications, and living in remote areas. We found no significant difference in 6-monthly HbA1c testing and HbA1c levels between telehealth users and patients who had face-to-face consultations only.

Conclusion

Telehealth GP consultations were well utilised by T2DM patients. Diabetes monitoring care via telehealth may be utilised as effective measures as face-to-face consultations.