Effects of different epidural initiation volumes on postoperative analgesia in cesarean section

Exploring the Effect of Pain Sensitive Questionnaire on Guiding Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Randomised Double Blind Controlled Trial

Objective

This study investigates the effect of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) in guiding patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean section.

Methods

A total of 160 women who were to undergo a cesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia were included in this study. Women with a preoperative PSQ <4 were randomly divided into a low pain-sensitive control group (LC group), and a low pain-sensitive observation group (LO group), and women with preoperative PSQ >6 were randomly divided into a high pain-sensitive control group (HC group) and a high pain-sensitive observation group (HO group). After the surgery, patients received the pump butorphanol concentration was 3.5 µg·kg-1·h-1 in the LC and HC groups, 3.0 µg·kg-1·h-1 in the LO group and 4.0 µg·kg-1·h-1 in the HO group.To compare the analgesic effects of postoperative PCIA and postoperative recovery in women.

Results

Wound pain and uterine contraction pain VAS scores at rest and activity were significantly lower in the LC group than in the LO group at 4 and 8 h postoperatively (P<0.05). Similarly, wound pain and uterine contraction pain VAS scores at rest and activity were significantly lower in the HO group than in the HC group at 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively (P<0.05). The Ramsay scores were significantly higher in the LC than in the LO groups at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the Ramsay scores in the HC group and the HO group. There was no statistical difference in any of the post-operative recoveries (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared to the weight-based postoperative PCIA, the PSQ-based postoperative PCIA has better analgesic effects and can improve maternal satisfaction with postoperative analgesia.

Evaluation of impact of epidural volume extension on the quality of spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing surgeries - randomized controlled study

INTRODUCTION

Epidural volume extension is technique aiming to mitigate spinal anaesthesia induced hypotension, by reducing the dose of local anaesthetics. The present study was executed to determine the effect of epidural volume extension subarachnoid block with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing (PFN) regarding characteristics of sensory-motor block and postoperative analgesia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind trial conducted from October 2021 to April 2022, 105 adult patients scheduled to undergo PFN were randomised into groups: control (C), 10 mL NS (E1), and 20 mL NS (E2), to receive 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally plus additional epidural volume extension with 10 and 20 mL normal saline in groups E1 and E2, respectively. The primary outcome measured was the duration of postoperative analgesia. The secondary outcomes measured included onset of sensory- motor block and duration of sensory block. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A significantly longer duration of postoperative analgesia was noted in patients receiving 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension (365.09 ± 101.83 and 330.06 ± 35.22 vs. 265.77 ± 38.01 min in the control group, P < 0.01). Patients who received any epidural volume extension with either 10 or 20 mL had significantly quicker onset of sensory and motor block as well as prolonged duration of sensory block. No significant difference in duration of postoperative analgesia, and onset and duration of block was observed between patients receiving either 10 or 20 mL epidural volume extension.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural volume extension significantly shortened the onset of sensory-motor block and increased the duration of sensory block and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing PFN under subarachnoid block; however, no such difference was observed between 10 and 20 mL epidural volume extension.

Analgesia Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Combined with Intravenous Analgesia After Cesarean Section: A Double-Blind Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Complete postoperative analgesia is very important for puerperae after cesarean section. The objective of this study was to explore the optimal postoperative analgesia after cesarean section.

METHODS

A total of 180 full-term puerperae who underwent cesarean section in Hanzhong People's Hospital from March 2019 to March 2020 were enrolled and were randomly divided into three groups. Group A was given 0.9% normal saline, group B and C were given 0.4% ropivacaine for transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB). Postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pumps were 2 μg/kg sufentanil + 2.5 mg droperidol, 1.5 μg/kg and 1.3 μg/kg sufentanil, respectively. All puerperae were given different but effective analgesia programs. The primary outcome indicators were visual analog scores (VAS), the first compression time of postoperative analgesia pump and the total number of compressions in 48 h. The secondary outcome indicators were vital signs, Ramsay sedation scores, comfort scores (BCS), the frequency of analgesic rescue, postoperative side effects and satisfaction.

RESULTS

The dynamic and static VAS scores of the puerperae in group B at T₂ and T₆ were significantly lower than group A and at T₁₂, T₂₄ and T₄₈ were significantly lower than group C. Compared with group A, the dynamic and static VAS scores of puerperae in group C were lower at T₂ and T₆ and higher at T₁₂, T₂₄ and T₄₈. The Ramsay score and BCS score of the puerperae in group C at T₁₂, T₂₄ and T₄₈ were significantly lower than those in groups A and B.

CONCLUSIONS

PCIA with sufentanil alone or combined with TAPB can be safely and effectively used for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section. PCIA combined with TAPB had better analgesic effect and lower incidence of side effects while reducing the dose of opioids. The results of this study provide new ideas and insights for the choice of analgesia after cesarean section.