[Complexity in nursing practice : Toward a new conceptual framework in nursing care]

First Evidence on the Validity of the Complexity Index Derived from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care in Home Care Patients

OBJECTIVES

Recently, a Complexity Index (CI), based on the multidimensional complexity model and derived from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (interRAI HC) was proposed as a decision-support tool to help frontline health care professionals in their clinical evaluation to identify and analyze complex situations. This study aims to test the CI: (1) concurrent validity with another measure of complexity (ie, the COMID), (2) convergent validity with related constructs assessed by interRAI HC scales (eg, depression), (3) divergent validity (comparison between CI-COMID and scales-COMID correlations), and (4) predictive validity on coordination meetings.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional observational design was used for a secondary analysis of interRAI HC and COMID data collected in routine home care nursing practice (July-December 2021).

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Participants were community-dwelling adults receiving home care, with full interRAI HC and COMID assessments (N = 3533).

METHODS

Correlational analyses were conducted to test the concurrent validity of the CI (with the COMID) and the convergent and divergent validity of the CI (with interRAI HCSwitzerland scales, eg, Depression Rating Scale, Method for Assigning Priority Levels, and a Frailty Index). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to test the discriminative ability of CI on specific professional team coordination meetings.

RESULTS

Results showed that the CI correlated positively and strongly with the COMID (ρ = 0.691, P < .001, concurrent validity), positively with all the tested scales (P < .001, convergent validity), whereas the CI-COMID correlation was higher than the interRAI HC scales-COMID correlations (divergent validity). The ROC analysis showed the CI had a high area under the curve (AUC = 0.719, predictive validity).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The CI demonstrates good validity properties with a strong correlation with the COMID and a high predictive value for coordination meeting. It is distinct from the other interRAI HC scales and has its place among them to support the clinical analysis of complex situations.

Setting new priorities for nursing research: The updated Swiss Nursing Research Agenda-a systematic, participative approach

AIM

To identify current key areas for nursing research in Switzerland, we revised the Swiss Research Agenda for Nursing (SRAN) initially published in 2008.

BACKGROUND

By developing a research agenda, nursing researchers internationally prioritize and cluster relevant topics within the research community. The process should be collaborative and systematic to provide credible information for decisionmakers in health care research, policy, and practice.

SOURCES OF EVIDENCE

After a participative, systematic, and critical evaluation within and outside of the Swiss Association for Nursing Science, the updated SRAN 2019-2029 defines four research priorities (new models of care, nursing care interventions, work and care environment, and quality of care and patient safety) and four transversal themes (organization of research, research methodologies, research in health care policy and public health perspectives).

CONCLUSION

Adding to other national nursing research agendas, the categories are organized in a framework of key research priorities and transversal themes. They relate to the importance of global and local foci of research as well as challenges in health care services and policy systems. The agenda is an important prerequisite for enhancing the influence of nursing research in Switzerland and provides guidance for the next decade.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The revised agenda ensures that research projects target key knowledge gaps and the discipline's core questions in respective countries.

IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY

Nursing research should inform and influence health policy on all institutional and political levels. Therefore, the integration of public health perspectives in research is one of the most important new aspects of SRAN 2019-2029.

A social network analysis to explore collaborative practice in home care: research protocol

Background

The conceptualization of the home as a care environment and maintaining a high standard of care requires different professionals to collaborate. This study will explore collaborative practice in home care, needs and expectations of the stakeholders involved, and identify their roles and tasks. Secondly, it will investigate possible strategies to improve home care management and, more particularly, optimize collaborative practice in home care.

Methods

The study will be conducted during three distinct consecutive phases, within a multiphase mixed-methods design. Phase 1 will use a quantitative approach in which a social network analysis will be conducted to have an overview of collaborative practice in home care in French-speaking Switzerland. Phases 2 and 3 will be qualitative and focus on three different situations involving different locations (rural and urban) and different home care functioning (home care provided by agencies and home care providing by independent caregivers). In each situation, semi-structured interviews will be conducted with home care recipients and their home caregivers. In phase 2, results of phase 1’s network analysis will be discussed, such as roles, needs, and expectations of all stakeholders involved in home care. In phase 3, phase 2’s findings will be discussed and strategies to improve home care and to optimize collaborative practice will be explored.

Discussion

Over the past years, home care has grown considerably. Therefore, more and more different caregivers are involved in the recipients' homes. Since optimal coordination between these different caregivers is a prerequisite for quality and safe care, it is essential to investigate the existing collaborative practice and how it is functioning. This study will provide knowledge on roles, needs and expectations of different caregivers involved in home care. It will also allow for strategies to optimize collaborative practice and thus ensure comprehensive care for recipients. Finally, it will serve as a basis for future studies that can be conducted to address identified needs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08548-4.

Assessing multidimensional complexity in home care: congruencies and discrepancies between patients and nurses

BACKGROUND

Person-centered care allows for the inclusion of the totality of a person's needs and preferences, beyond just the clinical or medical aspect. This approach requires the development of tools to allow for the integration of the patient in his/her healthcare. Based on a 30-item tool developed for nurses to evaluate the complexity of home care situations (COMID), this study proposed a version for the patients (i.e. COMID-P). Both instruments were used, independently by nurses and patients, to rate the complexity of individual situations, in order to compare ratings.

METHODS

The COMID-P and the COMID were completed during the fraXity study at the patients' homes, independently by patients (aged 65 and over) and nurses. Item-level and scale-level analyses were performed using, Kappa and McNemar tests, and intra-class correlation (ICC).

RESULTS

A total of 159 pairs of COMID and COMID-P ratings were retained for analyses. Results demonstrated a high degree of patient/nurse agreement for 12/30 items, a moderate agreement for 10/30 items, and a low degree of agreement for 7/30 items. The intra-class correlation between the COMID-P and the COMID was high (ICC= .826, 95%CI [.761-.873]).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that patients and nurses can assess complexity using tools that have comparable structural properties. They also reveal congruencies and discrepancies in scoring the components of complexity, highlighting the need of reaching consensus in designing care plans. Further work is needed to demonstrate the benefits of joint assessment in developing care plans that truly meet patients' needs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The fraXity study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03883425 , on March 20, 2019.

Tooling nurses to assess complexity in routine home care practice: Derivation of a complexity index from the interRAI-HC

AIM

Home care nurses often use the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (interRAI-HC) to assess health needs. However, this tool does not assess complexity. This study proposes to derive a complexity index (CI) from the interRAI-HC using the operational definition of the dedicated COMID checklist (COmplexité Multidimensionnelle des prises en soins Infirmières à Domicile).

DESIGN

Data were collected at the baseline assessment of the fraXity study (N = 231, aged ≥ 65), which relied on an observational longitudinal design.

METHODS

Measures were the interRAI-HC, from which the CI binary variables were computed and the COMID, used as a reference.

RESULTS

Twenty-six CI variables were computed from the interRAI-HC, and all but three correlations were significant. The correlation between the CI score and the COMID score was ρ = 0.730 (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that complexity can be assessed directly from the interRAI-HC by deriving a CI.