Effect of water depth on limb and back kinematics in horses walking on a water treadmill

Water treadmill (WT) exercise is frequently used for training/rehabilitation of horses. There is limited study into the effect of water depth on limb/back kinematics warranting investigation. The objective was to determine the effect of walking in different water depths, at the same speed, on limb/back kinematics measured simultaneously in a group of horses. Six horses (age:15±6.5 years) completed a standardised WT exercise session (19min duration; speed:1.6m/s; water depths:0.0/7.5/21.0/32.0/47.0cm). Ten waterproof light-emitting-diode tea-light-markers and reflective-spheres were affixed to the skin at predetermined locations; inertial-measurement-units were fixed to the poll/withers/left and right tubera coxae (TC)/sacrum to determine range-of-motion (ROM) changes of these locations. Univariable-mixed-effects-linear-regression-analyses were carried out, with a significance value of P≤0.05. At maximum carpal/tarsal flexion during swing, regression analyses showed a clear and consistent non-linear increase in carpal and tarsal flexion at increasing water depths (P<0.0001 for both variables). As water depth increased there was a significant increase in thoracic spine flexion-extension ROM (P<0.0001 at all thoracic sites) and increased dorsoventral and mediolateral ROM of the sacrum/left and right TC (P<0.001 for all variables) as water depth increased. Results suggest that horses responded to an increase in water depth until a threshold depth was reached when the biomechanical response levelled off, and there was increased pelvic roll. In conclusion, changes in limb kinematics brought about by relatively modest increases in water depth at walking speed of 1.6m/s are sufficient to induce significant changes in back/pelvic movement highlighting key issues with relevance for WT programme design.

Characteristics of the Flight Arc in Horses Jumping Three Different Types of Fences in Olympic Competition

Show jumping horses must execute fences of varying height and width, but the effect of this on jumping kinematics during the airborne phase have not been described. The aim of this study was to describe differences within- and between-horses in CM trajectory, trunk orientation and average trunk angular velocity in a group of elite horses executing three fences: vertical fence (1.60 m), spread fence (1.50 × 1.80 m), water jump (4.5 m) during an Olympic competition. Two-dimensional kinematic data (60 Hz) were collected from video cameras set perpendicular to each fence. After manual digitization, linear and angular variables related to the position and rotation of the CM and trunk were calculated. Linear fixed effects models evaluated within-group differences between fences and kinematic variables. Repeated measures correlation (rmcorr) evaluated within-horse associations between kinematic variables and fence type. Compared with the water jump, CM vertical velocity, CM peak height, and average trunk angular velocity were significantly higher (P < .05) and CM horizontal velocity was significantly lower (P < .05) for the vertical and spread fences. Peak CM height coincided approximately with the middle of the spread fence, toward the take-off for the water jump and landing for the vertical fence. The trunk was significantly more inclined at take-off for the vertical fence and significantly less inclined for the water jump at landing. Rmcorr analysis revealed that individual horses generally employ similar jumping techniques for each fence type. Findings provide original insight into the mechanical requirements for elite horses jumping different fence types.