Evidence-based practices in developing and maintaining clinical nurse preceptors: An integrative review

OBJECTIVES

This integrative review of literature explores the best practice for establishing and maintaining a hospital-based nurse preceptor program. The intent is to provide nurse leadership and educators with guidance for optimizing preceptor programs in order to improve patient, staff, and organizational outcomes.

DESIGN

The project team conducted an integrative review of literature to inform best practice using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources included the PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Each applicable article underwent a rigorous review and appraisal by the project team. The team used the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model to guide the appraisal process and to synthesize results to generate a comprehensive list of recommendations.

RESULTS

The search yielded 115 unique articles that answered the evidence-based practice question. What are best practices for establishing and maintaining a hospital-based nursing preceptor program? Due to the abundance of data, the practice question was divided into three separate sub questions that explored preceptor development, continuous preceptor support, and essential competencies of preceptors. Relevant evidence included one level I article, seven level II articles, and one level IV article. Most of the evidence was found in articles ranking as level III (n = 54) and level V (n = 52).

CONCLUSIONS

Many preceptorship themes and recommendations resonate throughout multiple levels of evidence. Recommendations include implementing an evidence-based, standardized curriculum that features diverse teaching modalities, critical thinking, and clinical reasoning. Common themes in the literature echo that preceptors need ongoing education, training, and support to improve nursing satisfaction, retention, and the quality of nursing care.

ICU nurse preceptors' perceptions of benefits, rewards, supports and commitment to the preceptor role: A mixed-methods study

This paper explores Intensive Care nurses' perceptions of benefits, rewards, supports and their commitment to the role of preceptor. A questionnaire, consisting of Likert-scales and open-ended questions was used to collect data during October 2018. Preceptors were committed to their role. Correlations were found between preceptors' perceptions of benefits or rewards and commitment to the role (p = 0.003, r² = 0.39) and perceptions of support and commitment to the role (p = .001, r² = 0.46). Altruistic benefits were perceived to be of the greatest importance. Participants who recognised the importance of preceptorship for the organisation were more likely to be committed to the role. Eighty-three percent of respondents reported a lack of consistency in allocation to work with their preceptee. Qualitative results elucidated themes of helping, personal professional development, the opportunity to teach, and organisational improvement. Supports as barriers and enablers to successful preceptorship were discussed in terms of peer and leadership support, role preparation, the logistics of the environment, role conflict, and consistency of allocation to work in a preceptorship dyad. Commitment to the preceptor role may be increased by highlighting organisational benefits of preceptorship, increasing consistency of contact between preceptorship dyads, and increasing access to supports and preparation.

Preceptorship of Student Nurses in Ghana: A Descriptive Phenomenology Study

Background

Preceptorship plays an integral part in the clinical training of nursing and midwifery students, especially in high-income countries where it is a well-accepted concept. However, in Ghana, most nurses and midwives do not view preceptorship as part of their role.

Aim

The aim of this study was to explore the lived experiences of preceptorship of student nurses and the challenges confronting the preceptorship role.

Methods

A descriptive phenomenological study was conducted with 22 purposively selected preceptors aged 34 to 56 years from five clinical placement sites in the Cape Coast Metropolis in the Central Region of Ghana. Most of the participants had been preceptors for two to 18 years. In-depth interviews were conducted with the aid of a semistructured interview guide and analysed by qualitative thematic analysis inspired by Braun and Clarke's description of the method.

Results

The essence of the phenomenon has been captured in three main themes: (1) being excited about the role as it offered opportunities to learn and build relationship with students. (2) Encountering challenges including student's unwillingness to learn, absenteeism, and disrespect and also lack of interest of staff to assist students, time constraints, workload, burnout, parallel schedules of preceptors, and large student numbers, and (3) the need for effective collaboration between educational institutions and hospitals.

Conclusions

Though preceptors were excited about precepting student nurses, the challenges associated with it are multidimensional which requires effective collaboration between educational institutions and clinical placement sites.

Development and reliability testing of the quality clinical placement evaluation tool

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To develop and test the content and face validity, and reliability of the quality clinical placement evaluation tool.

BACKGROUND

The importance of clinical experience during undergraduate nursing degrees is undisputed. To date, tools available to measure quality of clinical placements have focused on single perspectives, that of the undergraduate or that of the supervising nurse. The quality clinical placement evaluation tool was proposed to provide an assessment of clinical placement experiences informed by supervising ward nurses and undergraduate stakeholders.

DESIGN

The study employed a cross-sectional design.

METHODS

The internal validity of an existing instrument was evaluated by an expert panel and modified for use in the acute care sector. Surveys were completed by undergraduate students (n = 48) and supervising ward nurses (n = 47). Factor analysis was used to identify themes drawn from the literature and explore redundancy of items. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and test-retest (five to seven days apart).

RESULTS

Reliability testing showed good internal consistency for the tool; test-retest reliability testing results were moderate to good for students and fair to moderate for nurses. Factor analysis identified three core themes related to supervising ward nurse responses that could also be applied to undergraduate nurses. The domains identified were the following: welcome and belonging; support to meet learning needs; and confidence and competence: reflections on learning.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality clinical placement evaluation has shown statistically acceptable levels of reliability and validity for measuring the quality of clinical placement from perspectives of undergraduates and supervising ward nurses.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The tool provides tertiary institutions, acute care facilities, wards and individuals with the means to capture views of the quality of clinical placement which can also be used to undertake comparisons over time and between sites.