Development of a Clinical Judgment Scale for Japanese Nurses

Effectiveness of a Simulation-Based Education Program to Improve Novice Nurses' Clinical Judgment Skills

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the effectiveness of a simulation-based education program to improve novice nurses' clinical judgment skills.

METHODS

A simulation education program was implemented for 21 novice nurses. Surveys were conducted on program satisfaction, learning, and clinical judgment skills before, immediately after, and two months after the program.

RESULTS

Novice nurses were highly satisfied with the simulation education program. The following nine categories were identified as learnings: provide psychological care for patients, conduct sufficient observation, conduct assessment and make judgment based on observational findings, consult and report appropriately to senior nurses, take response action calmly, collect necessary information, acquire knowledge, predict patients' conditions, and make environmental arrangements. The subscale score for theoretical and practical reasoning was significantly higher immediately after and two months after the program than before it. In addition, the subscale for grasping the condition by observation was significantly higher two months after the program than before and immediately after it.

CONCLUSION

The novice nurses learned to sufficiently observe, obtain necessary information, and prospectively assess patients' conditions by taking part in the simulation education program. The subscale score for grasping the condition by observation was significantly higher two months after the program than before and immediately after it. After the simulation program, novice nurses were likely actively practicing nursing; therefore, this program may not be directly responsible for the improvement of these new nurses' clinical judgment. Nevertheless, we found that the completion of the simulation program was correlated with enhanced clinical judgment.

[Development of Nursing Clinical Judgment Scale]

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a nursing clinical judgment scale (NCJS) and verify its validity and reliability in assessing the clinical judgment of nurses.

METHODS

A preliminary instrument of the NCJS comprising 38 items was first developed from attributes and indicators derived from a literature review and an in-depth/focus interview with 12 clinical nurses. The preliminary tool was finalized after 7 experts conducted a content validity test based on a data from a preliminary survey of 30 hospital nurses in Korea. Data were collected from 443 ward, intensive care unit, emergency room nurses who voluntarily participated in the survey through offline and online for the verification of the construct validity and reliability of the scale.

RESULTS

The final scale comprised 23 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Six factors- integrated data analysis, evaluation and reflection on interventions, evidence on interventions, collaboration among health professionals, patient-centered nursing, and collaboration among nurse colleagues - accounted for 64.9% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the fit of the measurement model, comprising six factors (root mean square error of approximation = .07, standardized root mean square residual = .04, comparative fit index = .90). Cronbach's α for all the items was .92.

CONCLUSION

The NCJS is a valid and reliable tool that fully reflects the characteristics of clinical practice, and it can be used effectively to evaluate the clinical judgment of Korean nurses. Future research should reflect the variables influencing clinical judgment and develop an action plan to improve it.