Interventions to prevent periodontal disease in tobacco-, alcohol-, and drug-dependent individuals

Substance abuse affects more than one sixth of the world's population. More importantly, the nature of the abuse and the type of addictive substances available to individuals is increasing exponentially. All substances with abusive potential impact both the human immuno-inflammatory system and oral microbial communities, and therefore play a critical role in the etiopathogenesis of periodontal diseases. Evidence strongly supports the efficacy of professionally delivered cessation counseling. Dentists, dental therapists, and hygienists are ideally placed to deliver this therapy, and to spearhead efforts to provide behavioral and pharmacologic support for cessation. The purpose of this review is to examine the biologic mechanisms underlying their role in disease causation, to understand the pharmacologic and behavioral basis for their habituation, and to investigate the efficacy of population-based and personalized interventions in prevention of periodontal disease.

Real-world memory and executive processes in cannabis users and non-users

The relationships between executive processes, associative learning and different aspects of real world memory functioning were explored in a sample of cannabis users and nonusers. Measures of executive component processes, associative learning, everyday memory, prospective memory, and cognitive failures were administered. Relative to nonusers, cannabis users were found to be impaired in several aspects of real world memory functioning. No other group differences were apparent. The absence of cannabis related deficits in those executive component processes and aspects of learning that are believed to support real world memory processes is surprising given that cannabis related deficits were obtained in real world memory. The present results are discussed within the context of neuroimaging evidence which suggests that cannabis users may exhibit different patterns of neural activation when performing executive tasks while not always exhibiting deficits on these tasks.

Are cannabinoid drugs neurotoxic or neuroprotective?

Chronic exposure to cannabinoids was shown to induce long lasting impairment of learning and memory, which was accompanied by morphological damage to the brain. On the other hand, several studies have shown that cannabinoids can protect from various brain traumas. This enigmatic dualism is explained herein by a comprehensive hypothesis, which is based on our recent in vitro studies and on pharmacokinetic in vivo considerations. The hypothesis predicts that low concentrations of cannabinoids will be neurotoxic while high concentrations of the drugs will protect from neuronal damage, and suggests that chronic administration of cannabinoids will induce neuronal death, while their acute administration will protect the brain. We further propose straight forward experiments, both in vivo (animal models for brain damage) and in vitro (cell death in neuronal cultures) to verify this hypothesis. The outcome of these experiments may have practical applications when considering the use of cannabinoids as therapeutic agents and in evaluating the consequences of their use as recreational drugs.

Marijuana: a decade and a half later, still a crude drug with underappreciated toxicity

In 1984, I published in this journal a review entitled "Marijuana: A Crude Drug With a Spectrum of Underappreciated Toxicity." In the introduction to that article, I disclosed that our son Keith, who was 15 years old at the time, was in a long-term, modified outpatient adolescent drug and alcohol rehabilitation program because he had become dependent on marijuana with its associated behavioral, interpersonal, scholastic, and antisocial problems. Keith and most of his friends had experimented several times with LSD, beer, and several other drugs but never used injection drugs. Marijuana was clearly Keith's drug of choice and the only drug he used with regularity. Approximately 1 year later, Keith graduated from the treatment program. He completed the early aftercare component, relapsed several times, and completed a 4-month refresher drug rehabilitation program in another state. Nine years after admission to the first rehabilitation program, Keith finally attained some adult goals. Now 34 years old, he has been drug-free for 10 years. He is the president and owner of a successful discount cellular phone business that he started. More important, a decade ago, he reestablished an excellent and close relationship with his parents. As far as I can tell, Keith remains drug-free except for an occasional beer.