Antiviral treatment and prophylaxis of influenza virus in children

The value of neuraminidase inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of seasonal influenza: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Controversy has arisen regarding the effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors (NIs), especially against influenza-related complications. A literature search was performed to critically assess the evidence collected by the available systematic reviews (SRs) regarding the benefits and disadvantages of NIs (oseltamivir, zanamivir) compared to placebos in healthy and at-risk individuals of all ages for prophylaxis and treatment of seasonal influenza. A SR was done using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Technology Assessment Database, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Medline (January 2006-July 2012). Two reviewers selected SRs based on randomized clinical trials, which were restricted to intention-to-treat results, and they assessed review (AMSTAR) and study quality indicators (GRADE). The SRs included (N = 9) were of high quality. The efficacy of NIs in prophylaxis ranged from 64% (16-85) to 92% (37-99); the absolute risk reduction ranged from 1.2% to 12.1% (GRADE moderate to low). Clinically relevant treatment benefits of NIs were small in healthy adults and children suffering from influenza-like illness (GRADE high to moderate). Oseltamivir reduced antibiotic usage in healthy adults according to one SR, but this was not confirmed by other reviews (GRADE low). Zanamivir showed a preventive effect on antibiotic usage in children (95% (77-99);GRADE moderate) and on the occurrence of bronchitis in at-risk individuals (59% (30-76);GRADE moderate). No evidence was available on the treatment benefits of NIs in elderly and at-risk groups and their effects on hospitalization and mortality. In oseltamivir trials, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea were significant side-effects. For zanamivir trials, no adverse effects have been reported. The combination of diagnostic uncertainty, the risk for virus strain resistance, possible side effects and financial cost outweigh the small benefits of oseltamivir or zanamivir for the prophylaxis and treatment of healthy individuals. No relevant benefits of these NIs on complications in at-risk individuals have been established.

Treatment options for H5N1: lessons learned from the H1N1 pandemic

Human infections with avian influenza A (H5N1) are relatively rare but are associated with high mortality. As of July 5, 2010 there had been 500 cases and 296 fatalities. The influenza virus readily undergoes mutation and reassortment, and there are concerns that an H5N1 variant could be responsible for a future pandemic. The influenza neuraminidase inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivir are approved for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza. Oseltamivir is being used to treat H5N1 infections and the case has been made for a role for zanamivir; however, there are no case reports for the latter. Zanamivir is a potent inhibitor of H5N1, attains high lung concentrations immediately on administration, distributes into plasma at antiviral concentrations, has a low propensity for generating resistant virus, and retains activity against H275Y oseltamivir-resistant virus. There have been several reports of oseltamivir-resistant H5N1 arising during treatment with oseltamivir, and zanamivir retains effectiveness (in vitro or in vivo) against these isolates. Compassionate use of intravenous zanamivir for the treatment of seriously ill patients, including those with H275Y H1N1 infections, has also shown promising results. It is concluded that there is a role for zanamivir in treating H5N1 infections either as the approved, inhaled formulation in patients capable of using the Diskhaler, or as the intravenous formulation if compassionate use is warranted. The relatively small number of patients with these infections remains an obstacle to completion of clinical trials. Evidence is therefore likely to be based on carefully documented case reports, ideally in patients treated early in the course of the infection.