Suicidal ambivalence: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Suicidal ambivalence is considered a characteristic condition of suicidal individuals. At the same time, there is a lack of a uniform definition, conception and assessment of suicidal ambivalence. On this background, the current scoping review aims to explore the extent, range, and nature of research activity on suicidal ambivalence and to summarize research findings.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in four different databases (PubMed, Psychinfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) using an array of search terms (e.g., ambivalence, internal suicide debate, reasons for living and reasons for dying, wish to live and wish to die).

RESULTS

In total, 28 articles published between 1977 and 2023 were included in the scoping review. The study situation lacks a clear definition, conceptualization and operationalization of suicidal ambivalence. Nonetheless, suicidal ambivalence is a common experience in persons contemplating suicide and suicidal ambivalence seems to be present before, during and after a suicide attempt. Suicidal ambivalence is associated with diverse markers of negative/positive mental health as well as suicidal ideation and behavior.

CONCLUSION

Results point to the relevance of suicidal ambivalence. At the same time, there are large gaps in knowledge about the development, impact and therapeutic responsiveness of suicidal ambivalence.

Living with suicidal thoughts: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

There is a significantly higher number of people experiencing severe levels of suicidal thoughts compared to that of suicidal deaths and suicide attempts. In suicide prevention research, there is a shift towards greater emphasis on people's experiences of living with suicidal thoughts. This can expand the existing evidence base, which is dominated by a biomedical approach. The aim of this review was to summarise and disseminate existing research on the lived experiences of living with suicidal thoughts.

METHODS

A scoping review by Arksey & O'Malley consisting of six stages: (1) formulating the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting studies, (4) mapping data, (5) summarising the results and (6) consulting stakeholders. PubMed, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched for studies in English, Danish, Swedish and Norwegian. Peer-reviewed articles examining people's experiences of living with suicidal thoughts using qualitative methods were included. The search was supplemented with a citation pearl search in the Web of Science database. Twenty-eight studies were included.

RESULTS

The findings were organised under two thematic headings: (a) the significance of social connections and (b) a loss of the personal self.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for further qualitative research of people's experiences of living with suicidal thoughts from an everyday life perspective. Awareness about social connections and attachment in mental health prevention and governance is crucial. Trauma-informed care could be a useful approach to prevent suicidal thoughts as the review found that many participants had traumatic experiences in both childhood and adulthood. As part of the treatment of suicidal thoughts, it might be useful to have a focus on narrative and communicative methods and their clinical application.

Factors determining the balance between the wish to die and the wish to live in older adults

BACKGROUND

The "Internal Struggle Hypothesis" (Kovacs and Beck, ) suggests that suicidal persons may have both a wish to live (WTL) and a wish to die (WTD). The current study investigates whether the three-group typology - "WTL", "ambivalent (AMB)", and "WTD" - is determined by common correlates of suicidality and whether these groups can be ordinally ranked.

METHODS

The sample comprised 113 older inpatients. Discriminant analysis was used to create two functions (combining social, psychiatric, psychological, and somatic variables) to predict the assignment of older inpatients into the groups WTL, AMB, and WTD.

RESULTS

The functions "Subjective Well-being" and "Social Support" allowed us to assign patients into these three distinct groups with good accuracy (66.1%). "Subjective Well-being" contrasted the groups WTD and WTL and "Social Support" discriminated between the groups WTD and AMB. "Social Support" was highest in the AMB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a simultaneous presence of a WTL and a WTD in older inpatients, and also that the balance between them is determined by "Subjective Well-being" and "Social Support". Unexpectedly, the AMB group showed the highest scores on "Social Support". We hypothesize that higher social support might function as an important determinant of a remaining WTL when a WTD is present because of a lower sense of well-being. The study suggests that the groups WTL-AMB-WTD can not situated on a one-dimensional continuum. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.