Diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis: clinical, radiological and scintigraphic features

Joint EANM/ESNR and ESCMID-endorsed consensus document for the diagnosis of spine infection (spondylodiscitis) in adults

PURPOSE

Diagnosis of spondylodiscitis (SD) may be challenging due to the nonspecific clinical and laboratory findings and the need to perform various diagnostic tests including serologic, imaging, and microbiological examinations. Homogeneous management of SD diagnosis through international, multidisciplinary guidance would improve the sensitivity of diagnosis and lead to better patient outcome.

METHODS

An expert specialist team, comprising nuclear medicine physicians appointed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), neuroradiologists appointed by the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), and infectious diseases specialists appointed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), reviewed the literature from January 2006 to December 2015 and proposed 20 consensus statements in answer to clinical questions regarding SD diagnosis. The statements were graded by level of evidence level according to the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria and included in this consensus document for the diagnosis of SD in adults. The consensus statements are the result of literature review according to PICO (P:population/patients, I:intervention/indicator, C:comparator/control, O:outcome) criteria. Evidence-based recommendations on the management of adult patients with SD, with particular attention to radiologic and nuclear medicine diagnosis, were proposed after a systematic review of the literature in the areas of nuclear medicine, radiology, infectious diseases, and microbiology.

RESULTS

A diagnostic flow chart was developed based on the 20 consensus statements, scored by level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus document was developed with a final diagnostic flow chart for SD diagnosis as an aid for professionals in many fields, especially nuclear medicine physicians, radiologists, and orthopaedic and infectious diseases specialists.

Clinical assessment and medical treatment of spine infections

Spinal infections affect the vertebral bodies, the intervertebral disks, the spinal canal, and the paravertebral soft tissues and structures. A delay in diagnosis can result in spine deformity, substantial neurologic complications, and even death. Because of this, a high level of awareness is required by physicians in order to diagnose infections of the spine promptly. Advances in medical microbiologic testing and newer imaging methods have contributed considerably to the medical treatment of these infections. Through careful followup, less invasive approaches orchestrated by a multidisciplinary team that includes a spine surgeon, an infectious diseases specialist, and a neuroradiologist may be sufficient to treat patients with these infections. Research done through multidisciplinary collaborations will further advance our knowledge for the successful treatment of spinal infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V (expert opinion). Please see the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

General principles in the medical and surgical management of spinal infections: a multidisciplinary approach

OBJECT

Infections along the spinal axis are characterized by an insidious onset, and the resulting delays in diagnosis are associated with serious neurological consequences and even death. Infections of the spine can affect the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, spinal canal, and surrounding soft tissues. Neurological dysfunction occurs when the spinal cord becomes compressed, edematous, or ischemic due to compression by abscess or vascular compromise. The aim of this paper was to detail general diagnostic and management principles for this disease.

METHODS

Recent progress in medical technologies, including the development of potent antimicrobial drugs, advanced imaging, and improved surgical methods, have dramatically reduced morbidity and mortality rates for spinal infections; however, debate still exists on the proper management of this disease. In this paper, the authors review the current management protocols for spinal infections at their institution, focusing on medical and surgical treatments for vertebral osteomyelitis, intervertebral disc space infections, and spinal canal and soft-tissue abscesses.

CONCLUSIONS

Technological advances in imaging modalities, pharmaceutics, and surgery have resulted in excellent outcomes and have greatly reduced the morbidity and mortality rates associated with spinal infections. Currently, treatment of spinal infections requires a multidisciplinary team that includes infectious diseases experts, neuroradiologists, and spine surgeons. The key to successful management of spinal infections is early detection.

Clinical feasibility of two-step streptavidin/111In-biotin scintigraphy in patients with suspected vertebral osteomyelitis

PURPOSE

Streptavidin accumulates at sites of inflammation and infection as a result of increased capillary permeability. In addition to being utilised by bacteria for their own growth, biotin forms a stable, high-affinity non-covalent complex with avidin. The objective of this investigation was to determine the diagnostic performance of two-step streptavidin/111In-biotin imaging for evaluating patients with suspected vertebral osteomyelitis.

METHODS

We evaluated 55 consecutive patients with suspected vertebral osteomyelitis (34 women and 21 men aged 27-86 years), within 2 weeks after the onset of clinical symptoms. Thirty-two of the patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 24, computed tomography (CT). DTPA-conjugated biotin was radiolabelled by incubating 500 microg of DTPA-biotin with 111 MBq of 111In-chloride. Two-step scintigraphy was performed by first infusing 3 mg streptavidin intravenously, followed 4 h later by 111In-biotin. Imaging was begun 60 min later.

RESULTS

Streptavidin/111In-biotin scintigraphy was positive in 32/34 patients with spinal infection (94.12% sensitivity). The study was negative in 19/21 patients without infection (95.24% specificity). The corresponding results for MRI and CT were 54.17% and 35.29% (sensitivity), and 75% and 57.14% (specificity), respectively. All statistical parameters of diagnostic performance (Youden's J index, kappa measure of agreement with correct classification, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood and negative likelihood) were clearly better for streptavidin/111In-biotin scintigraphy than for either MRI or CT.

CONCLUSION

Streptavidin/111In-biotin scintigraphy is highly sensitive and specific for detecting vertebral osteomyelitis in the first 2 weeks after the onset of clinical symptoms, and is potentially very useful for guiding clinical decisions on instituting appropriate therapy.

Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis presenting as exudative pleural effusion: a series of five cases

Five patients are reported who have pleural effusion and pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. In four of the five patients, the presenting problem was a large pleural effusion, and three of these four patients had an exudative effusion. Initial evaluation and investigations in these patients were directed toward the pleuropulmonary disease, delaying the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, and in two patients, this delay resulted in neurologic complications. In the fifth patient, the pleural effusion was initially small; however, during the course of a workup for osteomyelitis, the effusion increased rapidly. Two out of the five patients had empyema, and the other three patients had a large pleural effusion associated with and apparently caused by vertebral osteomyelitis. Vertebral osteomyelitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion of uncertain cause especially if there is associated back pain.

Multimodality imaging of osteomyelitis

Early diagnosis of osteomyelitis continues to be a clinical problem. Multiple imaging modalities are being used for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, but none of them is ideal for all cases. The choice of modality depends on several factors based on an understanding of the pathophysiologic aspects of different forms of osteomyelitis. After a brief introduction outlining some basic principles regarding the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, pathophysiologic aspects are reviewed. Advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality and their applications in different forms of osteomyelitis are discussed. The use of different imaging modalities in the diagnosis of special forms of osteomyelitis, including chronic, diabetic foot, and vertebral osteomyelitis, and osteomyelitis associated with orthopedic appliances and sickle cell disease is reviewed. Taking into account the site of suspected osteomyelitis and the presence or absence of underlying pathologic changes and their nature, an algorithm summarizing the use of various imaging modalities in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis is presented.

Radionuclide imaging in osteomyelitis

The utility of bone imaging has remained significantly high despite the proven suboptimal specificity of the conventional three-phase bone scan. The quantitative four-phase study may play a role in maintaining its usefulness in the future. However, due to its extremely high sensitivity and excellent anatomical information, it remains as the first diagnostic study in most suspected cases of acute osteomyelitis. The future would see development of new imaging modalities aimed at enhancing the specificity for diagnosis of active osteomyelitis. The indium leucocyte study has been the single most important development in this respect in the last decade. NMR has been another important addition to complement the anatomical information for defining the extent and nature of infectious process--acute or chronic. It remains to be seen if the other investigative work on antigranulocyte antibodies or other imaging agents or techniques would make the future diagnosis of osteomyelitis more reliable and accurate using the nuclear medicine techniques.