Low lumbar burst fractures: comparison between conservative and surgical treatments

Long-Segment Versus Short-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation Including Fractured Vertebrae for the Management of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Background For the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures, this study compared the results of short-segment fixation with fracture level inclusion (SSFIFL) with long-segment pedicle fixation (LSPF). Methodology In this prospective case series study conducted from January 2015 to January 2019, 80 patients with partial spinal cord lesions were investigated. For the comparison, two groups of 40 patients each were chosen and treated with SSFIFL and LSPF. The outcomes were measured using pre and postoperative radiological parameters and clinical parameters. The radiographic variables included the kyphotic angle with loss of correction, kyphotic deformation, and the Beck index. Mean blood loss, operative time, and cost-effectiveness were also examined for clinical indicators such as the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results There were no substantial variations between the groups regarding age or gender, trauma etiology, fracture level, or fracture pattern. Between the two categories, there appeared to be no notable change in radiological indicators such as kyphotic angle, kyphotic deformation, and Beck index at the end of follow-up (p = 0.120, 0.360, and 0.776, respectively). Both groups had similar neurological outcomes (p = 0.781). In terms of ODI and VAS, statistically, there was no discernible difference (p = 0.567 and 0.161, respectively). In this study, however, there was less surgical time, blood loss, and implant cost (p = 0.05). Conclusions When fracture level is included in a short-segment fixation, the radiological and clinical results are comparable to long-segment posterior fixation. Ultimately, this treatment has proven to be not only a motion segment-saving procedure but also cost-effective.

Short-Segment Pedicle Fixation of Traumatic Low Lumbar Fractures (L3-L5): Report of 36 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of short-segment pedicle fixation of low lumbar fractures (L3-L5).

BACKGROUND

Low lumbar fractures are relatively uncommon, and limited data exists regarding the management of these injuries. No previous studies have specifically examined the surgical management of L3-L5 fractures exclusively with pedicle fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed prospectively collected data of 36 patients who underwent short-segment pedicle fixation for low lumbar fractures at our institution between 1993 and 2018.

RESULTS

There was no worsening of neurological status following surgery, and three patients regained motor or sphincter function. Thirty-one (86.1%) patients went on to successful fusion. Three (8%) patients required reoperation. Four (11%) patients had surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This large series provides information regarding the safety and efficacy of surgical management of low lumbar fractures with pedicle fixation. Following surgery, there was no neurological worsening and some patients regained neurological function. Low complication rates, low reoperation rates, and low pain levels at final follow-up provide evidence that the surgical management of low lumbar fractures utilizing short-segment pedicle fixation is safe and efficacious.

Burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra: Case series and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) are rare injuries and typically occur because of high-energy axial compressive load. Their unique anatomy and biomechanical characteristics distinguish them from other lumbar spine injuries. To the best of our knowledge, the treatment strategies for L5 burst fractures have not been thoroughly described. The aims of this case series and systematic review were to highlight the treatment strategies and outcomes of the L5 burst fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series of 8 patients treated for burst L5 fractures in our institution between 2005 and 2020. Additionally, a systematic review via PubMed and Cochrane Library databases according to PRISMA guidelines was performed to review L5 burst fractures treatment strategies. Only Articles in English with full text available were included. The references of the selected studies were checked to find all possible related articles. Treatment strategies were conservative, posterior segmental instrumentation and fixation (PSIF), PSIF with anterior corpectomy (AC), and PSIF with posterior corpectomy (PC). Outcomes measures included neurological status, radiological regional alignment, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1449 publications were found, and 29 articles were finally selected for analysis. Of those, 15 were retrospective case reports, and 14 were retrospective case series. One hundred and sixty-nine patients were found in the review. The author's eight cases were added to the found in the literature for a methodological quality assessment. There were 52 (29%) patients managed non-operative, and 125 (71%) underwent surgery. One-hundred-two patients were neurologically intact, of whom 46 were managed non-operative. Canal compromise in intact patients ranged between 20 and 90%. Posterior segmental fixation and instrumentation with decompression was the preferred surgical strategy in patients with neurological deficits. Patients with combined anterior column restoration and anterior approach showed vertebral height and lordosis restoration. A 79% of the operative treated group reported neurological improvement. Patients with pre-operative neurological deficit managed non-operative reported the highest rate of complications (33.3%).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of L5 burst fractures, neurological injuries have a promising prognosis after surgery and are not correlated with the degree of canal stenosis. The compromise of the L5 vertebra affects the sagittal balance and its restoration can be achieved with an anterior corpectomy. Nonoperative management can be considered in cases of reasonable alignment, and no neurologic deficit.

Modified pedicle screw placement at the fracture level for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment for burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine is controversial. The addition of screws in the fractured segment has been shown to improve construct stiffness, but can aggravate the trauma to the fractured vertebra. Therefore, optimised placement of two pedicle screws at the fracture level is required for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. This randomised controlled study is the first to examine the efficacy of diverse orders of pedicle screw placement and will provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A randomised controlled trial with blinding of patients and the statistician, but not the clinicians and researchers, will be conducted. A total of 70 patients with single AO type A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures who are candidates for application of short-segment pedicle screws at the fractured vertebral level will be allocated randomly to the distraction-screw and screw-distraction groups at a ratio of 1:1. The primary clinical outcome measures will be the percentage loss of vertebral body height, screw depth in the injured vertebrae and kyphosis (Cobb angle). Secondary clinical outcome measures will be complications, Visual Analogue Scale scores for back and leg pain, neurological function, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and Oswestry Disability Index. These parameters will be evaluated preoperatively, intraoperatively, on postoperative day 3, and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University have reviewed and approved this study (batch: LCKY2018-05). The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at an international spine-related meeting after completion of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03384368; Pre-results.

Comparing the efficacy of short-segment pedicle screw instrumentation with and without intermediate screws for treating unstable thoracolumbar fractures

It is generally acknowledged that short-segment pedicle screw instrumentation is the preferred surgical method for thoracolumbar fractures. However, the use of short-segment instrumentation with or without intermediate screws at the fracture level remains controversial.We retrospectively evaluated 44 patients (28 men, 16 women) with unstable thoracolumbar fractures. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical method used. In group 1, 24 patients underwent surgery with a posterior approach via short-segment pedicle screw instrumentation (1 level above and 1 level below the fractured level). In group 2, 20 patients received an additional 2 screws at the fractured vertebrae. Clinical and radiologic parameters were evaluated before surgery and at 1 week, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery.We found no significant difference in the demographic characteristics between the 2 groups. No significant difference was observed in the operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the 2 groups. Clinical outcomes also showed no significant differences between the groups preoperatively or at all follow-up periods. The correction of the Cobb angle (CA) 1 week after surgery was better in group 2, whereas the anterior vertebral body height of the fractured level (AVHF) and compression ratio of the AVHF (AVHFCR) were not significantly different between the 2 groups 1 week after surgery. Moreover, group 2 had better maintenance of restored CA, AVHF, and AVHFCR at the fractured level than did group 1 at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. In addition, the reduction of mid-sagittal diameter (MSD) of spinal canal 1 week and 1 year after surgery was better in group 2. Besides, bone fragments in the spinal canal have a tendency to be less in group 2 1 week and 1 year after surgery.Reinforcement with intermediate screws for a single thoracolumbar fracture not only enhanced the stability of the internal fixation system, but it was also conducive to the correction of kyphosis and the maintenance of the reduction effects. Furthermore, this method is helpful to restore the spinal canal and reduce the bone fragments in the spinal canal. However, more long-term follow-up studies are needed.

A novel approach for biomechanical spine analysis: Mechanical response of vertebral bone augmentation by kyphoplasty to stabilise thoracolumbar burst fractures

Kyphoplasty has been shown as a well-established technique for spinal injuries. This technique allows a vertebral bone augmentation with a reduction of morbidity and does not involve any adjacent segment immobilisation. There is a lack of biomechanical information resulting in major gaps of knowledge such as: the evaluation of the "quality" of stabilisation provided by kyphoplasty as a standalone procedure in case of unstable fracture. Our objective is to analyse biomechanical response of spine segments stabilised by Kyphoplasty and PMMA cement after experiencing burst fractures. Six fresh-frozen cadaveric spine specimens constituted by five vertebra (T11-L3) and four disks were tested. A specific loading setup has been developed to impose pure moments corresponding to loadings of flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Tests were performed on each specimen in an intact state and post kyphoplasty following a burst fracture. Strain measurements and motion variations of spinal unit are measured by a 3D optical method. Strain measurements on vertebral bodies after kyphoplasty shows a great primary stabilisation. Comparisons of mobility and angles variations between the intact and post kyphoplasty states do not highlight significant difference. Percutaneous kyphoplasty offers a good primary stability in case of burst fracture. Kinematics analysis during physiological movements shows that this stabilisation solution preserve disk mobility in each adjacent spinal unit.

Outcomes After Operative Management of Combat-Related Low Lumbar Burst Fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Report the 2-year operative and clinical outcomes of these service members with low lumbar fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The majority of spinal fractures occur at the thoracolumbar level, with fractures caudal to L2 accounting for only 1% of spine fractures. A previous report from this institution regarding combat-related spine burst fractures documented an increased incidence of low lumbar burst fractures in injured service members.

METHODS

Review of inpatient and outpatient medical records in addition to radiographs for all patients treated at our institution with combat-related burst fractures occurring at the L3-L5 levels.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with a mean age of 28.1± 7.2 underwent surgery for low lumbar (L3-L5) burst fractures. The mean number of thoracolumbar levels injured was 2.9 ± 1.4. Eleven patients had neurological injury, 4 of which were complete. The mean days to surgery were 16.8 ± 24.5. The mean number of levels fused was 4.3 ± 2.1, with fixation extending to the pelvis in 4 patients (17%). Fourteen (61%) patients had at least 1 postoperative complication, with 7 (30%) requiring reoperation. Five patients had a postoperative wound infection. Five patients had deep venous thromboses, 3 had pulmonary emboli. Mean clinical follow-up was 3.3± 2.2 years. At latest follow-up, all were separated from military service, 10 experienced persistent bowel/bladder dysfunction, 15 had lower extremity motor deficits, and 10 had documented persistent low back pain. Nineteen had chronic pain with 18 patients still taking pain medications and/or muscle relaxers.

CONCLUSION

Low lumbar burst fractures are a rare injury with an increased incidence in combat casualties engaged in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. We found a high rate of acute postoperative complications (61%), as well as a high reoperation rate (30%). At approximately 3 years of follow-up, most of these patients had persistent neurological symptoms and chronic pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The analysis of functional and radiographic outcomes of conservative treatment in patients with low lumbar burst fractures

INTRODUCTION

Burst fractures of the low lumbar spine constitute approximately one percent of all lumbar fractures. There is still no consensus on the optimal treatment of low lumbar burst factures. We aimed to evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes of conservative treatment in patients with low lumbar burst fracture.

METHODS

15 patients (11 males, 4 females; mean age 32±8) who had low lumbar spine burst fracture treated with a custom-moulded thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) with a thigh extension were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 22±6 months. 14 patients were neurologically intact and one had isolated nerve root injury. There were 24% type A fractures and 76% type B fractures according to the Denis classification system. Functional outcomes were evaluated by using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Radiographic outcome was analyzed by measuring anterior vertebral height loss, kyphosis angle, amount of canal retropulsion. Functional and radiographic outcomes were reviewed initially and at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, and at the latest follow-up. Functional and radiographic improvements were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The mean bracing period was 11.9±1.7 weeks. The mean initial ODI, SF-36, and VAS score of the patients was 78.3±9.6, 23.7±8.9, and 8.7±0.7, respectively. The mean ODI, SF-36, and VAS score of the patients at the final follow-up was 26.4±6.5, 68.1±11.2, and 2.8±1.7, respectively. The improvement in functional outcomes was measured to be significant (p<0.05 for ODI, SF-36 and VAS). The mean initial anterior vertebral height loss, kyphosis angle, amount of canal retropulsion was found to be 27.2%±9.6%, -6.8°±3.2°, 37.4%±10.2%, respectively. The mean anterior vertebral height loss, kyphosis angle, and amount of canal retropulsion at the final follow-up was 23.1%±.6.7%, -4.2°±2.4°, 19.6%±7.7%, respectively. Among the radiographic outcomes, only the amount of canal retropulsion improved statistically (p=0.042).

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment using a custom-moulded thoracolumbosacral orthosis with a thigh extension is a safe and effective method in patients with low lumbar spine burst fractures and can improve functional and radiographic outcomes.

Results of treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures using pedicle instrumentation with and without fracture-level screws

BACKGROUND

Two different techniques of short-segment instrumentation, with and without a pedicle screw at the fracture level, were compared in thoracolumbar burst fractures in neurologically intact (ASIA-E) patients. The sagittal index, kyphosis angle (Cobb), canal compromise ratio, and compression ratio of the anterior vertebral height were analyzed.

METHODS

Seventy patients who underwent short-segment stabilization for thoracolumbar (T11-L2) burst fractures in our clinic between 2008 and 2012 were included in this retrospective study. In 35 patients (group 1), a pedicle screw was placed only one level down and one level up from the fracture level. In another 35 patients (group 2), a screw was placed at the fracture level in addition to the short segment. Only neurologically intact patients with burst fractures according to the Denis classification were included. The patients were evaluated according to their age/gender, trauma etiology, and fracture level. Their preoperative and most recent postoperative follow-up radiographs and CTs were evaluated in terms of the sagittal index, kyphosis angle (Cobb), ratio of canal compromise, and anterior vertebral height.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in their ages, follow-up periods, and severity of the deformity and fracture. When the pedicle screw was placed at the fracture level in addition to short-segment stabilization, statistically significant improvements in the sagittal index (p < 0.001), local kyphosis (Cobb) angle (p = 0.006), and compression ratio of the anterior vertebral height (p = 0.002) were observed. Concerning the ratio of canal compromise according to the CT findings (p = 0.189), moderate differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-segment stabilization in thoracolumbar burst fractures with additional screws at the level of the fracture results in an improved kyphosis correction, sagittal index, and compression ratio of the anterior vertebral height. However, long-term follow-up is needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings.

Evidence-based management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of nonoperative management

OBJECT

The overall evidence for nonoperative management of patients with traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures is unknown. There is no agreement on the optimal method of conservative treatment. Recent randomized controlled trials that have compared nonoperative to operative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits yielded conflicting results. By assessing the level of evidence on conservative management through validated methodologies, clinicians can assess the availability of critically appraised literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of evidence for the use of conservative management in traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the English literature over the past 20 years was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE). The inclusion criteria consisted of burst fractures resulting from a traumatic mechanism, and fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine. The exclusion criteria consisted of osteoporotic burst fractures, pathological burst fractures, and fractures located in the cervical spine. Of the studies meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, any study in which nonoperative treatment was used was included in this review.

RESULTS

One thousand ninety-eight abstracts were reviewed and 447 papers met inclusion/exclusion criteria, of which 45 were included in this review. In total, there were 2 Level-I, 7 Level-II, 9 Level-III, 25 Level-IV, and 2 Level-V studies. Of the 45 studies, 16 investigated conservative management techniques, 20 studies compared operative to nonoperative treatments, and 9 papers investigated the prognosis of conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

There are 9 high-level studies (Levels I-II) that have investigated the conservative management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. In neurologically intact patients, there is no superior conservative management technique over another as supported by a high level of evidence. The conservative technique can be based on patient and surgeon preference, comfort, and access to resources. A high level of evidence demonstrated similar functional outcomes with conservative management when compared with open surgical operative management in patients who were neurologically intact. The presence of a neurological deficit is not an absolute contraindication for conservative treatment as supported by a high level of evidence. However, the majority of the literature excluded patients with neurological deficits. More evidence is needed to further classify the appropriate burst fractures for conservative management to decrease variables that may impact the prognosis.

Anterior D-rod and titanium mesh fixation for acute mid-lumbar burst fracture with incomplete neurologic deficits: A prospective study of 56 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Anterior decompression and reconstruction have gained wide acceptance as viable alternatives for unstable mid-lumbar burst fracture, but there are no mid and long term prospective studies regarding clinical and radiologic results of mid-lumbar burst fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study of 56 consecutive patients of mid-lumbar burst fractures with a load-sharing score of 7 or more treated with anterior plating was carried out. All patients were evaluated for radiologic and clinical outcomes. The fusion status, spinal canal compromise, segmental kyphotic angle (SKA), vertebral body height loss (VBHL), and adjacent segment degeneration was examined for radiologic outcome, whereas the American Spinal Injury Association scale, the visual analog scale (VAS), and the employment status were used for clinical evaluation.

RESULTS

The patients underwent clinical and radiologic followup for at least 5 years after the surgery. At the last followup, there was no case of internal fixation failure, adjacent segment degeneration, and other complications. Interbody fusion was achieved in all cases. The average fusion time was 4.5 months. No patient suffered neurological deterioration and the average neurologic recovery was 1.3 grades on final observation. Based on VAS pain scores, canal compromise, percentage of VBHL and SKA, the difference was statistically significant between the preoperative period and postoperative or final followup (P < 0.05). Results at postoperative and final followup were better than the preoperative period. However, the difference was not significant between postoperative and final followup (P > 0.05). Thirty-four patients who were employed before the injury returned to work after the operation, 15 had changed to less strenuous work.

CONCLUSION

Good mid term clinicoradiological results of anterior decompression with D-rod and titanium mesh fixation for suitable patients with mid-lumbar burst fractures with incomplete neurologic deficits can be achieved. The incident rate of complications was low. D-rod is a reliable implant and has some potential advantages in L4 vertebral fractures.

Expectations of recovery and functional outcomes following thoracolumbar trauma: an evidence-based medicine process to determine what surgeons should be telling their patients

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to define the expected functional and health-related quality of life outcomes following common thoracolumbar injuries on the basis of consensus expert opinion and the best available literature. Patient expectations are primarily determined by the information provided by health care professionals, and these expectations have been shown to influence outcome in various medical and surgical conditions. This paper presents Part 2 of a multiphase study designed to investigate the impact of patient expectations on outcomes following spinal injury. Part 1 demonstrated substantial variability in the information surgeons are communicating to patients. Defining the expected outcomes following thoracolumbar injury would allow further analysis of this relationship and enable surgeons to more accurately and consistently inform patients.

METHODS

Expert opinion was assembled by distributing questionnaires comprising 4 cases representative of common thoracolumbar injuries to members of the Spine Trauma Study Group (STSG). The 4 cases included a thoracolumbar junction burst fracture treated nonoperatively or with posterior transpedicular instrumentation, a low lumbar (L-4) burst fracture treated nonoperatively, and a thoracolumbar junction flexion-distraction injury managed with posterior fusion. For each case, 5 questions about expected outcomes were posed. The questions related to the proportion of patients who are pain free, the proportion who have regained full range of motion, and the patients' recreational activity restrictions and personal care and social life limitations, all at 1 year following injury, as well as the timing of return to work and length of hospital stay. Responses were analyzed and combined with the results of a systematic literature review on the same injuries to define the expected outcomes.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 38 appropriate studies that met the preset inclusion criteria. Published data were available for all injuries, but not all outcomes were available for each type of injury. The survey was completed by 31 (57%) of 53 surgeons representing 24 trauma centers across North America (15), Europe (5), India (1), Mexico (1), Japan (1) and Israel (1). Consensus expert opinion supplemented the available literature and was used exclusively when published data were lacking. For example, 1 year following cast or brace treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture, the expected outcomes include a 40% chance of being pain free, a 70% chance of regaining pre-injury range of motion, and an expected ability to participate in high-impact exercise and contact sport with no or minimal limitation. Consensus expert opinion predicts reemployment within 4-6 months. The length of inpatient stay averages 4-5 days.

CONCLUSIONS

This synthesis of the best available literature and consensus opinion of surgeons with extensive clinical experience in spine trauma reflects the optimal methodology for determining functional prognosis after thoracolumbar trauma. By providing consistent, accurate information surgeons will help patients develop realistic expectations and potentially optimize outcomes.

Neurological L5 burst fracture: posterior decompression and lordotic fixation as treatment of choice

PURPOSE

We report our experience and literature review concerning surgical treatment of neurological burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with L5 neurological burst fractures were consecutively enrolled; 6 patients had complete motor deficits, and 12 had sphincter dysfunction. We performed 18 posterior and one combined approaches. To avoid kyphosis, posterior internal fixation was achieved by positioning patients on the operating table with hips and knees fully extended. At the latest follow-up (mean 22 months, range 10-66), neurological recovery, canal remodeling and L4-S1 angle were evaluated.

RESULTS

Vertebral body replacement was difficult, which therefore resulted in an oblique position of the cage. Vertebral bodies still remained deformed, even though fixation allowed for an acceptable profile (22°, range 20-35). We observed three cases of paralysis, five complete, and three incomplete recoveries. In the remaining eight patients, sphincter impairment was the only finding. In 15 patients, pain was absent or occasional; in four individuals, it was continuous but not invalidating. Remodeling was visible by X-ray and/or CT, without significant secondary stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The L5 burst fractures are rare and mostly due to axial compression. Cauda and/or nerve root injuries are absolute indications for surgery. If an anterior approach is technically difficult, laminectomy can allow for decompression, and it can be easily combined with transpedicular screw fixation. Posterior instrumented fusion, also performed with the aim to restore sagittal profile, when associated with an accurate spinal canal exploration and decompression, may be looked at as an optimal treatment for neurological L5 burst fractures.

Screw Fixation without Fusion for Low Lumbar Burst Fracture : A Severe Canal Compromise But Neurologically Intact Case

The low lumbar spine is deeply located in flexible segments, and has a physiologic lordosis. Therefore, burst fractures of the low lumbar spine are uncommon injuries. The treatment for such injuries may either be conservative or surgical management according to canal compromise and the neurological status. However, there are no general guidelines or consensus for the treatment of low lumbar burst fractures especially in neurologically intact cases with severe canal compromise. We report a patient with a burst fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra, who was treated surgically but without fusion because of the neurologically intact status in spite of severe canal compromise of more than 85%. It was possible to preserve motion segments by removal of screws at one year later. We also discuss why bone fusion was not necessary with review of the relevant literature.

Estudio comparativo del tratamiento ortésico en las fracturas toraco-lumbosacras según la gravedad del trauma

OBJETIVO: Determinar si la gravedad del trauma en lesiones toracolumbosacras mayores estables permite decidir la selección del tipo de ortesis en un tratamiento ortopédico. MÉTODOS: Estudio Retrospectivo de casos 12/1990 - 12/2006 (16 años). Criterios de Selección: 1) Seguimiento mínimo: 2 años. 2) Estudios radiológicos convencionales completos. 3) Ausencia de Litigio. 4) Tratamiento ortésico con TLSO a medida para los traumas de alta energía cinética y con ortesis prefabricadas para los de baja energía. 5) Tratamiento efectuado o supervisado por el autor Sénior. Evaluación por observadores independientes de Parámetros Geométricos (ángulo de Cobb sagital, cifosis vertebral, grado de colapso vertebral) pretratamiento y seguimiento en Rx simple, y Parámetros Funcionales (Dolor según SRS, Índice de Oswestry, Retorno a la Actividad Previa). Subdivisión de los diferentes tipos de fracturas (según AO y Denis) en Alta (Grupo A) y Baja Energía [Grupo B] de acuerdo con la energía cinética del trauma. Comparación de Parámetros Geométricos con Grupo Control. Análisis Estadístico: chi cuadrado y t-test de Student. RESULTADOS: 41 pacientes (44 fracturas] tratados (23 mujeres/18 varones), con 25 fracturas Grupo "A", y 19 Grupo "B". Edad promedio: 46 años (12 - 83). Seguimiento promedio: 4,5 años (2.2 - 15.5). Localización predominante: T11 - L2. Tipos Predominantes: tipo A (AO) o por compresión y por estallido. No hubo diferencias significativas en las mediciones efectuadas en cada grupo pretratamiento y al seguimiento. La única diferencia significativa entre grupos fue en la cifosis vertebral inicial tanto en general como según la clasificación AO entre los tipos A de alta y baja energía. La comparación al seguimiento de los parámetros geométricos entre grupo control y grupos A y B así como entre grupo control y cada tipo (AO/Denis) subdivididos en alta o baja energía, arrojó siempre diferencias significativas. Los parámetros funcionales al seguimiento mostraron siempre puntuaciones promedio buenas, con variaciones significativas entre grupos A y B. El retorno a la actividad previa fue del 90,6%, sin diferencias entre trabajadores de esfuerzo físico y de escritorio. CONCLUSIONES: Es posible lograr un Resultado Clínico Funcional satisfactorio a mediano plazo en las lesiones toracolumbosacras mayores estables seleccionando el tipo de ortesis según que el trauma sea de alta o baja energía cinética. Los resultados clínicos funcionales parecen ser mejores en los casos de Trauma de Alta Energía. Sin embargo, este tratamiento no mejora ni empeora los parámetros radiológicos sagitales.

Burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Burst fractures are rare in the pediatric population. There is limited information available on the best treatment for these injuries. The aims of our study were to evaluate the risk of spinal cord injury (SCI) and the potential for neurologic recovery associated with pediatric burst fractures; to compare sagittal alignment between nonoperative and operative treatment; and to determine whether functional outcomes are improved after surgery.

METHODS

All pediatric patients who sustained thoracic or lumbar burst fractures at 2 institutions between 1991 and 2005 were identified. The medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, injury, treatment, and outcomes. Health Survey data were collected from a subset of patients in both the operative and nonoperative groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 17 male patients and 20 female patients, with an average age of 14.6 years (range, 6 to 18 y). Nine patients were treated nonoperatively and 28 patients were treated operatively. The nonoperative group was treated with hyperextension casting or bracing and showed progression of kyphotic deformity from 16.1 degrees at injury to 23.1 degrees at final follow-up. In patients treated operatively, the kyphotic deformity improved from 17.1 degrees at presentation to 7.2 degrees at final follow-up. Twenty-four patients were neurologically intact at presentation, whereas 13 presented with neurologic deficit. Six of 13 patients with SCI had some improvement. The risk of SCI was highest in patients with thoracic-level fractures. The risk of SCI did not correlate with canal compromise. There were no significant differences in functional outcome between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of neurologic injury in pediatric burst fractures of the spine may be more closely related to the level of injury (thoracic) than the degree of spinal canal compromise. Prognosis for recovery of neurologic injury is related to the severity of the initial neurologic injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level 2.

Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures by indirect reduction and posterior stabilization: short-segment versus long-segment stabilization

In order to compare short-segment stabilization with long-segment stabilization for treating unstable thoracolumbar fractures, we studied fifty patients suffered from unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Thirty of them were managed with long-segment posterior transpedicular instrumentation and twenty patients with short-segment stabilization. The mean follow up period was 5.2 years. Pre-operative and post-operative radiological parameters, like the Cobb angle, the kyphotic deformation and the Beck index were evaluated. A statistically significant difference between the two under study groups was noted for the Cobb angle and the kyphotic deformation, while, as far as the Beck index is concerned, no significant difference was noted. In conclusion, either the long-segment or the short-segment stabilization is able for reducing the segmental kyphosis and the vertebral body deformation postoperatively. However, as time goes by, the long-segment stabilization is associated with better results as far as the radiological parameters, the indexes and the patient’s satisfaction are concerned.

Fratura da coluna vertebral tipo explosão na área da cauda eqüina: correlação entre função neurológica e alterações estruturais no canal vertebral

OBJETIVO: Avaliar se há correlação entre o estreitamento traumático do canal vertebral e as possíveis fraturas associadas da lâmina, com o quadro neurológico inicial dos pacientes com fratura tipo explosão na área da cauda eqüina. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma revisão retrospectiva de 42 pacientes que apresentaram 43 fraturas tipo explosão de L3, L4 e L5, no período compreendido entre janeiro de 1990 a dezembro de 2004. Os resultados foram avaliados de acordo com a disfunção neurológica inicial e o diâmetro sagital médio do canal vertebral acometido. RESULTADOS: A única variável preditiva independente do comprometimento neurológico foi o estreitamento do canal vertebral (p = 0,008). A porcentagem média de estreitamento do canal vertebral foi significativamente (p < 0,001) maior nos casos em que havia a fratura da lâmina associada. Porém, na análise múltipla, verificou-se que a fratura da lâmina não é um fator preditivo independente para que ocorra a lesão neurológica. CONCLUSÃO: O estreitamento do canal vertebral, causado pelo fragmento ósseo da fratura, com ou sem a associação de fraturas da lâmina, nas fraturas tipo explosão na área da cauda eqüina, tem correlação direta e estatisticamente significativa com a alteração da função neurológica.

Combined anterior plus posterior stabilization versus posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion for mid-lumbar (L2-L4) burst fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized study. OBJECTIVES.: To compare the results of the combined anterior-posterior surgery (Group A) with posterior "short-segment" transpedicular fixation (SSTF) (Group B) in mid-lumbar burst fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are no comparative randomized clinical studies on the outcome following operative treatment of mid-lumbar fractures.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients with L2-L4 fresh single A3-type/AO burst fractures and load sharing score up to 6 were randomly selected to underwent either combined one-stage anterior stabilization with mesh cage and SSTF (Group A) or solely SSTF with intermediate screws in the fractured vertebra (Group B). Kyphotic Gardner angle, anterior and posterior vertebral body height (PVBHr, AVBHr), spinal canal encroachment (SCE), SF-36, VAS, and Frankel classification were used.

RESULTS

The follow-up observation averaged 46 and 48 months for Group A and B, respectively. Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significant more in Group A. More surgical complications were observed in the Group A. After surgery, VAS was reduced to 4.3 and 3.6 for Group A and Group B, respectively. The SF-36 domains Role physical and Bodily pain improved significantly only in Group B (P = 0.05) and (P = 0.06), respectively. Correction of AVBHr, PVBHr, and spinal canal clearance was similar in both groups. Spinal canal clearance did not differ between the two groups, but it was continuous until the last evaluation in Group B. The final Gardner angle loss of correction averaged 2 degrees and 5 degrees for Group A and Group B, respectively. The posttraumatic Gardner deformity did not significantly improve by SSTF at the final evaluation in the spines of Group B. Gardner angle correlated significantly with SCE in Group B and Group A in all three periods and in the last evaluation, respectively. Frankel grade did not correlate with loss of correction of AVBHr and PVBHr in Group A, while it significantly correlated with loss of PVBHr correction and SCE in the patients of Group B. There was no neurologic deterioration after surgery in any patient. VAS and SF-36 scores did not significantly correlate with the loss of kyphotic angle correction and AVBHr, PVBHr at the final observation in any patient of both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SSTF offered similar significant short-term correction of posttraumatic deformities associated with mid-lumbar A3-burst fractures, but better clinical results as compared to combined surgery. However, SSTF did not significantly maintain the after surgery achieved correction of local posttraumatic kyphosis at the final evaluation. Thus, SSTF is not recommended for operative stabilization of fractures with this severity.

Posterior Fixation of Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture is a controversial issue. Short-segment (SS) pedicle fixation has become a popular treatment option. However, there are several studies regarding the high rate of failure. The aim of this prospective study was to compare SS versus long-segment (LS) instrumentation.

METHODS

For this purpose, 18 consecutive patients were assigned to two groups. Group 1 included nine patients treated by SS pedicle fixation, whereas group 2 included nine patients treated by LS instrumentation. SS instrumentation was pedicle fixation one level above and below the fractured vertebra. LS instrumentation was hook fixation (claw hooks attached to second upper vertebra and infralaminar hooks attached to first upper vertebra) above and pedicle fixation (pedicle screws attached to first and second lower vertebrae) below the fractured vertebra.

RESULTS

As a result, measurements of local kyphosis, sagittal index, and anterior vertebral height compression showed that the LS group had a better outcome at final follow-up (P < 0.05). Also, the SS group had a 55% failure rate, whereas the LS group had prolonged operative time and increased blood loss. However, there was no difference between the two groups according to Low Back Outcome Score.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, radiographic parameters demonstrated that LS instrumentation is a more effective management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Nevertheless, clinical outcome was the same between the two groups. However, our conclusions were based on posterior-only surgery. Anterior column support would negate the need for LS fixation. Also, SS would have been more successful if two above and two below pedicle screws were used.

Minimally Incisional Stabilization of Unstable L5 Burst Fracture

BACKGROUND

Burst fractures of the L5 vertebral body are uncommon. Treatment options described include prolonged immobilization and surgical stabilization, most commonly with an instrumented fusion from L4 to the sacrum.

METHODS

We describe the use of a minimally incisional technique to provide temporary internal fixation in a patient with an L5 burst fracture who was not a candidate for prolonged immobilization.

RESULTS

This technique resulted in an excellent outcome without the requirement for a fusion.

CONCLUSION

Minimally incisional fixation procedures are a treatment option for select patients with L5 burst fractures.

Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with Variable Screw Placement or Isola Instrumentation and Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

The controversy of burst fracture surgical management is addressed in this retrospective case study and literature review.

METHODS

The series consisted of 40 consecutive patients, index included, with 41 fractures treated with stiff, limited segment transpedicular bone-anchored instrumentation and arthrodesis from 1987 through 1994.

RESULTS

No major acute complications such as death, paralysis, or infection occurred. For the 30 fractures with pre- and postoperative computed tomography studies, spinal canal compromise was 61% and 32%, respectively. Neurologic function improved in 7 of 14 patients (50%) and did not worsen in any. The principal problem encountered was screw breakage, which occurred in 16 of the 41 (39%) instrumented fractures. As we have previously reported, transpedicular anterior bone graft augmentation significantly decreased variable screw placement (VSP) implant breakage. However, it did not prevent Isola implant breakage in two-motion segment constructs. Compared with VSP, Isola provided better sagittal plane realignment and constructs that have been found to be significantly stiffer. Unplanned reoperation was necessary in 9 of the 40 patients (23%). At 1- and 2-year follow-up, 95% and 79% of patients were available for study, and a satisfactory outcome was achieved in 84% and 79%, respectively. These satisfaction and reoperation rates are consistent with the literature of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these observations and the loads to which implant constructs are exposed following posterior realignment and stabilization of burst fractures, we recommend that three- or four-motion segment constructs, rather than two motion, be used. To save valuable motion segments, planned construct shortening can be used. An alternative is sequential or staged anterior corpectomy and structural grafting.

Low lumbar spinal fractures: management options

Fifty-four patients with low lumbar spinal fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, there were 25 compression fractures, 21 burst fractures, three flexion-distraction fractures and five fracture-dislocations. Three patients had a complete neurological lesion, 17 sustained an incomplete neurological injury, and 34 were neurologically intact. Twenty-six patients were treated non-operatively and 28 underwent surgery. All patients were followed up for l-12 years. Forty-three patients (79.6%) have returned to their former employment or activity level. Four patients had experienced significant improvement but suffered from some limitation of activity. Five patients were unable to stand up and walk without support although they had some degree of improvement. Two remained completely paralyzed. There were no differences in neurologic function between patients treated non-operatively or operatively (P>0.05). The patients treated operatively had significantly less pain compared to the patients treated non-operatively (P<0.01). Because of the unique anatomy and biomechanics, fractures of the low lumbar spine are different from those in the remaining regions of spine. Most compression fractures are stable, and therefore conservative management is indicated. Surgery should be performed in those with burst fractures or flexion-distraction fractures, with severe spinal stenosis or kyphotic deformity, and fracture-dislocation.

Health-related quality of life after short segment instrumentation of lumbar burst fractures

Management of lumbar burst fractures remains controversial. Surgical reduction/stabilization is becoming more popular; however, the functional impact of operative intervention is not clear. The purpose of this study was to assess health-related quality of life and functional outcome after posterior fixation of lumbar burst fractures with either posterolateral or intrabody bone grafting. Twenty-four subjects were included. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were evaluated for deformity (kyphosis, vertebral compression, lateral angulation, lateral body height, and canal compromise) postoperatively, at 1 year, and at final follow-up (mean 3.2 years). Patients completed the SF 36 Health Survey and the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at final follow-up. Significant improvement was noted in midsagittal diameter compromise, vertebral compression, and kyphosis. The difference observed between the respondents mean scores on the SF 36 was not significantly different from those presented as the U.S. national average (p = 0.053). Data from the Oswestry questionnaire indicated a similarly high level of function. Overall, we found posterior spinal instrumentation to correlate with positive functional outcome based on both general health (SF 36) and joint-specific outcome scales (Oswestry). Posterior instrumentation provides sound canal decompression, kyphotic reduction, and maintains vertebral height with minimal transgression and long-term sequelae. In cases of severe initial deformity and neurologic compromise, intrabody bone grafting is most certainly indicated; the additional support provided by a posterolateral graft may also prove beneficial as an adjunct.

Functional outcome of low lumbar burst fractures. A multicenter review of operative and nonoperative treatment of L3-L5

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of 42 patients treated at three major medical centers for burst fractures of L3, L4, and L5. This is the largest low lumbar (L3-L5) burst fracture study in the literature to date. The study was designed to assess both radiographic and clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients treated during a 16-year period.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine whether conservatively treated patients with low lumbar burst fractures had satisfactory outcomes compared with those in a surgically treated cohort of patients. The study included patients with and without neurologic deficits.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Burst fractures of the low lumbar spine (L3-L5) represent a small percentage of all spine fractures. The iliolumbar ligaments and location below the pelvic brim are two stabilizing factors that are unique to these fractures when compared with burst fractures at the thoracolumbar junction.

METHODS

Forty-two (n = 42) patients with low lumbar burst fractures were identified from 1980 through 1996. Medical records, radiographs, and follow-up Dallas Pain Questionnaires were obtained. Loss of anterior vertebral height, kyphotic angulation, and amount of retropulsion were recorded at several phases of treatment. Mean follow-up time was 45.2 months (range, 5-132 months). Twenty patients were treated without surgery (18 were neurologically intact, and 2 had isolated nerve root injury), and 22 underwent surgery (14 had neurologic injury, 8 were intact).

RESULTS

No patient showed neurologic deterioration, regardless of treatment. Fracture of the third lumbar segment showed the greatest tendency toward kyphotic collapse and loss of height in the nonoperative group, although this was not reflected in the final functional outcome of both groups. The ability to return to work and achieve a good-to-excellent long-term result was not significantly different among fracture levels or between surgical and nonsurgical treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of nonoperative treatment of low lumbar burst fractures were comparable with those of operative treatment. The rate of repeat surgery (41%) and absence of a clearly definable long-term functional or radiographic benefit in patients without neurologic compromise may make surgery less appealing.