Chylothorax after video-assisted thoracoscopic release for rigid scoliosis

Anterior-only approaches to scoliosis

Scoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity for which surgery may be indicated when patients experience severe pain, curve progression, or progressive disability. Operative treatment has conventionally involved extensive posterior stabilization, either alone or in combination with anterior release procedures. Anterior-only approaches have a more limited role, but they should be considered in the appropriate setting when addressing this disease. Some advantages of anterior-only approaches to scoliosis include greater corrective ability with a greater fusion rate while mandating fewer motion segments to be involved in the instrumented construct. Preventing denervation of the posterior paraspinal musculature is also desirable and is inherently provided for by the anterior approach. Disadvantages include pulmonary morbidity associated with violating the thoracic cavity, as well as post-thoracotomy chronic pain. There are also limitations in the indications for which anterior-only surgery can be performed, and these will be discussed along with treatment options. Technological advances, including minimally invasive thoracic access as well as evolving instrumentation, may minimize the stated disadvantages and expand the scope of scoliosis cases that may be treated by anterior-only approaches. Hence, the enhanced corrective ability and biomechanical advantages of the anterior column can be used in the treatment of these patients. Although the indications for anterior-only strategies in scoliosis remain limited, such operations should be considered in the appropriate setting when addressing spinal deformity.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation of the learning curve

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent same-day or staged anterior and posterior spinal fusion and segmental spinal instrumentation.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of our learning curve with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with respect to operative time, blood loss, and complications in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

VATS is a minimally invasive alternative to thoracotomy in the management of idiopathic scoliosis. An increased or steep learning curve has been described in the initial application of this technique.

METHODS

We began performing VATS in 1998. We compared our first 25 consecutive VATS patients (Group 2) and subsequent 28 consecutive VATS patients (Group 3) to our previous 16 consecutive patients (Group 1) with a thoracotomy (1991-1998) for idiopathic scoliosis. Training at a sponsored regional course was obtained before performing our first VATS procedure.

RESULTS

VATS allowed more disc to be excised in Group 2 (4.5 +/- 1, 5.7 +/- 1, and 4.4 +/- 1 discs in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively) and significantly decreased the anterior operative time (215 +/- 33, 260 +/- 56, and 177 +/- 47 minutes) and time per individual disc excision (50 +/- 13, 47 +/- 12, and 41 +/- 12 minutes), while providing comparable correction of the thoracic deformity (67% +/- 12%, 66% +/- 10%, and 70% +/- 13% correction). There was no increase in estimated intraoperative anterior blood loss (228 +/- 213, 183 +/- 136, and 211 +/- 158 mL), estimated blood loss per disc excised (51 +/- 42, 34 +/- 29 and 48 +/- 37 mL), or complications in the VATS groups. Complications were primarily pulmonary and resolved with medical therapy. Postoperative chest tube drainage (855 +/- 397, 462 +/- 249, and 561 +/- 261 mL) and total perioperative anterior blood loss (1083 +/- 507, 647 +/- 309, and 773 +/- 308 mL) were significantly decreased in the VATS groups, but this was attributed to the use of Amicar.

CONCLUSIONS

VATS is an effective procedure for anterior spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. The learning curve is short, provided appropriate training is obtained.