Latent pisotriquetral arthrosis unmasked following carpal tunnel release

Pillar Pain After Minimally Invasive and Standard Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose

Pillar pain is a recognized postoperative complication of carpal tunnel release (CTR). Minimally invasive and alternative surgical techniques can theoretically prevent pillar pain, and the aim of this review was to compare the incidence of pillar pain after standard open CTR and alternative surgical techniques.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were thoroughly searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive surgical techniques to standard open CTR were identified. Data, including surgical technique, number of hands, incidence of pillar pain, and follow-up intervals, were extracted. Odds ratios (OR) were expressed as pillar pain incidence in the intervention group relative to standard open CTR.

Results

There were 12 studies included. No statistically significant differences were noted among endoscopic (OR = 0.53, P = .20), flexor retinaculum lengthening (OR = 1.00, P = 1.00), short incision (OR = 0.41, P = .07) or illuminated knife techniques (OR = 0.18, P = .16). There was a statistically significant decrease in pillar pain after minimally invasive CTR (OR = 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.86, I2 = 0%, P = .02) between 3- and 6-months follow-up; however, analyses at all other follow-up periods failed to reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

Although our findings suggest that standard open CTR may be associated with an increased duration of pillar pain between 3 and 6 months postoperatively, our results suggest that minimally invasive CTR techniques do not affect either the initial development or persistence of pillar pain.

Clinical relevance

Our results illustrate the natural history of pillar pain with the majority of cases resolving after 6 months, highlighting the utility of symptomatic and conservative treatments and patient education in the management of pillar pain.

Treatment of Intractable Pillar Pain With Excision of the Hook of Hamate

Introduction: A common consequence of carpal tunnel release (CTR) is ulnar palmar pain termed pillar pain. Some (very rare) patients do not improve with conservative treatment. We have been treating recalcitrant pain with excision of hook of the hamate. Our purpose was to evaluate a series of patients undergoing excision of the hook of the hamate for post CTR pillar pain. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing hook of hamate excisions over a 30-year period was performed. Data collected included: gender, hand dominance, age, time-to-intervention, preoperative and post-operative pain scores, and insurance. Results: Fifteen patients were included with a mean age of 49 (range 18-68) years, 7 female (47%). Twelve (80%) of the patients were right handed. Mean time between CTR and excision hook of hamate was 7.4 months (range 1-18 months). Pain prior to surgery was 5.44 (range 2-10). Post-operative pain was 2.44 (range 0-8). Mean follow-up was 4.7 months (range 1-19 months). Patients with a good clinical outcome were 14 (93%). Conclusions: Excision of hook of hamate seems to provide clinical improvement in patients who remain painful despite exhaustive conservative treatment. It may be considered as a very last resort for persistent pillar pain after CTR.

Complications of Carpal Tunnel Release

Carpal tunnel release for compression of the median nerve at the wrist is one of the most common and successful procedures in hand surgery. Complications, though rare, are potentially devastating and may include intraoperative technical errors, postoperative infection and pain, and persistent or recurrent symptoms. Patients with continued complaints after carpal tunnel release should be carefully evaluated with detailed history and physical examination in addition to electrodiagnostic testing. For those with persistent or recurrent symptoms, a course of nonoperative management including splinting, injections, occupational therapy, and desensitization should be considered prior to revision surgery.

Complications of compressive neuropathy: prevention and management strategies

Compressive neuropathies of the upper extremity are common and can result in profound disability if left untreated. Nerve releases are frequently performed, but can be complicated by both iatrogenic events and progression of neuropathy. In this review, we examine the management of postoperative complications after 2 common nerve compression release procedures: carpal tunnel release and cubital tunnel release.

The pisotriquetral joint: osteoarthritis and enthesopathy

Pisotriquetral (PT) osteoarthritis (OA) and enthesopathy of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) are pathologies of the hypothenar eminence which both often remain undiagnosed, but can cause ulnar wrist pain. This study determined the prevalence of these pathologies in an older donor population. Twenty wrists were obtained from 10 cadavers with an age ranging from 65 to 94 years. Radiographs were taken of all wrists with the hand in pisotriquetral view and were assessed for osteoarthritic changes of the PT joint and signs of enthesopathy of the FCU. Ten wrists were grossly dissected and the other ten wrists were sagitally sectioned at a thickness of 10 μm. The wrists were analyzed for type and grade of osteoarthritis and signs of enthesopathy. On radiology, 2 out of 20 wrists showed no signs of osteoarthritis, 5 wrists showed severe changes. One wrist showed signs of enthesopathy. On macroscopy, 9 out of 10 wrists showed osteoartritic changes; 5 of these were severely osteoarthritic. On microscopy, all wrists showed some degree of osteoarthritis of which five showed severe changes. Signs of enthesopathy were seen in seven wrists. Pisotriquetral osteoarthritis has a high prevalence in the older donor population and may therefore be a cause of ulnar sided wrist pain. It should therefore always be considered in the differential diagnosis of ulnar sided wrist pain. By performing clinical examination with these pathologies in mind, diagnosis could be a lot faster. Furthermore, based on our results, radiographs seem to be not accurate in diagnosing osteoarthritis of the PT joint and enthesopathy of the FCU.