Intraoperative fluid therapy and pulmonary complications

The Optimal Fluid Strategy Matters in Liver Surgery: A Retrospective Single Centre Analysis of 666 Consecutive Liver Resections

As optimal intraoperative fluid management in liver surgery has not been established, we retrospectively analyzed our fluid strategy in a high-volume liver surgery center in 666 liver resections. Intraoperative fluid management was divided into very restrictive (<10 m kg^-1 h^-1) and normal (≥10 mL kg^-1 h^-1) groups for study group characterization. The primary endpoint was morbidity as assessed by the Clavien-Dindo (CD) score and the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Logistic regression models identified factors most predictive of postoperative morbidity. No association was found between postoperative morbidity and fluid management in the overall study population (p = 0.89). However, the normal fluid management group had shorter postoperative hospital stays (p = <0.001), shorter ICU stays (p = 0.035), and lower in-hospital mortality (p = 0.02). Elevated lactate levels (p < 0.001), duration (p < 0.001), and extent of surgery (p < 0.001) were the most predictive factors for postoperative morbidity. In the subgroup of major/extreme liver resection, very low total (p = 0.028) and normalized fluid balance (p = 0.025) (NFB) were associated with morbidity. Moreover, fluid management was not associated with morbidity in patients with normal lactate levels (<2.5 mmol/L). In conclusion, fluid management in liver surgery is multifaceted and must be applied judiciously as a therapeutic measure. While a restrictive strategy appears attractive, hypovolemia should be avoided.

Comparison of restrictive fluid therapy with goal-directed fluid therapy for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common phenomenon after spinal surgery. Intraoperative fluid management may affect POD. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of restrictive fluid therapy (RF) with those of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDT) on POD.

Methods

A total of 195 patients aged ≥ 50 years who underwent spinal surgery were randomly divided into two groups: the RF group and the GDT group. In group RF, a bolus of lactated Ringer’s solution was administered at a dose of 5 mL·kg^-1 before the induction of anesthesia, followed by a dose of 5 mL·kg^-1·h^-1 until the end of surgery. For patients in the GDT group, in addition to the initial administration of lactated Ringer’s solution at 5 mL·kg^-1, the subsequent fluid therapy was adjusted by using a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP) monitoring system to maintain pulse pressure variation (PPV) ≤ 14%. The primary endpoint was the incidence of POD, assessed once daily with the Confusion Assessment Method-Chinese Reversion (CAM-CR) scale at 1–3 days postoperatively. The secondary endpoints were intraoperative fluid infusion volume, urine volume, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO₂) value, lactic acid value, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 1–3 days after surgery. Moreover, postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay were recorded.

Results

The incidence of POD was lower in the GDT group than in the RF group (12.4% vs 4.1%; P = 0.035) in the first 3 days after spine surgery. Compared to group RF, group GDT exhibited a significantly increased volume of intraoperative lactated Ringer’s solution [1500 (interquartile range: 1128 to 1775) mL vs 1000 (interquartile range: 765 to 1300) mL, P < 0.001] and urine volume [398 (interquartile range: 288 to 600) mL vs 300 (interquartile range: 200 to 530) mL, P = 0.012]. Intraoperative MAP, CI and rSO₂ values were higher in the GDT group than in the RF group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the length of hospital stay [17.0 (14 to 20) days versus 14.5 (13 to 17.0) days, P = 0.001] was shorter in the GDT group than in the RF group.

Conclusions

GDT reduced the incidence of POD in middle- and old-aged patients undergoing spinal surgery possibly by stabilizing perioperative hemodynamic and improving the supply and demand of oxygen.

Trial registration

ChiCTR2000032603; Registered on May 3, 2020.

Perioperative management of spinal cord injury: the anesthesiologist's point of view

BACKGROUND

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most devastating events a person can experience. It may be life-threatening or result in long-term disability. This narrative review aims to delineate a systematic step-wise airways, breathing, circulation and disability (ABCD) approach to perioperative patient management during spinal cord surgery in order to fill some of the gaps in our current knowledge.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the perioperative management of traumatic spinal injuries from May 15, 2020, to December 13, 2020. We consulted the PubMed and Embase database libraries.

RESULTS

Videolaryngoscopy supplements the armamentarium available for airway management. Optical fiberscope use should be evaluated when intubating awake patients. Respiratory complications are frequent in the acute phase of traumatic spinal injury, with an estimated incidence of 36-83%. Early tracheostomy can be considered for expected difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation. Careful intraoperative management of administered fluids should be pursued to avoid complications from volume overload. Neuromonitoring requires investments in staff training and cooperation, but better outcomes have been obtained in centers where it is routinely applied. The prone position can cause rare but devastating complications, such as ischemic optic neuropathy; thus, the anesthetist should take the utmost care in positioning the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

A one-size fit all approach to spinal surgery patients is not applicable due to patient heterogeneity and the complexity of the procedures involved. The neurologic outcome of spinal surgery can be improved, and the incidence of complications reduced with better knowledge of patient-specific aspects and individualized perioperative management.

Pathway for enhanced recovery after spinal surgery-a systematic review of evidence for use of individual components

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery in spinal surgery (ERSS) has shown promising improvements in clinical and economical outcomes. We have proposed an ERSS pathway based on available evidence. We aimed to delineate the clinical efficacy of individual pathway components in ERSS through a systematic narrative review.

METHODS

We included systematic reviews and meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled studies, and observational studies in adults and pediatric patients evaluating any one of the 22 pre-defined components. Our primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, morbidity outcomes (e.g., pulmonary, cardiac, renal, surgical complications), patient-reported outcomes and experiences (e.g., pain, quality of care experience), and health services outcomes (e.g., length of stay and costs). Following databases (1990 onwards) were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL). Two authors screened the citations, full-text articles, and extracted data. A narrative synthesis was provided. We constructed Evidence Profile (EP) tables for each component of the pathway, where appropriate information was available. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we did not conduct a meta-analyses. GRADE system was used to classify confidence in cumulative evidence for each component of the pathway.

RESULTS

We identified 5423 relevant studies excluding duplicates as relating to the 22 pre-defined components of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery. We included 664 studies in the systematic review. We identified specific evidence within the context of spinal surgery for 14/22 proposed components. Evidence was summarized in EP tables where suitable. We performed thematic synthesis without EP for 6/22 elements. We identified appropriate societal guidelines for the remainder of the components.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the following components with high quality of evidence as per GRADE system: pre-emptive analgesia, peri-operative blood conservation (antifibrinolytic use), surgical site preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis. There was moderate level of evidence for implementation of prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery, multimodal perioperative analgesia, intravenous lignocaine and ketamine use as well as early mobilization. This review allows for the first formalized evidence-based unified protocol in the field of ERSS. Further studies validating the multimodal ERSS framework are essential to guide the future evolution of care in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following 3-Column Spinal Osteotomies in Pediatric Patients

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES

Length of stay (LOS) is one of the important indicators for the quality of patient care. Although perioperative complications are known to be associated with longer LOS in general, little has been understood regarding LOS after 3-column spinal osteotomy for the rigid spinal deformity in pediatric population. The main objective of the article is to identify factors affecting the LOS in pediatric patients undergoing 3-column posterior spinal osteotomies.

METHODS

Following research ethics approval, a retrospective review was performed of 35 consecutive posterior 3-column spinal osteotomies performed on pediatric patients in a single academic institution. Patients' demographic data, preoperative comorbidities, details of operative procedures, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications were investigated, and LOS was compared among the groups.

RESULTS

The mean LOS was 9.0 days, and the median LOS was 7 days (range = 4-23 days). Low body weight and syndromic deformity were associated with longer LOS. Operation time ≥6 hours and total perioperative fluid administration greater than or equal to twice the estimated blood volume were associated with longer LOS. Among postoperative complications, those with respiratory complication had prolonged stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative low body weight and syndromic scoliosis had longer LOS after 3-column osteotomies. Excessive fluid administration and respiratory complications were associated with longer LOS.

Intraoperative Fluid Management in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

Fluid management has been widely recognized as an important component of the perioperative care in patients undergoing major procedures including spine surgeries. Patient- and surgery-related factors such as age, length of the surgery, massive intraoperative blood loss, and prone positioning, may impact the intraoperative administration of fluids. In addition, the type of fluid administered may also affect post-operative outcomes. Published literature describing intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing major spine surgeries is limited and remains controversial. Therefore, we reviewed current literature on intraoperative fluid management and its association with post-operative complications in spine surgery.

Predictive value of intraoperative factors for complications after oesophagectomy

OBJECTIVES

Oesophagectomy for malignancy is a highly complex and difficult procedure associated with considerable postoperative complications. In this study, we aimed to identify the ability of an intraoperative factor (IPFs)-based classifier to predict complications after oesophagectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective review included 251 patients who underwent radical oesophagectomy from October 2015 to December 2017. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model, we extracted IPFs that were associated with postoperative morbidity and then built a classifier. Preoperative variables and the IPF-based classifier were analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. A nomogram to predict the risk of postoperative morbidity was constructed and validated using bootstrap resampling.

RESULTS

Following the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis, we discovered that those 4 IPF (surgical approach, lowest heart rate, lowest mean arterial blood pressure and estimated blood loss) were associated with postoperative morbidity. After stratification into low-and high-risk groups with the IPF-based classifier, the differences in 30-day morbidity (7.2% vs 70.1%, P < 0.001, respectively) and mortality (0% vs 4.7%, P = 0.029, respectively) were found to be statistically significant. The multivariable analysis demonstrated that the IPF-based classifier was an independent risk factor for predicting postoperative morbidity for patients with oesophageal cancer. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated and proven to be clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that an IPF-based nomogram could reliably predict the risk of postoperative morbidity. It has the potential to facilitate the individual perioperative management of patients with oesophageal cancer.

Trends of postoperative length of stay in spine surgery over 10 years in Japan based on a prospective multicenter database

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) in spine surgery, with the goal of establishing details of LOS for multiple diseases and surgical procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The subjects were patients who underwent spine surgery at 10 facilities in the Nagoya Spine Group from January 2005 to December 2015. Data were collected for patient background, primary spinal pathology, anatomical location of the lesion, and surgical methods. The primary outcome was LOS, which was defined as the calendar days from surgery to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 10,829 patients (5953 males, 4876 females; age 5-93 years, mean 60.2 ± 28.8 years) were identified in the database. Average follow-up was 61 months (range: 13-120 months). Average LOS was 22.3 ± 21.3 days, and there was a gradual decrease in LOS over the study period. LOS was significantly correlated with age, and prolonged LOS was significantly associated with thoracic spine surgery and significantly longer after surgery with instrumentation. Average LOS was >30 days for intramedullary tumor resection and posterior cervical fusion, but only 10.2 days for microendoscopic discectomy. Reoperation was performed in 210 patients (1.9%) and these patients had a significantly higher average LOS of 43.1 days.

CONCLUSION

These results will assist quality improvement in spine surgery. The identified risk factors for prolonged LOS will also assist in planning of surgery, postoperative care, and discharge, with the goal of reducing health care costs.

Development and Feasibility of a Specialty-Specific National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP): The Head and Neck-Reconstructive Surgery NSQIP

IMPORTANCE

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) serves the need for continual quality assessment in general surgery. Previously, no parallel mechanism specific to head and neck oncologic surgery existed.

OBJECTIVE

To address the need for continual quality assessment in subspecialty surgery by adapting the ACS NSQIP platform for complex head and neck oncologic surgical procedures.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

With an institutional ACS NSQIP team's guidance, surgeons from the departments of head and neck surgery and plastic and reconstructive surgery developed disease- and procedure-specific preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables specific to head and neck surgery requiring reconstruction. Collection occurred with 100% sampling and standard ACS NSQIP 30-day follow-up. After a pilot period, long-term functional outcomes were added to this platform. A total of 312 patients underwent head and neck surgery requiring reconstruction at an academic medical center between August 1, 2012, and June 30, 2013.

EXPOSURES

Development of a specialty-specific head and neck surgery ACS NSQIP platform.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The feasibility of adapting the ACS NSQIP platform to capture complex head and neck surgery metrics in all patients.

RESULTS

Head and neck surgery-specific preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were added to the ACS NSQIP platform and evaluated in 312 patients (201 [64.4%] male). Only 42 patients (13.5%) had no preoperative risk factors, and 136 (43.6%) had 3 or more risk factors. The mean (SD) duration of operation was 9.4 (3.0) hours (range, 1.7-19.3 hours). The mean (SD) postoperative length of stay was 7.9 (4.7) days (range, 1-40 days), 58 patients (18.6%) had an unplanned return to the operating room, 23 patients (7.4%) were readmitted within 30 days, and 3 patients (1.0%) died within 30 days. More than half of the patients (160 [51.3%]) did not experience a postoperative occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive complex oncologic surgery outcomes platform derived from ACS NSQIP methods. The initial pilot demonstrates the ability to systematically capture head and neck surgery-specific variables with complete sampling. With multi-institutional expansion, increased accrual, and long-term patient-reported outcomes, we hope to set risk-adjusted benchmarks that may underpin quality improvement efforts in complex head and neck surgery.

Perioperative risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications after major oral and maxillofacial surgery with microvascular reconstruction: A retrospective analysis of 648 cases

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common and result in prolonged hospital stays, higher costs and increased mortality. However, data on the incidence and predictors of PPCs after major oral and maxillofacial surgery with microvascular reconstruction are rare. This retrospective analysis identifies perioperative risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after major oral and maxillofacial surgery with microvascular reconstruction.

METHODS

Perioperative data and patient records of 648 subjects were analyzed in the period of June 2007 to May 2013. PPCs were defined as pneumonia, atelectasis, pleural effusions, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary oedema, pneumothorax or respiratory failure.

RESULTS

18.8% of all patients developed PPCs. Patient-related risk factors for PPCs were male sex, advanced age, smoking, alcohol abuse, a body mass index >30, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade higher than 2, pre-existent pulmonary diseases and preoperative antihypertensive medication. Among the investigated procedure-related variables, the length of the operation, the amount of fluid administration and blood transfusion and an impaired oxygenation index during surgery were shown to be associated with the development of PPCs. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, we identified a body mass index >30, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade higher than 2 and alcohol abuse as independent risk factors for PPCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Several perioperative factors can be identified that are associated with the development of PPCs. Patients having one or more of these conditions should be subjected to intensified postoperative pulmonary care.

Factors affecting length of stay after elective posterior lumbar spine surgery: a multivariate analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Elective posterior lumbar fusion is a common surgical procedure, but reported length of hospital stay is variable (usually 3-7 days). The effect of a limited number of factors on length of stay (LOS) has previously been evaluated. However, multivariate analysis using LOS as a dependent variable to separate potentially confounding variables has not been performed.

PURPOSE

To facilitate setting of realistic expectations and considering the significant costs of hospitalization, it would be ideal to have a clear understanding of the variables affecting LOS for this surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective case series at a tertiary care center.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred three patients undergoing elective, open, one- to three-level posterior lumbar instrumented fusion (with or without decompression) by the orthopedic spine service at our institution between January 2010 and June 2012 were included in the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

LOS was determined from the date of surgery to the date of discharge.

METHODS

Preoperative factors (patient demographics, previous surgery, levels instrumented, American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score, and major medical comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, malignancy, pulmonary disease, or heart disease), intraoperative factors (complications, drain placement, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, fluids administered, operating room time, and surgery time), and postoperative factors (drain removal, blood transfusion, complications, and discharge destination) were collected and analyzed with multivariate stepwise regression to determine predictors of LOS. "Postoperative complications" were excluded as an independent variable from the regression analysis because of its close relationship with LOS. No funding was received for the completion of this study, and there are no potential conflicts of interests.

RESULTS

Our sample included 70 one-level, 26 two-level, and 7 three-level operations. Average LOS was 3.6±1.8 days (mean±SD) with the range 0 to 12 days. Of this cohort, 79% (81 of 103) had a stay of 4 days or less. The only preoperative variables associated with LOS in the multivariate model were age (p=.038) and ASA score (p=.001). History of heart disease (p=.005) was significantly associated with a decreased hospital stay. Intraoperative complications included six dural tears and one pedicle fracture. No intraoperative factors were found to be associated with a longer LOS. Postoperative complications occurred in 32% of patients (33 of 103). Common complications included anemia requiring transfusion (11), altered mental status (8), pneumonia (4), hardware complications requiring reoperation (3). Only one serious complication, renal failure, occurred. Average LOS for patients with a postoperative complication was 5.1±2.3 vs. 2.9±0.9 days for patients with no complication (p<.001). Discharge to a subacute or nursing facility (p<.001) was significantly associated with increased LOS. Levels fused were not predictive of LOS, possibly due to the skew toward one-level cases in our sample.

CONCLUSION

Patients who are older and have widespread systemic disease tend to stay in the hospital longer after surgery. Contrary to our expectations, no single comorbidity was predictive of longer hospital stays. Heart disease was associated with a shorter LOS, but this may have been due to a more extensive preoperative workup and closer medical management. Intraoperative events did not affect LOS; however, postoperative events did. These data should prove useful for counseling patients and setting expectations of patients and the health care team.

Using the ACS-NSQIP to identify factors affecting hospital length of stay after elective posterior lumbar fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2010 that included 1861 patients who had undergone elective posterior lumbar fusion.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize factors that were independently associated with increased hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients who had undergone elective posterior lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior lumbar spine fusion is a common surgical procedure used to treat lumbar spine pathology. LOS is an important clinical variable and a major determinant of inpatient hospital costs. There is lack of studies in the literature using multivariate analysis to examine specifically the predictors of LOS after elective posterior lumbar fusion.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective posterior lumbar fusion from 2005 to 2010 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were extracted for each case and a multivariate linear regression was performed to assess the contribution of each variable to LOS.

RESULTS

A total of 1861 patients who had undergone elective posterior lumbar fusion were identified. The average age for patients in this cohort was 60.6 ± 13.9 years (mean ± standard deviation) with a body mass index of 30.3 ± 6.2 kg/m. Of the total patients, 44.7% of patients were male. LOS was in the range from 0 days to 51 days. Multivariate linear regression identified age (P < 0.001), morbid obesity (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m, P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = 0.001), operative time (P < 0.001), multilevel procedure (P = 0.001), and intraoperative transfusion (P < 0.001) as significant predictors of extended LOS.

CONCLUSION

The identified preoperative and intraoperative variables associated with extended LOS after elective posterior lumbar fusion may be helpful to clinicians for patient counseling and postoperative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Predictive factors of hospital stay in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

A single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of length of stay (LOS) days in patients undergoing 1 level minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recent studies suggest intraoperative fluid administration, and colloid and crystalloid administration among other intraoperative variables may prolong LOS days and increase complications. Therefore, an understanding of which preoperative, intraoperative, and immediate postoperative parameters best predict immediate LOS days will help risk stratify patients and guide decision making.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 104 patients undergoing a MIS TLIF at 1 institution between 2008 and 2010. Two groups were selected on the basis of the time of discharge. Group 1 consisted of patients discharged within 24 hours after surgery and group 2 consisted of patients discharged more than 24 hours after surgery. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine which preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were independent predictors of LOS days.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients (75%) with a LOS greater than 24 hours had significantly higher estimated blood loss, received more crystalloids, had higher total fluids, longer surgical time, lower end of case temperature, lower hemoglobin during hospitalization, and a lower preoperative narcotic use. Multiple regression analysis showed that significant predictors of increased LOS were postoperative creatinine, visual analogue scale score, intraoperative colloids, fluids input at the end of surgical case, crystalloid to colloid ratio, fluid balance, oxycodone (Oxycontin) use, mean percentage of fraction of inspired oxygen, and preoperative hemoglobin.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing 1 level MIS TLIF for degenerative conditions can overall expect a short LOS postoperatively. Multiple preoperative, intraoperative, and immediate postoperative factors can prolong the LOS in this group. This information should help the surgical team in optimizing their intraoperative patient management.