1
|
Goodwin CR, Ahmed AK, Boone C, Abu-Bonsrah N, Xu R, Germscheid N, Fourney DR, Clarke M, Laufer I, Fisher CG, Bettegowda C, Sciubba DM. The Challenges of Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic to the Spine: A Systematic Review of Survival and Treatment. Global Spine J 2018; 8:517-526. [PMID: 30258759 PMCID: PMC6149047 DOI: 10.1177/2192568217737777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVES The objective of this systematic review was to answer 2 key questions: (1) What is the clinical presentation and probability of symptomatic improvement following treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of the spine? (2) What is the overall survival of patients diagnosed with spinal metastases from RCC? METHODS A literature review was performed to identify articles that reported on survival, clinical outcomes, and/or prognostic factors in the RCC population with spinal metastases from 1986 to 2016. RESULTS Forty-eight articles (807 patients) were included. The Fuhrman Nuclear Grade has been significantly associated with survival in previous studies but was underpowered in the current study. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Score (MSKCC/Motzer) was also underpowered in the current study. From the time of spinal metastasis, the mean and median survival for patients with previously diagnosed primary RCC was 8.75 and 11.7 months, respectively, whereas synchronously diagnosed patients (primary RCC and spinal metastasis) had a mean and median survival of 6.75 and 11 months, respectively. Patients with a "low" (0-8), "intermediate" (9-11), or "high" (12-15) revised Tokuhashi score at initial presentation had a median survival of 5.4, 11.7, and 32.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients with either a synchronous or latent diagnosis of RCC survived greater than 6 months from the time of presentation. Initial Furhman grade, Tokuhashi score, and MSKCC/Motzer can be useful tools in informing patient-specific prognosis for those with metastatic RCC of the spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Rory Goodwin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA,These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.,C. Rory Goodwin, Department of Neurosurgery,
Duke University Medical Center, 200 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - A. Karim Ahmed
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,
USA,These authors contributed equally to this manuscript
| | - Christine Boone
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,
USA,These authors contributed equally to this manuscript
| | | | - Risheng Xu
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,
USA
| | | | | | | | - Ilya Laufer
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles G. Fisher
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada,Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoshioka K, Murakami H, Demura S, Kato S, Yokogawa N, Kawahara N, Tomita K, Tsuchiya H. Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy. Spine Surg Relat Res 2017; 1:31-39. [PMID: 31440610 PMCID: PMC6698537 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is required to secure oncologically adequate resection margins. However, no useful information has been reported for spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Therefore, this study set out to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. METHODS Forty-eight patients treated with multilevel TES at our institute were included in the analysis. Reconstruction was achieved with posterior pedicle screw fixation and an anterior titanium mesh cage filled with iliac autograft in all cases. Spinal shortening was performed to increase spinal stability from the reconstruction. Instrumentation failure and radiological findings were evaluated with radiography and computerized tomography (CT). RESULTS After excluding one patient whose general condition was deteriorating, radiological evaluations of 47 patients were performed over a period of more than a year. The follow-up time was 17 to 120 months (mean: 70.2 months). Instrumentation failure occurred in one patient (5.9%) after thoracic multilevel TES, in 4 patients (25.0%) after thoracolumbar multilevel TES, and in 3 patients (42.9%) after lumbar multilevel TES. No instrumentation failure was observed in cervicothoracic cases. Cage subsidence (>2 mm) occurred in 30 patients (63.8%). In 22 of them, subsidence appeared on the CT one month after surgery. The risk factors of instrumentation failure included a multilevel TES below the thoracolumbar level and a long span of vertebral resection. There was no instrumentation failure in any of the 11 "disc-to-disc cutting" cases. CONCLUSIONS This study identified the risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel TES. There is a high risk of instrumentation failure in cases of long vertebral resection below the thoracolumbar level. On the other hand, our reconstruction method can be successful for multilevel TES above the thoracic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuhito Yoshioka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Graduate School of Medical Science, Japan
| | - Hideki Murakami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Graduate School of Medical Science, Japan
| | - Satoru Demura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Graduate School of Medical Science, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Graduate School of Medical Science, Japan
| | - Noriaki Yokogawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Graduate School of Medical Science, Japan
| | - Norio Kawahara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Japan
| | - Katsuro Tomita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Graduate School of Medical Science, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Graduate School of Medical Science, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hartmann S, Wipplinger C, Tschugg A, Kavakebi P, Örley A, Girod PP, Thomé C. Thoracic corpectomy for neoplastic vertebral bodies using a navigated lateral extracavitary approach-a single-center consecutive case series: technique and analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2017; 41:575-583. [PMID: 28819694 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-017-0895-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Thoracic myelopathy is often caused by vertebral body fractures resulting from neoplastic conditions, traumatic events, or infectious diseases. One of the preferred procedures for treating it is the lateral extracavitary approach (LECA) with single-level or multilevel decompressive corpectomy and reconstruction. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the thoracic lateral extracavitary approach with corpectomy using vertebral body replacement systems (VBR-S) and dorsal reconstruction. Twenty-four patients with metastatic or primary lesions of thoracic vertebrae T2-T12 underwent spinal decompression and ventral column reconstruction with correction of spinal deformity via a LECA. One-level to four-level corpectomies were performed with additional navigated dorsal pedicle screw fixation at an average of two levels above and below the corpectomy lesion. None of the patients received preoperative spinal embolization, and the majority of the patients were admitted to radiotherapy postoperatively. Their mean age was 56 years (± 15), with a female-to-male sex ratio of 8 to 16. Patients with a minimum follow-up period of 16 months were included. The Karnofsky index, preoperative and postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS), and Frankel scale were measured. In addition, intraoperative loss of blood (LOB), units of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions, the duration of the operation, and the hospitalization period were evaluated and correlated with preoperative and postoperative values. The majority of the patients were suffering from metastatic lesions and were treated with a 1 level corpectomy (median 1 level, range 1 to 4). The mean duration of surgery was 288 min (± 121) and the mean LOB was 1626 mL (± 1486 mL), with approximately two PRBC units per patient used. All patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) postoperatively, with a mean ICU stay of 2.0 days (± 1 day). The mean hospitalization period was 13 days (± 7 days). No implant-related failures or procedure-related deaths were observed. Significant differences were noted between the preoperative and postoperative Karnofsky index (74 vs. 84%) and NRS (4 vs. 2). One patient required revision surgery due to a superficial wound infection, and another needed revision surgery due to a dural tear. In another patient, an iatrogenic dural tear was repaired during the same surgical procedure and did not lead to postoperative complications. Four pleural effusions and one pneumothorax were observed, so that the overall complication rate was approximately 33%. Four of the patients died within 2 years of the operation due to progression of the primary disease. Lateral corpectomy and sagittal reconstruction of the thoracic spine using VBR-S conducted via a navigated LECA approach yields favorable results, despite the burden of neoplastic disease. These challenging procedures are accompanied by increased LOB and hospitalization periods, with moderate transfusion requirements. Surgery-related complications are low and local tumor control is satisfactory, despite the progression of the underlying neoplastic disease. However, optimal surgical therapy does not ensure long-term survival.Study design Retrospective analysis of thoracic corpectomiesLevel of evidence 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Hartmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Christoph Wipplinger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Anja Tschugg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Pujan Kavakebi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alexander Örley
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Pierre Pascal Girod
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yücel ÖB, Tunç HM, Başaran M, Aras N. 22-year survival following radical nephrectomy and several metastasectomies in a case of renal cell carcinoma. Turk J Urol 2017; 43:216-219. [PMID: 28717549 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.04372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 08/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy. Metastases can be seen both synchronously, at the time of diagnosis, and metachronously during follow-up. At the time of diagnosis, 23% of the patients have metastatic disease. and 25% of patients will develop metastasis during follow-up period after nephrectomy. Nearly 80% of them develop within the first 5 years. However late metastasis of RCC have been also reported within the postoperative 10 years in the literature. For metastatic lesions, if surgically feasible, metastasectomy, and targeted pharmaceutical agents have been recommended. However any randomized controlled study which aimed to determine treatment protocol in patients who develop multiple metastases has not been cited in the literature. Herein, we are presenting a case with renal cell carcinoma in whom within 22 years of follow-up after 10 years of survival multiple metastases in different organs were detected which were managed with surgical, and medical treatments. As far as we know, this case is the first patient with the longest survival whose non-pulmonary metastases had been treated with more than one surgical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ömer Barış Yücel
- Department of Urology, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Hayri Murat Tunç
- Department of Urology, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mert Başaran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Necdet Aras
- Department of Urology, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kato S, Murakami H, Demura S, Nambu K, Fujimaki Y, Yoshioka K, Kawahara N, Tomita K, Tsuchiya H. Spinal metastasectomy of renal cell carcinoma: A 16-year single center experience with a minimum 3-year follow-up. J Surg Oncol 2016; 113:587-92. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 01/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Kato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Kanazawa University School of Medicine; Kanazawa Japan
| | - Hideki Murakami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Kanazawa University School of Medicine; Kanazawa Japan
| | - Satoru Demura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Kanazawa University School of Medicine; Kanazawa Japan
| | - Koshi Nambu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Kanazawa University School of Medicine; Kanazawa Japan
| | - Yoshiyasu Fujimaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Kanazawa University School of Medicine; Kanazawa Japan
| | | | - Norio Kawahara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Kanazawa Medical University; Ishikawa Japan
| | - Katsuro Tomita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Kanazawa University School of Medicine; Kanazawa Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery; Kanazawa University School of Medicine; Kanazawa Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gerety EL, Lawrence EM, Wason J, Yan H, Hilborne S, Buscombe J, Cheow HK, Shaw AS, Bird N, Fife K, Heard S, Lomas DJ, Matakidou A, Soloviev D, Eisen T, Gallagher FA. Prospective study evaluating the relative sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT for detecting skeletal metastases from renal cell carcinoma in comparison to multidetector CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, using an adaptive trial design. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:2113-8. [PMID: 26202597 PMCID: PMC4576907 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2015] [Revised: 06/15/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The detection of occult bone metastases is a key factor in determining the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially when curative surgery is considered. This prospective study assessed the sensitivity of (18)F-labelled sodium fluoride in conjunction with positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-NaF PET/CT) for detecting RCC bone metastases, compared with conventional imaging by bone scintigraphy or CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS An adaptive two-stage trial design was utilized, which was stopped after the first stage due to statistical efficacy. Ten patients with stage IV RCC and bone metastases were imaged with (18)F-NaF PET/CT and (99m)Tc-labelled methylene diphosphonate ((99m)Tc-MDP) bone scintigraphy including pelvic single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Images were reported independently by experienced radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians using a 5-point scoring system. RESULTS Seventy-seven lesions were diagnosed as malignant: 100% were identified by (18)F-NaF PET/CT, 46% by CT and 29% by bone scintigraphy/SPECT. Standard-of-care imaging with CT and bone scintigraphy identified 65% of the metastases reported by (18)F-NaF PET/CT. On an individual patient basis, (18)F-NaF PET/CT detected more RCC metastases than (99m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy/SPECT or CT alone (P = 0.007). The metabolic volumes, mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUV mean and SUV max) of the malignant lesions were significantly greater than those of the benign lesions (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS (18)F-NaF PET/CT is significantly more sensitive at detecting RCC skeletal metastases than conventional bone scintigraphy or CT. The detection of occult bone metastases could greatly alter patient management, particularly in the context when standard-of-care imaging is negative for skeletal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E L Gerety
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge
| | - E M Lawrence
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - J Wason
- MRC Biostatistics Unit Hub for Trials Methodology, Cambridge
| | - H Yan
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - S Hilborne
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - J Buscombe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge
| | - H K Cheow
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge
| | - A S Shaw
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge
| | - N Bird
- East Anglian Regional Radiation Protection Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge
| | - K Fife
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge
| | - S Heard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge
| | - D J Lomas
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - A Matakidou
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - D Soloviev
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - T Eisen
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - F A Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dabestani S, Bex A. Metastasectomy. KIDNEY CANCER 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17903-2_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|